Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T03:25:15.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Body fat in lean and overweight women estimated by six methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

G. McNeill ,
P. A. Fowler ,
R. J. Maughan ,
B. A. McGaw ,
M. F. Fuller ,
D. Gvozdanovic  and
S. Gvozdanovic
G. McNeill
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
P. A. Fowler
Affiliation:
Department of Bio-medical Physics and Bio-engineering, University of Aberdeen, Forresterhill, Aberdeen AB2 9ZD
R. J. Maughan
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Forresterhill, Aberdeen AB2 9ZD
B. A. McGaw
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
M. F. Fuller
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
D. Gvozdanovic
Affiliation:
Department of Bio-medical Physics and Bio-engineering, University of Aberdeen, Forresterhill, Aberdeen AB2 9ZD
S. Gvozdanovic
Affiliation:
Department of Bio-medical Physics and Bio-engineering, University of Aberdeen, Forresterhill, Aberdeen AB2 9ZD
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Body fat content of seven lean women (body mass index (BMI) 20.6 (sd1.8) kg/m2) and seven overweight women (BMI 31.1 (sd 3.3) kg/m2) was estimated by six different methods: underwater weighing (UWW), body-water dilution (BWD), whole-body counting (40K), skinfold thickness (SFT), bio-electrical impedance (BEI) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Using UWW as the reference method, the differences between percentage fat by each other method and the percentage fat by UWW were calculated for each subject. The mean difference was lowest for SFT and highest for BWD. MRI showed the lowest variability in individual results, and 40K the highest. 40K and BWD methods used in combination gave better agreement with UWW results than either 40K or BWD methods alone. There was a weak negative correlation between the difference from the UWW results and percentage fat in the SFT measurements, but not in the BWD, 40K, BEI or MRI measurements, suggesting that for these methods the assumptions involved produced no greater inaccuracy in the overweight women than in the lean women. In all subjects the BEI offered little improvement over the traditional SFT measurements. The agreement between MRI and UWW estimates in both lean and overweight women suggests that MRI may be a satisfactory substitute for the more established methods of body fat estimation in adult women.

Keywords

Body compositionMethodologyObesity
Type
Body Composition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , March 1991 , pp. 95 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1991

References

REFERENCES

Bland, J. M. & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet i, 307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, A., Andersson, M., Arvidson, B. & Isaksson, B. (1980). Body composition. Prediction of normal body potassium, body water and body fat in adults on the basis of body height, body weight and age. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation 40, 461–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durnin, J. V. G. A. & Womersley, J. (1974). Body fat assessed from total body density, and its estimation from skinfold thickness. British Journal of Nutrition 32, 77–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, M. A., Hutchison, J. M. S., Mallard, J. R. & Fuller, M. F. (1984). Nuclear magnetic resonance pulse sequence and discrimination of high- and low-fat tissues. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2, 187–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fowler, P. A., Casey, C. E., Cameron, G. G., Foster, M. A. & Knight, C. H. (1990 a). Cyclic changes in composition and volume of the breast during the menstrual cycle, measured by magnetic resonance imaging. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 97, 595–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fowler, P. A., Knight, C. H., Cameron, G. G. & Foster, M. A. (1990 b). Use of magnetic resonance imaging in the study of goat mammary glands in vivo. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 89, 359–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrow, J. S. (1974). Energy Balance and Obesity in Man. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland.Google Scholar
Garrow, J. S. (1988). Obesity and Eating Disorders. London: Churchill Livingstone.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrow, J. S., Garby, L. & Lammert, O. (1990). Comparison of estimates of fat-free mass in normal and obese women from measurements of body potassium, body water and body density. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 44, 213–217.Google ScholarPubMed
Gvozdanovic, S. & Gvozdanovic, D. (1987). Total body potassium measurements in subjects of ‘abnormal’ body shapes. Hospital Physicists Association Proceedings of 44th Annual Conference, Liverpool, p. 40. London: Hospital Physicists' Association.Google Scholar
Kryzwicki, H. J., Ward, G. M., Rahman, D. P., Nelson, R. A. & Consolazio, C. F. (1974). A comparison of methods for estimating human body composition. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 27, 1380–1385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvist, H., Chowdhury, B., Sjostrom, L., Tylen, U. & Cederblad, A. (1988). Adipose tissue volume determination in males by computed tomography and 40K. International Journal of Obesity 12, 249–266.Google ScholarPubMed
Lukaski, H. C., Mendez, J., Buskirk, E. R. & Cohn, S. H. (1981). A comparison of methods of assessment of body composition including neutron activation analysis of total body nitrogen. Metabolism 30, 777–782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNeill, G., Fowler, P. A., Maughan, R. J., McGaw, B. A., Gvozdanovic, S., Gvozdanovic, D. & Fuller, M. F. (1989). Body fat in lean and obese women measured by six methods. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 48, 23A.Google Scholar
Maughan, R. J., Haggarty, P., McGaw, B. A., Gvozdanovic, D. & Gvozdanovic, S. (1988). Measurement of body composition in lean athletic women. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 47, 112A.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. B. & Burkinshaw, L. (1983). Estimation of non-fat body tissues from measurements of skinfold thickness, total body potassium and total body nitrogen. Clinical Science 65, 407–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pace, N. & Rathbun, E. N. (1945). Studies on body composition. III. The body water and chemically combined nitrogen content in relation to fat content. Journal of Biological Chemistry 158, 685–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pittet, P. G., Stalley, S. F., Hesp, R. & Halliday, D. (1978). Body composition of women assessed by five methods. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 37, 86A.Google ScholarPubMed
Redpath, T. W., Hutchison, J. M. S., Eastwood, L. M., Selbie, R. D., Johnson, G., Jones, R. A. & Mallard, J. R. (1987). A low field NMR imager for clinical use. Journal of Physics and Electronics: Scientific Instrumentation 20, 1228–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoeller, D. A., Ravussin, E., Schutz, Y., Acheson, K. J., Baertschi, P. & Jequier, E. (1986). Energy expenditure by doubly labelled water: validation in humans and proposed calculation. American Journal of Physiology 250, R823–R860.Google ScholarPubMed
Schoeller, D. A., van Santen, E., Peterson, D. W., Dietz, W., Jaspan, J. & Klein, P. D. (1980). Total body water measurement in humans with 18O and 2H labelled water. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 33, 2686–2693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheng, H.-P. & Huggins, R. A. (1979). A review of body composition studies with emphasis on total body water and fat. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 32, 630–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siri, W. E. (1961). In Techniques for Measuring Body Composition, pp. 223–245 [Brozek, J. & Henschel, A., editors]. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science/National Research Council.Google Scholar
Watson, P. E., Watson, I. D. & Batt, R. D. (1980). Total body water volumes for adult males and females estimated from simple anthropometric measurements. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 33, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, J. D., Hesp, R. & Garrow, J. S. (1984). The composition of excess weight in obese women, estimated by body density, total body water and total body potassium. Human Nutrition: Clinical Nutrition 38C, 299–306.Google Scholar
Wilmore, J. H., Vodak, P. A., Parr, R. B., Girandola, R. N. & Billing, J. E. (1980). Further simplification of a method for determination of residual lung volume. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 12, 216–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Womersley, J., Boddy, K., King, P. L. & Durnin, J. V. G. A. (1972). A comparison of the fat-free mass of young adults estimated by anthropometry, body density and total body potassium content. Clinical Science 43, 469–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, W. W., Cabrera, M. P. & Klein, P. D. (1984). Evaluation of a new dual mass spectrometer system for rapid simultaneous determination of 2H/1H and 18O/16O ratios in aqueous samples. Analytical Chemistry 56, 1852–1858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar