Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:29:12.354Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enzyme supplementation of a poultry diet containing rye and wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

D. Pettersson  and
P. Åman
D. Pettersson
Affiliation:
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Box 7024, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
P. Åman
Affiliation:
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Box 7024, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A total of 360 I-d-old broiler chickens were fed on a diet based on rye and wheat in equal proportions without or with supplementation of increasing levels (0.11, 0.22, 0.44 and 0.88 g/kg) of a technical enzyme preparation containing pentosanase and β-glucanase activities. In vitro investigations revealed that the enzyme preparation solubilized pentosans, increasing the relative viscosity of buffer extracts from enzyme-supplemented diets. Enzyme supplementation generally improved body-weight by approximately 27% at day 15 and 15% at day 27, increased feed intake by 15 and 8% respectively, and improved feed conversion efficiency by 10 and 5% respectively. There was also a decreased occurrence of sticky droppings. Enzyme supplementation increased the digestibility of organic matter, crude protein (nitrogen x 6.25) and starch measured in the last third of the small intestine, and of organic matter and crude fat measured in excreta. Solubilization of insoluble pentosans by the enzyme included led to negative digestibility values for soluble pentosans in the small intestine at the higher levels of supplementation. Most of the dietary fibre degradation observed occurred before the middle section of the small intestine, with some degradation of soluble fibre in the caeca and colon. The solubilization and disruption of feed endosperm cell walls by enzyme supplementation probably was primarily responsible for the observed improvements in digestibility and production results.

Keywords

Enzyme supplementationDigestibilityPentosansChicken
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , July 1989 , pp. 139 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1989

References

REFERENCES

Åman, P. & Hesselman, K. (1984). Analysis of starch and other main constituents of cereal grains. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 135–139.Google Scholar
Anon. (1971). Determination of crude oils and fats. Official Journal of the European Communities L297, 995–997.Google Scholar
Antoniou, T. & Marquardt, R.R. (1981). Influence of rye pentosans on the growth of chicks. Poultry Science 60, 1898–1904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antoniou, T., Marquardt, R.R. & Cansfield, P.E. (1981). Isolation, partial characterization and antinutritional activity of a factor (pentosans) in rye grain. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 29, 1240–1247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1984). Official Methods of Analysis, 14th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Björnhag, G. & Sperber, I. (1977). Transport of various food components through the digestive tract of turkeys, geese and guinea fowl. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 7, 57–66.Google Scholar
Boros, D., Rakowska, M., Raczyńska-Bojanowska, K. & Kozacyński, K. (1985). The response of Japanese quails and chicks to the water-soluble antinutritive compounds from rye grain. Nutrition Reports International 32, 827–836.Google Scholar
Burnett, G.S. (1966). Studies on viscosity as the probable factor involved in the improvement of certain barleys for chickens by enzyme supplementation. British Poultry Science 7, 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, R.M. & Thomas, O.P. (1980). Growth depression of chicks fed a crude rye extract containing pectic substances. Poultry Science 59, 2754–2759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eriksson, S. (1955). Digestibility and metabolizable energy of poultry rations at different levels of nutrition. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 5, 201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, R., Lucas, E. & McGinnis, J. (1973). Fractionation of a chick growth depressing factor from rye. Poultry Science 52, 2252–2259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fincher, G.B. (1975). Morphology and chemical composition of barley endosperm cell walls. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 81, 116–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, I.S. & Wainwright, T. (1977). The mode of binding of β-glucans and pentosans in barley endosperm cell walls. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 83, 279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, R.E., Allred, J.B., Jensen, L.S. & McGinnis, J. (1958). Influence of enzyme supplementation and water treatment on the nutritional value of different grains for poults. Poultry Science 37, 372–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpin, J.G., Holmes, C.E. & Hart, E.B. (1936). Rye as a feed for poultry. Poultry Science 15, 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartfiel, W. (1973). Richtlinien zur Durchführung von Bilanzversuchen mit Hühnern. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 2, 49–57.Google Scholar
Henry, R.J. (1985). A comparison of the nonstarch carbohydrates in cereal grains. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 36, 1243–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesselman, K. (1983) Effects of β-glucanase supplementation to barley based diets for broiler chickens. PhD Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Hesselman, K. & Åman, P. (1985). A note on microscopy studies on water- and β-glucanase-treated barley. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 15, 139–143.Google Scholar
Hesselman, K. & Åman, P. (1986). The effect of β-glucanase on the utilization of starch and nitrogen by broiler chickens fed on barley of low or high viscosity. Animal Feed Science and Technology 15, 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jami, M.S., Pubols, M.H. & McGinnis, J. (1980). Effect of gamma irradiation on the physicochemical properties of rye. Poultry Science 59, 253–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, L.S., Fry, R.E., Allred, J.B. & McGinnis, J. (1957). Improvement in the nutritional value of barley for chicks by enzyme supplementation. Poultry Science 36, 919–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, K. & Bengtsson, S. (1983). Metodbeskrivning Nr. 22 (in Swedish), pp. 1–9. Uppsala: Statens lantbrukskemiska laboratorium.Google Scholar
Mares, D.J. & Stone, B.A. (1973). Studies on wheat endosperm. I. Chemical composition and ultrastructure of the cell walls. Australian Journal of Biological Science 26, 793–812.Google Scholar
Marquardt, R.R. (1983). A simple spectrophotometric method for the direct determination of uric acid in avian excreta. Poultry Science 62, 2106–2108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marquardt, R.R., Fengler, A.I. & Pawlik, J. (1987). Improvement of the nutritional value of cereal grains through the use of crude enzymes of microbial origin. Third Annual Biotechnology in the Feed Industry Symposium, pp. 1–14. Lexington, Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
Marquardt, R.R., Ward, A.T. & Misir, R. (1979). The retention of nutrients by chicks fed rye diets supplemented with amino acids and penicillin supplementation. Poultry Science 58, 631–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misir, R. & Marquardt, R.R. (1978). Factors affecting rye (Secale cereale L.) utilization in growing chicks. I. The influence of rye level, ergot and penicillin supplementation. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 58, 691–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, E.T. Jr, Lall, S.P. & Summers, J.D. (1970). Altering the proportion of rye to maize in the grain fraction of practical broiler rations: effect on live performance, litter moisture, dressing yield and carcass quality. British Poultry Science 11, 147–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, M.B., Jami, M.S. & McGinnis, J. (1980). Effect of gamma irradiation, penicillin, and/or pectic enzyme on chick growth depression and fecal stickiness caused by rye, citrus pectin and guar gum. Poultry Science 59, 2105–2110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettersson, D. & Åman, P. (1988). Effects of enzyme supplementation of diets based on wheat, rye or triticale on their productive value for broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 20, 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettersson, D., Hesselman, K. & Åman, P. (1987). Nutritional value for chickens of dried distillers-spent-grain from barley and dehulled barley. Animal Feed Science and Technology 17, 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. (1985). SAS User's Guide: Statistics, pp. 1–956. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Scholtyssek, Von S. & Knorr, R. (1987). Die Wirkung eines cellulolytischen Enzympräparates bei Verfütterung von Triticale- und Roggenrationen an Broiler. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 51, 10–15.Google Scholar
Theander, O. & Åman, P. (1979). Studies on dietary fibres. 1. Analysis and chemical characterization of water-soluble and water-insoluble dietary fibres. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 9, 97–106.Google Scholar
Theander, O. & Westerlund, E. (1986). Studies on dietary fibers. III. Improved procedures for analysis of dietary fibers. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 34, 330–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, A.T. & Marquardt, R.R. (1983). The effect of saturation, chain length of pure triglycerides, and age of bird on the utilization of rye diets. Poultry Science 62, 1054–1062.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, W.B., Bird, H.R., Sunde, M.L., Prentice, N., Burger, W.C. & Marlett, J.A. (1981). The viscosity interaction of barley beta-glucan with Trichoderma viride cellulase in the chick intestine. Poultry Science 60, 1043–1048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, C.H., David, D.J. & Iismaa, O. (1962). The determination of chromic oxide in faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Journal of Agricultural Science 59, 381–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar