Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:25:04.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regional Anaesthesia versus General Anaesthesia in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: The Surgical Nursing Interventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2009

T. Fotis ,
A. Mitsos ,
T. Perdikides ,
E. Lambrinou  and
E. Konstantinou
T. Fotis*
Affiliation:
Vascular Surgical Department, 251 Hellenic Airforce Hospital, Athens, Greece
A. Mitsos
Affiliation:
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Major, Neurosurgeon, 401 Army Hospital, Athens, Greece
T. Perdikides
Affiliation:
Vascular Surgical Department, 251 Hellenic Airforce Hospital, Athens, Greece
E. Lambrinou
Affiliation:
TEPAK, Faculty of Nursing, Nicosia, Cyprus
E. Konstantinou
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, Athens University, Athens, Greece
*
Correspondence to: T. Fotis, RN, BSc, MSc, PhD Candidate, P.O. Box 1323, 19009 Pikermi Attikis, Greece. Tel: 00302106035260, Fax: 00302106035260, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Background:

Minimally invasive surgical techniques are a revolutionary and innovative approach to the practice of surgery. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) may offer a number of significant advantages in comparison with conventional open surgical repair.

Aim:

The purpose of this study was to compare regional anaesthesia (RA) and general anaesthesia (GA) in EVAR, and to describe the surgical nursing interventions.

Methods:

This included a retrospective analysis of 160 consecutive patients (age 55 to 96 years) who underwent EVAR under: epidural anaesthesia (EDA = 60 patients), combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia (Combined = 40 patients) and GA = 60 patients.

Results:

Results were successful in all patients and no mortality was noticed. Among the GA group, 11 patients needed ICU support while only 5 from the other 2 groups. Furthermore, a statistically significant difference regarding median hospital stay was also noticed in favour of the regional group.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, RA is a safe and effective anaesthetic method for endovascular repair of abdominal aneurysms, offering several advantages including simplicity, haemodynamic stability, less need for ICU management and reduced hospital stay. The anaesthetic nurse can play a major role in the management of this anaesthesia throughout the procedure.

Keywords

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)general anaesthesiaregional anaesthesiasurgical nursing
Type
Original Article
Information
British Journal of Anaesthetic & Recovery Nursing , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , February 2009 , pp. 11 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © British Association of Anaesthetic and Recovery Nursing 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, B. Anesthesia and endovascular surgery. Best Practice and Research. Clinical Anesthesiology 2002; 16 (1): 95–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bettex, DA, Lachat, M, Pfammatter, T, Schmidlin, D. To compare general, epidural and local anaesthesia for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2001; 21 (2): 179–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, P, Zannetti, S, Parlani, G, Verzini, F, Caporali, S, Spaccatini, A. Epidural anesthesia reduces length of hospitalization after endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1999; 30 (4): 651–657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, N, Stanley, T. Anesthesia for vascular surgery In: Miller R. (ed.) Anesthesia (4th edn). New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1994, 1851–1895.Google ScholarPubMed
Hall, S. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. AORN Journal 2003; 77 (3): 631–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hertzer, N, Beven, E, Young, J. Coronary artery disease in peripheral vascular patients: a classification of 1000 angiograms and results of surgical management. Annals of Surgery 1984; 199: 223–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horlocker, T, Wedel, D. Neuraxial block and low-molecular-weight heparin: balancing perioperative analgesia and thromboprophylaxis. Regional Anesthesia Pain Medicine 1998; 23 (2): 164–177.Google ScholarPubMed
Kozon, V, Fortner, N, Holzenbein, T. An empirical study of nursing in patients undergoing two different procedures for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Journal of Vascular Nursing 1998; 16 (1): 1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latessa, V. Endovascular stent-graft repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms: the nursing implications for care. Journal of Vascular Nursing 2002; 20 (3): 86–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parra, J, Crabtree, T, McLafferty, R, Ayerdi, J, Gruneiro, L, Ramsey, D. Anesthesia technique and outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair. Annals of Vascular Surgery 2005; 19 (3): 123–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramage, D, Lovell, M, Derose, G. Establishing an endovascular abdominal aortic program – decisions, decisions, decisions: The London Health Sciences Centre experience. Journal of Vascular Nursing 2001; 19 (1): 10–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruppert, V. Influence of anesthesia type on outcome after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: an analysis based on EUROSTAR data. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2006; 44 (6): 16–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, E. Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing 2000; 15 (4): 256–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walschot, L, Laheij, R, Verbeek, A. Outcome after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a meta-analysis. Journal of Endovascular Therapy 2002; 9: 82–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed