Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:10:30.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selection Procedures Used by Peripatetic Instrumental Teachers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Extract

The article begins with a justification of peripatetic instrumental teaching in maintained schools, and counters the two-pronged attack of financial cuts by local education authorities, and the accusation of ‘elitism’.

Much of the information concerning selection for instrumental tuition was gathered by means of a questionnaire amongst the peripatetic staff from nine L.E.A.s. A summary of the results appears in the article.

One of the main recommendations suggests the setting up of a ‘preliminary instrumental course’, which uses the results of the investigation to provide a more efficient method of selection.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

A.M.M.A. 1984 Music: an Endangered Subject? London, Assistant Masters and Mistresses Association.Google Scholar
Bentley, A. 1966 Music Ability in Children. London, Harrap.Google Scholar
Bentley, A. 1975 Music in Education. London, N.F.E.R.Google Scholar
Ben-Tovim, A. 1979 Children and Music. London, A. & C. Black.Google Scholar
Booth Davies, J. 1978. The Psychology of Music. London, Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Cooper, D. J. 1983 Orchestral Instrumental Tuition in State Schools, with Particular Reference to the Selection Procedures Used by Peripatetic Instrumental Teachers. Unpublished M.Ed. thesis, Birmingham University.Google Scholar
Davies, B. M. 1980 Enquiry into Instrumental Education of Young Orchestral Players. Unpublished M.Ed. thesis, Cardiff University.Google Scholar
Douglas, J. W. B. 1964. The Home and the School. London, Panther Books.Google Scholar
Farmer, P. 1977 A state of inequality. Time Educational Supplement, 4 02.Google Scholar
Farmer, P. 1979 Music in the Comprehensive School. London, O.U.P.Google Scholar
Farmer, P. 1984. Post-punk wind of comprehensive change, The Teacher, 20 01.Google Scholar
Gulbenkian Report 1978 Training Musicians. London, Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.Google Scholar
Harding, M. 1983. Once a teacher (report by Thomas, S.), Times Educational Supplement, 10 06.Google Scholar
Maxwell Davies, P. 1983 Pied Piper seizes a platform (report by ‘Aristides’), Times Educational Supplement, 10 06.Google Scholar
Mawbey, W. E. 1973. ‘Wastage from instrumental classes in schools.’ In Psychology of Music, vol. 1. p. 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paynter, J. 1982 a ‘A long standing controversy.’ In ‘Music Extra’ Times Educational Supplement, 2 07.Google Scholar
Paynter, J. 1982 b Music in the Secondary School Curriculum. Cambridge, C.U.P.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. 1976An investigation of the relationship between musicality and intelligence.’ In Psychology of Music, vol. 4, pp. 1631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rural Music Schools Association 1977. The Suzuki Investigation in Hertfordshire. London, R.M.S.A. Bedford Square Press.Google Scholar
Schools Council 1968. Enquiry One: Young School Leavers. London, H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Sergeant, D. C. & Thatcher, G. 1974. ‘Intelligence, social status and musical abilities.’ In Psychology of Music, vol. 2 (2), pp. 3257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuter, R. 1968. The Psychology of Musical Ability. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Shuter-Dyson, R. & Gabriel, C. 1981. The Psychology of Musical Ability, 2nd ed.London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Suzuki, S. 1969, Nurtured by Love. New York, Exposition Press.Google Scholar
Tempest, N. R. 1974 Teaching Clever Children, 7–11. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wearmouth, J. B: 1982 Instrumental Teaching in Northampton Schools. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of London Institute of Education:Google Scholar