Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:11:06.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High efficiency of energy utilization in ‘cafeteria’- and force-fed rats kept at 29°

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

H. Gillian Barr  and
K. J. Mccracken
H. Gillian Barr
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
K. J. Mccracken
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Chemistry Research Division, Department of Agriculture, Northern Ireland and The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Male, Sprague-Dawley (Charles-River) rats, of initial weight 272 g, were given a powdered stock diet (T1) ad lib. force-fed a synthetic diet (T2) or offered a range of palatable foods in conjunction with the powdered stock diet (T3) or a similar diet supplemented with certain minerals and vitamins (T4).

2. Metabolizable energy (ME) intake (kJ/d) averaged 303, 453, 402 and 383 for T1, T2, T3 and T4 respectively and corresponding weight gains were 5.5, 6.9, 8.2 and 7.9 g/d and were significantly different (P < 0.001).

3. The intakes of T3 and T4 rats ranged from 10 to 60% above the mean value for T1.

4. Crude protein (CP; nitrogen × 6.25) retentions were similar for T1, T3 and T4 rats and significantly lower (P < 0.01) for T2 rats. Fat retentions were 1.1, 4.1, 2.9 and 2.4 g/d for T1 to T4 respectively (P < 0.001).

5. The energy contents of the gain (MJ/kg) were 12.7, 26.0, 16.7 and 14.9 for T1 to T4 respectively (P < 0.001) and energy retentions (kJ/d) were 70, 179, 139 and 117 respectively (P < 0.001).

6. A linear regression of energy retention (ER) on ME yielded a slope of 0.78 and a mean energy requirement for zero balance of 510 kJ/kg body-weight0.75.

7. These results are in conflict with reports of ‘diet-induced thermogenesis’ in ‘cafeteria’-fed rats.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , May 1984 , pp. 379 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1984

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1981). The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Andrews, J. F. & Donne, B. (1982). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 41, 36A.Google Scholar
Armitage, G., Hervey, G. R., Rolls, B. J., Rowe, E. A. & Tobin, G. (1981). Journal of Physiology 317, 48P.Google Scholar
Bestley, J. W., Bramley, P. N., Dobson, P. M. S., Mahanty, A. & Tobin, G. (1982). Journal of Physiology 330, 70P.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. (1978). Drug and dietary manipulation of fat and protein deposition in the growing rat and pig. PhD Thesis, The Queen's University of Belfast.Google Scholar
Brouwer, E. (1965). European Association for Animal Production, Publication No. 11, 441–443.Google Scholar
Cohn, C. & Joseph, D. (1959). American Journal of Physiology 196, 965–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, C. & Joseph, D. (1963). American Journal of Physiology 205, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, A. E., Williams, J. N. & Elvehjem, C. A. (1950). Journal of Nutrition 42, 423–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, D. O. & Frydman, M. L. (1978). Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 56, 110–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hervey, G. R. & Tobin, G. (1982 a). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 41, 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hervey, G. R. & Tobin, G. (1982 b). Journal of Physiology 330, 71P.Google Scholar
McCracken, K. J. (1975). British Journal of Nutrition 33, 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCracken, K. J. & Gray, R. (1976). European Association of Animal Production, Publication No. 19, 141–144.Google Scholar
McCracken, K. J. & McNiven, M. A. (1983). British Journal of Nutrition 49, 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mickelsen, O., Takahashi, S. & Craig, C. (1955). Journal of Nutrition 57, 541–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (1978). Nutrient Requirements of Laboratory Animals 3rd revised ed. Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Paul, A. A. & Southgate, D. A. T. (1978). McCance and Widdowsons ‘The Composition of Foods’ 4th ed. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Pullar, J. D. & Webster, A. J. F. (1977). British Journal of Nutrition 37, 355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothwell, N. J. & Stock, M. J. (1979). Nature 281, 31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothwell, N. J. & Stock, M. J. (1982). Journal of Nutrition 112, 1515–1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalafani, A. & Springer, D. (1976). Physiology and Behaviour 17, 461–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schemmel, R., Mickelsen, O. & Motani, K. (1972). Journal of Nutrition 102, 1187–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidransky, H. & Baba, T. (1960). Journal of Nutrition 70, 463–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, R. W. (1944). Journal of Nutrition 28, 359–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trayhurn, P., Jones, P. M., McGuckin, M. M. & Goodbody, A. E. (1982). Nature 295, 323–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulp, O. L., Frink, R. & Danforth, E. (1982). Life Sciences 30, 1525–1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanschoubroek, F. X. (1966). World Congress on Animal Feeding, Madrid 1, 217–262.Google Scholar