Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:09:16.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of nematode parasitism on the rate of passage of food residues through the alimentary tract of sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

R. J. Bawden
R. J. Bawden
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The mean retention time of stained food residues was longer in sheep maintained on a chopped straw ration than in sheep maintained on a chopped lucerne ration.

2. Infection of sheep with 1500 infective Oesophagostomum columbianum juveniles was associated with increased mean retention times.

3. The extent to which the mean retention times were increased was associated with the diet and mode of infection of the sheep.

4. It was noted that an increase in mean retention time following infection was associated with a general decrease in food intake per kg live eight0.75.

5. The results are discussed in relation to the pathogenesis and survival of O.columbianum infections in sheep.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , March 1970 , pp. 291 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1970

References

Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1960). Official Methods of Analysis, 9th ed. Washington D.C.Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. (1950). Br. J. Nutr. 4, 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawden, R. J. (1969 a). Aust. J. agric. Res. 20, 589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawden, R. J. (1969 b). Aust. J. agric. Res. 20, 1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. McC. & Wainman, F. W. (1956). Br. J. Nutr. 10, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Wainman, F. W. & Wilson, R. S. (1961). Anim. Prod. 3, 51.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C., Freer, M. & Balch, C. C. (1962). Br. J. Nutr. 16, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, E. J. (1956). Br. J. Nutr. 10, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombe, J. B. & Tribe, D. E. (1963). Aust. J. agric. Res. 14, 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freer, M. & Campling, R. C. (1963). Br. J. Nutr. 17, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, H. McL. (1950). Aust. vet. J. 26, 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsh, J. E. Jr (1947). J. Parasit. 33, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsh, J. E. Jr (1950). Science, N. Y. 111, 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsh, J. E. Jr & Hendricks, J. R. (1949). J. Parasit. 35, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mäkelä, A. (1956). Suom. Maataloust. Serv. Julk. 85, 1.Google Scholar
Platt, B. S. (1963). Mimeographed Document. WHO /Helminth/61. Expert Committee on Helminthia-ses (Soil-transmitted Helminths). Rio de Janeiro, August 1963.Google Scholar
Rogers, W. P. (1955). Expl Parasitol. 4, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar