Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:36:25.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dipeptidase activity in the small intestinal mucosa during pregnancy and lactation in the rat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2008

B. A. Rolls
B. A. Rolls
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Rats were mated and at weekly intervals during pregnancy and lactation, and after weaning, the dipeptidase activity in the supernatant fraction from small intestinal mucosa extracts was determined for two dipeptides: glycyl–L-leucine dipeptidase (EC 3.4.3.2) and L-alanyl–L-glutamic acid dipeptidase.

2. Dipeptidase activity is found mainly in the soluble (supernantant) fraction of the mucosa homogenate.

3. Compared with those values obtained for unmated controls, the food consumption of the animals and the nitrogen content, total and specific activities of the dipeptidases (per unit quantity of N) in the soluble fraction of the small intestinal mucosa extracts increased slightly during pregnancy and markedly during lactation. After the pups were weaned, values for all these measurements fell rapidly.

4. Whether the increases found in enzyme activity were simply a response to increased food intake or were the result of hormonal stimulus is discussed.

Type
General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , January 1975 , pp. 1 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1975

References

Anderson, R. R. & Turner, C. W. (1963). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 113, 334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. M. & Fell, B. F. (1964). J. Physiol., Lond. 171, 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotes, P. M. & Cross, B. A. (1954). J. Endocr. 10, 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craft, I. L. (1970). clin. sci. 38, 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crean, G. P. & Rumsey, R. D. E. (1971). J. Physiol., Lond. 215, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cripps, A. (1972). Gastrointestinal function during pregnancy and lactation in the rat. BSc Thesis, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.Google Scholar
Das, M. & Radhakrishnan, A. N. (1972). Biochem. J. 128, 463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fell, B. F. (1972). Wld Rev. Nutr. Diet. 14, 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, M., Parsons, D. S. & Wojnarowska, F. (1972). J. Physiol., Lond. 227, 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josefsson, L. & Lindberg, T. (1965). Biochim. biophys. Acta 105, 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josefsson, L. & Lindberg, T. (1966). Acta physiol. scand. 66, 410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josefsson, L. & Sjöström, T. (1966). Acta physiol. scand. 67, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, T. (1966). Acta physiol. scand. 69, Suppl. 285.Google Scholar
Matthews, D. M., Lis, M. T., Cheng, B. & Crampton, R. F. (1969). Clin. Sci. 37, 751.Google Scholar
Peters, T. J. (1970 a). Gut 11, 720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, T. J. (1970 b). Biochem. J. 120, 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, G. B. (1963). Biochem. J. 88, 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snook, J. T. & Meyer, J. H. (1966). In The Role of the Gastrointestinal Tract in Protein Metabolism p. 97 [Munro, H. N., editor] Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Solimano, G., Burgess, E. A. & Levin, B. (1967). Br. J. Nutr. 21, 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar