Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:03:41.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of the availability and ileal digestibility of lysine in cottonseed and soya-bean meals for grower/finisher pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

E. S. Batterham ,
L. M. Andersen ,
D. R. Baigent ,
R. E. Darnell  and
M. R. Taverner
E. S. Batterham
Affiliation:
NSW Agriculture and Fisheries, North Coast Agricultural Institute, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2480, Australia
L. M. Andersen
Affiliation:
NSW Agriculture and Fisheries, North Coast Agricultural Institute, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2480, Australia
D. R. Baigent
Affiliation:
NSW Agriculture and Fisheries, North Coast Agricultural Institute, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2480, Australia
R. E. Darnell
Affiliation:
NSW Agriculture and Fisheries, North Coast Agricultural Institute, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2480, Australia
M. R. Taverner
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Animal Research Institute, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The availability of lysine and the ileal digestibility of amino acids in three cottonseed meals and a soya-bean meal for grower/finisher pigs were determined. The usefulness of the availability estimates for formulating diets was assessed. The availability of lysine, as assessed with a slope-ratio assay, was (proportion of total): cottonseed meal no. 1, 0.27; no. 2, 0.30, no. 3, 0.29; soya-bean meal, 0.90. Heal digestibility of lysine in the meals (proportion of total) was: cottonseed meal no. 1, 0.58; no. 2, 0.68; no. 3, 0.72; soya-bean meal, 0.89. Pigs given diets formulated to the same available lysine concentration grew at similar rates and retained the same amount of lysine in the carcasses. The results indicate that, for meals of high availability (soya-bean meal), reduced ileal digestibility appears to be the main reason for reduced availability. However, in meals of low availability (cottonseed meal), reduced ileal digestibility only accounts for part of the reduced availability. Thus, the ileal digestibility of lysine is not a reliable indicator of lysine availability.

Keywords

LysineIleal digestibilityAvailabilityCottonseed mealSoya-bean mealPigs
Type
Amino Acid Availability
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , November 1990 , pp. 663 - 677
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1990

References

Agricultural Research Council (1981). The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Allen, E., Johnson, A. R., Fogerty, A. C., Pearson, J. A. & Shenstone, F. S. (1967). Inhibition by cyclopropene fatty acids of the desaturation of stearic acid in hen liver. Lipids 2, 419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baligna, B. P. & Lyman, C. M. (1957). Preliminary report on the nutritional significance of bound gossypol in cottonseed meal. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society 34, 21.Google Scholar
Batterham, E. S. (1979). Lupinus albus cv. Ultra and Lupinus angustifolius cv. Unicrop as protein concentrates for growing pigs. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 369–375.Google Scholar
Batterham, E. S., Andersen, L. M., Lowe, R. F. & Darnell, R. E. (1986). Nutritional value of lupin (Lupinus albus)-seed meal for growing pigs: availability of lysine, effect of autoclaving and net energy content. British Journal of Nutrition 56, 645–659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batterham, E. S. & Murison, R. D. (1981). Utilization of free lysine by growing pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 46, 87–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batterham, E. S., Murison, R. D. & Andersen, L. M. (1984). Availability of lysine in vegetable protein concentrates as determined by the slope-ratio assay with growing pigs and rats and by chemical techniques. British Journal of Nutrition 51, 85–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batterham, E. S., Murison, R. D. & Lewis, C. E. (1979). Availability of lysine in protein concentrates as determined by the slope-ratio assay with growing pigs and rats and by chemical techniques. British Journal of Nutrition 41, 383–391.Google Scholar
Bjarnason, J. & Carpenter, K. J. (1969). Mechanisms of heat damage in proteins. I. Models with acylated lysine units. British Journal of Nutrition 23, 859–868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burlacu, G., Baia, G., Ionila, D., Moisa, D., Tascenco, V., Visan, I. & Stoica, I. (1973). Efficiency of the utilization of the energy of food in piglets after weaning. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 295–302.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G., Taverner, M. R. & Rayner, C. J. (1988). The tissue and dietary protein and amino acid requirements of pigs from 8.0 to 20.0 kg live weight. Animal Production 46, 283–290.Google Scholar
Craig, W. M. & Broderick, G. A. (1981). Effect of heat treatment on true digestibility in the rat, in vitro proteolysis and available lysine content of cottonseed meal protein. Journal of Animal Science 52, 292–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finney, D. J. (1964). Statistical Method in Biological Assay, 2nd ed. London: Griffin.Google Scholar
Ford, J. E. & Shorrock, C. (1971). Metabolism of heat-damaged proteins in the rat. Influence of heat damage on the excretion of amino acids and peptides in the urine. British Journal of Nutrition 26, 311–322.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. J. & Wilson, K. J. (1982). Amino acid analyses using isocratic and gradient elution modes on Kontron AS-70 (7 μm) resin. Journal of Chromatography 242, 337–341.Google Scholar
Hugli, T. E. & Moore, S. (1972). Determination of the tryptophan content of proteins by ion exchange chromatography of alkaline hydrolysates. Journal of Biological Chemistry 247, 2828–2834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurrell, R. F., Carpenter, K. J., Sinclair, W. J., Otterburn, M. S. & Asquith, R. S. (1976). Mechanisms of heat damage in proteins. 7. The significance of lysine-containing isopeptides and of lanthionine in heated proteins. British Journal of Nutrition 35, 383–395.Google Scholar
Jordan, J. W. & Brown, W. O. (1970). The retention of energy and protein in the baby pig fed on cows' milk. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, pp. 161–164 [Schurch, A. and Wenk, C., editors]. Zürich: Juris.Google Scholar
Leibholz, J. (1986). The utilization of lysine by young pigs from nine protein concentrates compared with free lysine in young pigs fed ad lib. British Journal of Nutrition 55, 179–186.Google ScholarPubMed
Sauer, W. C. & Ozimek, L. (1986). Digestibility of amino acids in swine: results and their practical applications. A review. Livestock Production Science 15, 367–388.Google Scholar
Standing Committee on Agriculture (1987). Feeding Standards for Australian Livestock. Pigs. East Melbourne: CSIRO.Google Scholar
Tanksley, T. D. & Knabe, D. A. (1981). Use of cottonseed meal in swine rations. Feedstuffs 53, 24–27.Google Scholar
Taverner, M. R. (1982). Nutritive value for pigs of white lupins (L. albus cv. Hamburg). Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 14, 667.Google Scholar
Taverner, M. R., Curie, D. M. & Rayner, C. J. (1983). A comparison of the extent and site of energy and protein digestion of wheat, lupin and meat and bone meal by pigs. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 34, 122–128.Google Scholar
Taverner, M. R., Hume, I. D. & Farrell, D. J. (1981). Availability to pigs of amino acids in cereal grains. 2. Apparent and true ileal availability. British Journal of Nutrition 46, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varnish, S. A. & Carpenter, K. J. (1975). Mechanisms of heat damage in proteins. 5. The nutritional values of heat-damaged and propionylated proteins as sources of lysine, methionine and tryptophan. British Journal of Nutrition 34, 325–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed