Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:21:05.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dietary patterns and benign breast diseases: a case–control study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Zeinab Tiznobeyk
Affiliation:
Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Hojatdost Street, Naderi Street, Keshavarz Boulevard, Tehran 14155/6117, Iran
Zahra Sheikhi Mobarakeh*
Affiliation:
Department of Cancer Quality of Life, Breast Cancer Research Center, Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR), 146, South Gandi Avenue, Vanak Square, Tehran 1517964311, Iran
Mostafa Qorbani
Affiliation:
Department of Community Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Taleghani Square, Taleghani Boulevard, Edari Shahrak, Karaj 3146883411, Iran
Fariba Koohdani
Affiliation:
Department of Cellular, Molecular Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Hojatdost Street, Naderi Street, Keshavarz Boulelvard, Tehran 14155/6117, Iran
Gity Sotoudeh*
Affiliation:
Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Hojatdost Street, Naderi Street, Keshavarz Boulevard, Tehran 14155/6117, Iran
Farahnaz Khajehnasiri
Affiliation:
Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Qods Street, Poorsina Street, Tehran 14155/6134, Iran
Shahla Khosravi
Affiliation:
Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Qods Street, Poorsina Street, Tehran 14155/6134, Iran
Farideh Doostan
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, School of Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Jomhoori Eslami Boulevard, Kerman 7616913555, Iran
*
*Corresponding author: G. Sotoudeh, fax +98 21 8897 4462, email [email protected]; Z. Sheikhi Mobarakeh, fax +98 21 8879 6208, email [email protected]
*Corresponding author: G. Sotoudeh, fax +98 21 8897 4462, email [email protected]; Z. Sheikhi Mobarakeh, fax +98 21 8879 6208, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several studies have investigated the relation between benign breast diseases (BBD) and food intake. However, dietary patterns of these patients have not been taken into consideration up to now. The aim of this study is to determine the association between dietary patterns and BBD. In this case–control study, ninety-six patients with BBD and seventy controls were selected from women attending the Iranian Center for Breast Cancer affiliated with Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research. Demographic, physical activity and semi-quantitative FFQ were completed. The main dietary patterns were extracted by factor analysis. Two major dietary patterns emerged: Healthy dietary pattern including fish, poultry, eggs, low-fat dairy products, vegetables, legumes, nuts and seeds, whole grains, oil and mayonnaise, olives, fruits; and Unhealthy dietary pattern including red meats, organ and processed meats, high-fat dairy products, refined grains, sweets and desserts, animal and solid fats. After adjustment for age, BMI and energy intake, the participants in the highest tertile of Healthy dietary pattern (OR 0·44; 95 % CI 0·20, 0·99) were less likely to have BBD compared with those in the first tertile. After adjustment for other confounding variables, this relationship still remained close to significant level. However, higher consumption of Unhealthy dietary pattern was not associated with the risk of BBD. In conclusion, Healthy dietary pattern might be inversely associated with the risk of BBD; however, this result should be interpreted with caution. Future studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2016 

The term ‘benign breast diseases’ (BBD) is applied to describe a wide range of non-cancerous breast diseases. These diseases are classified into three groups based on their influence on breast cancer risk: (1) non-proliferative diseases, which are not associated with breast cancer risk; (2) proliferative diseases without atypia, which stimulate the growth of lobular and ductal cells in breast tissue( Reference Hunt, Green and Buchholz 1 ) and which increase the breast cancer risk by 1·3–1·9 times( Reference Hartmann, Sellers and Frost 2 ); and (3) proliferative diseases with atypia such as atypical ductal and lobular hyperplasia( Reference Hunt, Green and Buchholz 1 (. The risk of breast cancer is 3·7–4·2 times higher in the third group( Reference Hartmann, Sellers and Frost 2 ). Although BBD cases constitute >90 % of reasons for attending breast clinics( Reference Foulkes and Gateley 3 ), these diseases are usually disregarded in comparison with breast cancer( Reference Courtillot, Plu-Bureau and Binart 4 ). In autopsy studies, it is estimated that one in two women will be diagnosed with some grades of cystic fibrosis, and one in five will suffer from fibroadenoma in their lifetime. The role of endogenous hormones, oral contraceptive and oestrogen replacement therapy in the development of BBD entails further investigation. Obesity is established as the sole protective factor, although it is not recommended because of adverse effects. No relationship has been established between the age at menarche, smoking, alcoholic drinks and caffeine consumption with BBD( Reference Goehring and Morabia 5 ). Several studies have been undertaken to assess the association between food, macronutrients and micronutrients with the risk of BBD( Reference Goehring and Morabia 5 Reference Frazier and Rosenberg 17 ). Regarding the association of food intake and BBD, some controversial results are reported and no specific dietary pattern has been yet proposed( Reference Goehring and Morabia 5 ). Ingram et al.( Reference Ingram, Nottage and Roberts 10 ) found the consumption of red meats, savoury dishes (pizza, pie and stew) and starches to be harmful, whereas eating poultry, fish and fruits is beneficial. Fruits and vegetables are suggested to protect against BBD( Reference Galvan-Portillo, Anchez and Lopez-Carrillo 8 , Reference Hislop, Band and Deschamps 9 , Reference Wu, Ray and Lin 16 ). In the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) trial, a low-fat dietary pattern with reduced fat intake and increased fruit and vegetable consumption did not alter the progression of BBD( Reference Rohan, Negassa and Caan 15 ). The dietary patterns have grabbed the attention of researchers during the past decade( Reference Wu, Mimi and Tseng 18 , Reference Buck, Vrieling and Flesch-Janys 19 ), because of the involvement of the interactions of dietary components and synergic effects of food ingredients( Reference Edefonti, Randi and La Vecchia 20 Reference Männistö, Dixon and Balder 23 ). The use of dietary patterns could better reflect the nutritional behaviour in individuals( Reference Sieri, Krogh and Pala 24 , Reference Cottet, Touvier and Fournier 25 ). Moreover, dietary patterns are more appropriate tools for public health nutrition recommendations( Reference Edefonti, Randi and La Vecchia 20 , Reference Fung, Hu and Holmes 22 , Reference Männistö, Dixon and Balder 23 , Reference Cottet, Touvier and Fournier 25 ). So far, no study has evaluated the relationship between the dietary patterns and BBD morbidity. Because of the high prevalence of these disorders in women( Reference Goehring and Morabia 5 ) and the risk of cancer development among them( Reference Hartmann, Sellers and Frost 2 ), we aimed to investigate the relationship between dietary patterns and BBD.

Methods

Study population

The present study is part of a case–control research project on women diagnosed with breast cancer and BBD, as well as healthy individuals attending the Iranian Center for Breast Cancer affiliated with Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR) in Tehran, from February 2014 to April 2015. The aim of the project was to compare the dietary patterns of patients with breast cancer and BBD with healthy women.

The sample size was calculated using an α of 0·05 and a power of 80 %, detecting a minimum significant outcome measure OR of 2·5. About eighty subjects were estimated for each of the three groups, and in practice eighty patients with breast cancer, ninety-six patients with BBD and seventy healthy women were recruited. As healthy subjects were not easily available, for maintaining the power of study, we increased the number of BBD patients to ninety-six. In the present study, we compared the dietary patterns in two groups of BBD patients and healthy women.

The cases were older than 20 years, diagnosed with BBD (including fibrocystic diseases, ductal ectasia, fat necrosis, papillomatosis, adenosis with and without sclerosing, fibroadenoma, ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia and atypical ductal hyperplasia) by the physicians of ACECR within the past 1 month. The controls were selected from women who accompanied patients or those who attended ACECR for check-up, and were diagnosed as healthy by the physicians, without any symptoms or complaints for BBD. We excluded individuals with BMI≥40 kg/m2, history of diagnosis with CVD, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, renal diseases, liver or gastrointestinal diseases, food allergy, stroke, fibromyalgia, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, current alcoholism or drug addiction, as well as self-reported withdrawal in the past 3 months, current pregnancy or lactation in the past 12 months. In total, ninety-six patients with BBD, aged 20–70 years, were selected as the case group and seventy non-diseased healthy individuals were selected as the control group using convenience sampling. The controls were healthy subjects who were visiting the centre for routine screening. By using frequency matching, the two groups were matched for age (age groups of 10 years) and menopause status.

Socio-demographic and lifestyle characteristics

Individual-specific information was collected via face-to-face interviews. Individual characteristics including age, residence status, educational level, job status, marital status, age at menarche, age at first full-term pregnancy, number of pregnancies, history of lactation, menopause status, history of oral contraceptive use and oestrogen therapy, family history of breast diseases, cigarette, hubble-bubble and tobacco-pipe smoking, vitamin and mineral supplement intake were recorded.

Anthropometric and physical activity measures

Weight was measured to the nearest 100 g with light clothing and without shoes using a weighing scale (Seca:813; Seca United Kingdom), and height was measured using a non-elastic measuring tape to the nearest 1 mm without shoes, heels together touching the wall and looking straight forward. BMI was calculated by dividing weight in kilograms by height in metres squared. Waist circumference (WC) was measured at a level midway between the lower rib margin and the iliac crest at the end of a gentle expiration and at standing position using a tape to the nearest 1 mm. In order to eliminate individual errors, the height, weight and WC were measured only by the first researcher.

International Physical Activity Questionnaire-short form was used to assess the level of physical activity of the participants( Reference Moghaddam, Aghdam and Jafarabadi 26 ). Individuals were asked about the frequency (d) and duration (min) of severe, moderate, jogging and sedentary physical activity during the past 7 d. To gain basic scoring, individuals must have at least 10 min of continuous physical activity. Physical activity score was calculated as metabolic equivalent task per minute per week (MET-min/week) for severe, moderate and jogging activities. The score of engaging in different levels of activity over the past week is calculated by multiplying the frequency of days by duration of time (min), as well as by constants of 8, 4 and 3·3, respectively. Finally, the sum of three scores was calculated as total exercise per week (total MET-min/week).

Dietary intake assessment

Usual dietary intake of individuals during the past year was assessed using a valid and reliable semi-quantitative FFQ from Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study( Reference Mirmiran, Hosseini Esfahani and Mehrabi 27 ). This 168-food-item questionnaire was completed via face-to-face interview by a trained dietitian. Dietary intake of six food groups including breads and cereals, meats, dairy products, vegetables, fruits and miscellaneous foods was assessed. Participants were asked to report the frequency of consumption for each food item in terms of daily (e.g. bread), weekly (e.g. rice and meat), monthly and yearly intakes. Reported food frequency was converted to daily intake (per gram) with respect to serving sizes( Reference Ghafarpour, Houshiar-Rad and Kianfar 28 ). Kitchen measuring cups were used to convert food servings. Food items were analysed for energy and nutrient contents using food composition tables (United States Department of Agriculture; USDA). Mixed foods were calculated according to their component ingredients.

Food groups and identifying dietary patterns

Food items were divided into twenty-five groups according to their composition and content (Table 1). The dietary patterns were extracted from questionnaires, based on the food intake data of the cases and controls. Extracted food groups were entered into the factor analysis, and dietary patterns were found according to principal component analysis. A change point in the scree plot was used to identify the number of patterns. With respect to inter-correlations among variables, factor loadings of >0·2 were considered to determine the number of food groups in each dietary pattern. Dietary patterns were labelled based on their food items (Table 2).

Table 1 Food grouping used in factor analysis

Table 2 Factor loadings of food groups for Healthy and Unhealthy dietary patternsFootnote *

* Factor loadings >0·2 are presented. Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy=0·83. Bartlett’s test of sphericity=<0·001

Statistical analysis

Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was applied to evaluate the normality of the data. Data analysis was performed using SPSS (version 16). Normally distributed quantitative variables, physical activity and qualitative variables were compared by independent t test, Mann–Whitney test and χ 2 test, respectively. As each participant received a factor score for each explored dietary pattern, we categorised the participants into tertiles of dietary pattern scores, so that each tertile contained approximately thirty individuals. Eventually, using logistic regression model with and without adjustment for different variables, the association of dietary patterns scores with BBD risk was assessed. The OR and 95 % CI were calculated for each dietary pattern tertile by logistic regression analysis. The relationship between the dietary patterns and BBD risk was adjusted for age, BMI, energy intake and confounders, with a P value<0·05 in logistic regression. P values<0·05 were considered significant.

Results

Table 3 provides general data for patients and healthy women. Mean age of cases and controls was 42·5 and 43·4 years, respectively, which was not significantly different. Mean age at first full-term pregnancy was significantly higher in cases compared with healthy controls, whereas the percentage of employed women and those who had taken oestrogen was significantly higher in controls than in cases (P<0·05) (Table 3). No other significant differences were observed. One of the patients was recognised with the history of tobacco use.

Table 3 Characteristics of participants with benign breast disease and the controls (Mean values and standard deviations; medians and interquartile ranges (IQR); numbers and percentages)

MET, metabolic equivalent task.

* Obtained by χ 2 test for categorical variables and by t test and Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables with normal and skewed distribution, respectively.

Two dietary patterns, entitled Healthy and Unhealthy, were obtained by factor analysis. Table 2 shows the factor loadings of food groups for the two dietary patterns, wherein the factor loadings >0·2 were reported. Higher factor loading of a given food group indicates the greater contribution of that specific food group in the dietary pattern. Two dominant dietary patterns explained 33 % of total variance. Healthy dietary pattern, with the variance of 25 %, consisted of fish, poultry, eggs, low-fat dairy products, cabbage, green leafy vegetables, yellow-orange vegetables, other types of vegetable, baked potato, legumes, nuts and seeds, whole grains, oil and mayonnaise, olives, fruits, dried fruits and fruit juices. Unhealthy dietary pattern, with the variance of 8 %, comprised red meats, organ and processed meats, high-fat dairy products, French fries, pickles (in vinegar or brine), refined grains, sweets and desserts, sugars and soda, tea and coffee, animal and solid fats and salted snacks. No significant differences were revealed when comparing frequency and tertile percentages of Healthy and Unhealthy dietary patterns in both case and control groups (P>0·05). The percentages of patients in the first, second and third tertiles of Healthy dietary pattern were 36·5, 33·3 and 30·2 %, respectively, whereas the percentages of healthy women were 24·3, 30·0 and 45·7 %, respectively. Regarding Unhealthy dietary pattern, the percentages of patients in the first, second and third tertiles were 33·3, 36·5 and 30·2 %, respectively, whereas the percentages of healthy women were 37·1, 28·6 and 34·3 %, respectively (Table 3).

The OR of BBD morbidity across tertiles of dietary pattern, before and after adjustment for confounding factors, is presented in four different models in Table 4. Before adjusting the confounders, subjects in the highest tertile had lower OR for BBD compared with those in the lowest tertile (model 1: OR 0·44; 95 % CI 0·2, 0·95). This relationship remained significant after adjusting for age, BMI and energy intake (model 2: OR 0·44; 95 % CI 0·20, 0·99). After adjusting for age at first pregnancy, job status and history of oestrogen therapy, the association remained close to significance level (model 3: OR 0·42; 95 % CI 0·17, 1·06). However, after addition of age, BMI and energy intake to the previous model, the association did not remain significant (model 4: OR 0·65; 95 % CI 0·24, 1·74).

Table 4 Benign breast diseases morbidity according to dietary patterns tertile (T) (Crude and adjusted odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals)

* Statistically significant.

Numbers represented the P valuetrend of OR in a row.

Model 1 was not adjusted.

§ All OR and their corresponding 95 % CI were calculated by performing logistic regression.

|| Model 2 was adjusted for age (years), BMI (kg/m2) and energy intake (kcal).

Model 3 was adjusted for age at first pregnancy (years), job status (employed/housekeeper) and history of oestrogen therapy (yes/no).

** Model 4 was adjusted for the variables included in the models 2 and 3.

No significant relationship was found between Unhealthy dietary pattern and BBD risk even after adjusting for potential confounders (P trend>0·05) (Table 4).

Discussion

In the current study, the association between dietary patterns and BBD morbidity was investigated for the first time. Our results showed that the Healthy dietary pattern might be inversely associated with BBD, although after adjusting for some confounding variables a clear relationship was not observed. Besides, no significant relationship was found between the Unhealthy dietary pattern and BBD.

In line with the present findings, a study in Australia showed that higher consumption of poultry, sea foods, leafy and red-brown vegetables and fruits is associated with a lower risk of BBD( Reference Ingram, Nottage and Roberts 10 ). In addition, Galvan-Portillo et al.( Reference Galvan-Portillo, Anchez and Lopez-Carrillo 8 ) reported that a higher fruit and dairy product intake could be related to a lower risk of BBD. Hislop et al.( Reference Hislop, Band and Deschamps 9 ) demonstrated a protective role against proliferative breast diseases with the intake of green vegetables. Consistent with these findings, in a case–control study, it was suggested that fruit and vegetable intake could be associated with a lower risk of fibrocystic breast disease, and the association was shown to be stronger in case of proliferative and atypical diseases, compared with non-proliferative conditions( Reference Wu, Ray and Lin 16 ). However, in a clinical trial for 7·7 years, low-fat dietary pattern with decreased fat intake to 20 % of total energy intake (decreased SFA intake to <7 % of total energy intake), increased fruit and vegetable intake to equal or more than five servings per d and increased cereal intake to six or more servings per d resulted in no-risk reduction of proliferative breast diseases( Reference Rohan, Negassa and Caan 15 ). The Healthy dietary pattern in our study consisted of food groups that might justify the reduction in BBD morbidity. Fruits and vegetables are rich in vitamins, antioxidants (e.g. vitamin C, vitamin E and β-carotene), minerals, fibre and other bioactive components. Antioxidants prevent DNA mutations and damage by eliminating free radicals( Reference Weisburger 29 ). Moreover, fruits and vegetables seem to contain ingredients with anti-proliferative effects on the breast epithelium( Reference Wu, Ray and Lin 16 ). Fibres reduce circulatory levels of oestrogen and thus prevent breast cell proliferation( Reference Baer, Schnitt and Connolly 6 ). These ingredients impede the reabsorption of oestrogen from the gastrointestinal tract( Reference Cohen 30 ), leading to increased levels of oestrogen-binding globulin and lower bioavailability of these molecules( Reference Goldin, Woods and Spiegelman 31 ). Nuts are rich sources of unsaturated fatty acids and bioactive ingredients (such as high-quality plant proteins, fibre, minerals, tocopherols, phytosterols and phenolic compounds) with a huge impact on health( Reference Ros 32 ), and they can reduce benign and progressive breast diseases( Reference Baer, Schnitt and Connolly 6 ). For instance, walnut contains bioactive compounds (α-linolenic acid and phytosterols) with anti-proliferative effects on breast epithelial cells( Reference Heuvel, Belda and Hannon 33 ).

According to our data, a higher intake of Unhealthy dietary pattern in crude and adjusted models was not associated with BBD risk. In Shanghai cohort study, intake of red meats, eggs, fried foods, dairy products (except for non-proliferative diseases), rice and other cereals (except for proliferative diseases) was not related to breast fibrocystic conditions( Reference Wu, Ray and Lin 16 ). Ingram et al.( Reference Ingram, Nottage and Roberts 10 ) showed that red meats, savoury foods (pizza, pie, stews, etc.) and starch are harmful for BBD. The consumption of fat from red meats was shown to be associated with proliferative forms of BBD in Canadian women( Reference Hislop, Band and Deschamps 9 ). We found no association between Unhealthy dietary pattern and BBD. This might stem from the recent transition in Iranian dietary patterns from traditional habits, which was similar to our Healthy dietary pattern, to new patterns resembling Western style or Unhealthy dietary pattern( Reference Ghassemi, Harrison and Mohammad 34 , Reference Galal 35 ). Therefore, it is possible that our participants consumed healthy foods in their childhood and adolescence and their habits changed to unhealthy diet in adulthood( Reference Ghassemi, Harrison and Mohammad 34 ). However, risky time period for the development of BBD is unknown, but childhood and adolescent diet may have a role in BBD incidence in adulthood( Reference Baer, Schnitt and Connolly 6 , Reference Ruder, Dorgan and Kranz 36 ). Moreover, some food ingredients from Unhealthy dietary pattern might reduce the BBD risk. For example, although red meats and high-fat dairy products contain SFA, which are associated with increased risk of BBD( Reference Hislop, Band and Deschamps 9 , Reference Lubin, Wax and Ron 13 ), retinol found in these foods reduces the risk( Reference Hislop, Band and Deschamps 9 , Reference Rohan, Cook and Potter 14 ). Furthermore, organ meats contain nutrients such as folate and methionine functioning in DNA methylation and thus prevent carcinogenesis( Reference Rohan, Jain and Howe 37 ). Therefore, there could be a relation between folate intake and proliferative BBD, as a precursor of breast cancer( Reference Lakhani 38 ).

The strength of the current study lies in selecting the patients who were diagnosed within the past month. This minimised the possible effect of the diagnosis on dietary patterns. In addition, it was a new research field on not only Iranian women but also in the globe. Nevertheless, our study had some limitations. First, by applying factor analysis in identifying the dietary patterns, food groups are categorised based on researcher’s decision and previous literature, and thus changing the type of categorisation could lead to different results. Second, response errors in FFQ are possible. Under- or over-reporting of food consumption may result in errors in accurate estimation of consumed food( Reference Kerver, Yang and Bianchi 39 ). However, in order to lower the bias, short-time interval between diagnosis and interview was used. Third, like all case–control studies, we could not determine the cause and effect relationship between the dietary patterns and BBD. Fourth, in spite of the high participation rate, samples may not be representative of the target population and selection bias is plausible. Regardless of these limitations, this study was the first attempt to examine the relationship between major dietary patterns and BBD.

For future studies, prospective designs are recommended to assess the relations between dietary patterns and BBD. In addition, larger sample size could be useful in studying dietary patterns with three subgroups of BBD separately. Also, the larger sample size may increase the chance to include more food groups to define dietary patterns in more detail.

According to the present findings, Healthy dietary pattern might be associated with a lower BBD risk; nevertheless, Unhealthy dietary pattern was not related to these diseases. However, this result should be interpreted with caution because of its limitations. Further studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely express their appreciation to the participants of this study.

This research project was supported by Tehran University of Medical Sciences, grant no. 93-454-111.

The authors’ contributions are as follows: Z. S. M. and G. S. contributed to the study design and revised the manuscript. Z. T., F. K., S. K. and F. D. contributed to data collection and wrote the manuscript. M. Q. and F. K. contributed to data analysis and interpretation of the data. All authors listed approved the content of the submitted manuscript.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

1. Hunt, KK, Green, MC & Buchholz, TA (2012) Diseases of the breast. In Sabiston Textbook of Surgery, 19th ed. pp. 824869 [CM Townsend, RD Beachamp, BM Evers and KL Mattox, editors]. St Louis, MO: WB Saunders.Google Scholar
2. Hartmann, LC, Sellers, TA, Frost, MH, et al. (2005) Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353, 229237.Google Scholar
3. Foulkes, R & Gateley, CA (2010) Management of benign diseases of the breast. Surgery (Oxford) 28, 125129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Courtillot, C, Plu-Bureau, G, Binart, N, et al. (2005) Benign breast diseases. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 10, 325335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Goehring, C & Morabia, A (1997) Epidemiology of benign breast disease, with special attention to histologic types. Epidemiol Rev 19, 310327.Google Scholar
6. Baer, HJ, Schnitt, SJ, Connolly, JL, et al. (2003) Adolescent diet and incidence of proliferative benign breast disease. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12, 11591167.Google Scholar
7. Baghurst, PA & Rohan, TE (1995) Dietary fiber and risk of benign proliferative epithelial disorders of the breast. Int J Cancer 63, 481485.Google Scholar
8. Galvan-Portillo, M, Anchez, LT-S & Lopez-Carrillo, L (2002) Dietary and reproductive factors associated with benign breast disease in Mexican women. Nutr Cancer 43, 133140.Google Scholar
9. Hislop, TG, Band, PR, Deschamps, M, et al. (1990) Diet and histologic types of benign breast disease defined by subsequent risk of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 131, 263270.Google Scholar
10. Ingram, D, Nottage, E & Roberts, T (1991) The role of diet in the development of breast cancer: a case-control study of patients with breast cancer, benign epithelial hyperplasia and fibrocystic disease of the breast. Br J Cancer 64, 187191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Li, W, Ray, RM, Lampe, JW, et al. (2005) Dietary and other risk factors in women having fibrocystic breast conditions with and without concurrent breast cancer: a nested case‐control study in Shanghai, China. Int J Cancer 115, 981993.Google Scholar
12. London, SJ, Stein, EA, Henderson, IC, et al. (1992) Carotenoids, retinol, and vitamin E and risk of proliferative benign breast disease and breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control 3, 503512.Google Scholar
13. Lubin, F, Wax, Y, Ron, E, et al. (1989) Nutritional factors associated with benign breast disease etiology: a case-control study. Am J Clin Nutr 50, 551556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Rohan, TE, Cook, MG, Potter, JD, et al. (1990) A case-control study of diet and benign proliferative epithelial disorders of the breast. Cancer Res 50, 31763181.Google ScholarPubMed
15. Rohan, TE, Negassa, A, Caan, B, et al. (2008) Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of benign proliferative breast disease: a randomized, controlled dietary modification trial. Cancer Prev Res 1, 275284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Wu, C, Ray, RM, Lin, MG, et al. (2004) A case-control study of risk factors for fibrocystic breast conditions Shanghai Nutrition and breast disease study, China, 1995–2000. Am J Epidemiol 160, 945960.Google Scholar
17. Frazier, AL & Rosenberg, SM (2013) Preadolescent and adolescent risk factors for benign breast disease. J Adolesc Health 52, 3640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Wu, AH, Mimi, CY, Tseng, C-C, et al. (2009) Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk in Asian American women. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 11451154.Google Scholar
19. Buck, K, Vrieling, A, Flesch-Janys, D, et al. (2011) Dietary patterns and the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in a German case–control study. Cancer Causes Control 22, 273282.Google Scholar
20. Edefonti, V, Randi, G, La Vecchia, C, et al. (2009) Dietary patterns and breast cancer: a review with focus on methodological issues. Nutr Rev 67, 297314.Google Scholar
21. Agurs-Collins, T, Rosenberg, L, Makambi, K, et al. (2009) Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk in women participating in the Black Women’s Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr 90, 621628.Google Scholar
22. Fung, TT, Hu, FB, Holmes, MD, et al. (2005) Dietary patterns and the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. Int J Cancer 116, 116121.Google Scholar
23. Männistö, S, Dixon, LB, Balder, HF, et al. (2005) Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk: results from three cohort studies in the DIETSCAN project. Cancer Causes Control 16, 725733.Google Scholar
24. Sieri, S, Krogh, V, Pala, V, et al. (2004) Dietary patterns and risk of breast cancer in the ORDET cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13, 567572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Cottet, V, Touvier, M, Fournier, A, et al. (2009) Postmenopausal breast cancer risk and dietary patterns in the E3N-EPIC prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 170, 12571267.Google Scholar
26. Moghaddam, MHB, Aghdam, FB, Jafarabadi, MA, et al. (2012) The Iranian Version of International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) in Iran: content and construct validity, factor structure, internal consistency and stability. World Appl Sci 18, 10731080.Google Scholar
27. Mirmiran, P, Hosseini Esfahani, F, Mehrabi, Y, et al. (2010) Reliability and relative validity of an FFQ for nutrients in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Public Health Nutr 13, 654662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Ghafarpour, M, Houshiar-Rad, A & Kianfar, H (1999) The Manual for Household Measures, Cooking Yields Factors and Edible Portion of Foods, p. 49. Tehran: Nashre Olume Keshavarzy. [In Persian]Google Scholar
29. Weisburger, J (1999) Mechanisms of action of antioxidants as exemplified in vegetables, tomatoes and tea. Food Chem Toxicol 37, 943948.Google Scholar
30. Cohen, L (1998) Dietary fiber and breast cancer. Anticancer Res 19, 36853688.Google Scholar
31. Goldin, BR, Woods, MN, Spiegelman, DL, et al. (1994) The effect of dietary fat and fiber on serum estrogen concentrations in premenopausal women under controlled dietary conditions. Cancer 74, 11251131.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Ros, E (2010) Health benefits of nut consumption. Nutrients 2, 652682.Google Scholar
33. Heuvel, JPV, Belda, BJ, Hannon, DB, et al. (2012) Mechanistic examination of walnuts in prevention of breast cancer. Nutr Cancer 64, 10781086.Google Scholar
34. Ghassemi, H, Harrison, G & Mohammad, K (2002) An accelerated nutrition transition in Iran. Public Health Nutr 5, 149155.Google Scholar
35. Galal, O (2002) Nutrition-related health patterns in the Middle East. Asia Pacific J Clin Nutr 12, 337343.Google Scholar
36. Ruder, EH, Dorgan, JF, Kranz, S, et al. (2008) Examining breast cancer growth and lifestyle risk factors: early life, childhood, and adolescence. Clin Breast Cancer 8, 334342.Google Scholar
37. Rohan, TE, Jain, MG, Howe, GR, et al. (2000) Dietary folate consumption and breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 92, 266269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38. Lakhani, SR (1999) The transition from hyperplasia to invasive carcinoma of the breast. J Pathol 187, 272278.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. Kerver, JM, Yang, EJ, Bianchi, L, et al. (2003) Dietary patterns associated with risk factors for cardiovascular disease in healthy US adults. Am J Clin Nutr 78, 11031110.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Food grouping used in factor analysis

Figure 1

Table 2 Factor loadings of food groups for Healthy and Unhealthy dietary patterns*

Figure 2

Table 3 Characteristics of participants with benign breast disease and the controls (Mean values and standard deviations; medians and interquartile ranges (IQR); numbers and percentages)

Figure 3

Table 4 Benign breast diseases morbidity according to dietary patterns tertile (T) (Crude and adjusted odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals)