Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:40:43.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biotin status, blood pyruvate carboxylase (EC 6.4.1.1) activity and performance in broilers under different conditions of bird husbandry and diet processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

C. C. Whitehead
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council's Poultry Research Centre, King's Buildings, West Maim Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JS
D. W. Bannister
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council's Poultry Research Centre, King's Buildings, West Maim Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JS
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Three experiments were conducted to investigate the relationships between blood pyruvate carboxylase (pyruvate: carbon dioxide ligase (ADP-forming), EC 6.4.1.1; PC) activity, growth performance and dietary biotin level in broilers under different husbandry conditions. Blood PC activity was also used to gain information on the ingestion of biotin of faecal origin by birds housed on wood shavings and the effect of steam-pelleting on the biotin content of diets.

2. Blood PC activity and relationship to dietary biotin level were similar in birds kept under different husbandry conditions.

3. Biotin requirement for growth was higher in birds kept under conditions that allowed them to reach their growth potential more fully.

4. The contribution of biotin of faecal origin to the biotin intake of birds housed on wood shavings was negligible at 3 weeks of age but by 7 weeks was equivalent to approximately 0.01 mg/kg diet.

5. Steam-pelleting did not affect the stability or availability of biotin of natural or synthetic origin in diets.

6. It is concluded that blood PC activity is a good criterion of biotin status and requirement in fast-growing

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1980

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. O. & Warnick, R. E. (1970). Poult. Sci. 49, 569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannister, D. W. & Whitehead, C. C. (1976). Int. J. Biochem. 7, 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, R., Whitehead, C. C. & Teague, P. W. (1975). Res. vet. Sci. 18, 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, M. E., Ford, J. E. & Harrison, G. F. (1968). Br. J. Nutr. 22, 493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frigg, M. (1976). Poult. Sci. 55, 2310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frigg, M. (1977). Verh. Schweiz. nnturf Ges. 157, 340.Google Scholar
Gompertz, B. (1825). Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 115, 513.Google Scholar
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J. (1951). J. biol. Chem. 193, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, C. C. (1977). Wld's Poult. Sci. J. 33, 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, C. C. & Bannister, D. W. (1978 a). Br. J. Nutr. 39, 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, C. C. & Bannister, D. W. (1978 b). Proc. XVI Wld's Poult. Congr., Rio de Janeiro, p. 1927.Google Scholar
Wright, L. D. & Skeggs, H. R. (1944). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 56, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar