Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:05:40.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Financial Economics — an Investment Actuary's Viewpoint

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

R.S. Clarkson
R.S. Clarkson
Affiliation:
Cherrybank, Manse Brae, Dalserf, Larkhall, Lanarkshire, ML9 3BN, U.K. Tel: +44 (0)1698 882451
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper compares and contrasts the theories and methodologies of financial economics with generalisations drawn from practical experience of institutional investment management. A Dynamic Equilibrium Model is put forward as a much more realistic theoretical framework than the Sharpe Diagonal Model, a downside theory of risk is developed from sports analogies, and a detailed model of human behaviour, incorporating benchmark levels of ‘unintelligent’, ‘intelligent’, ‘optimal’ and ‘rational’ behaviour, is suggested as a replacement for the very restrictive simplifying assumptions of existing theories. On the basis of a classification system derived from parallels with the history of astronomy, it is concluded that, as a scientific framework, the current theories of financial economics are seriously incomplete, the two crucial areas of incompleteness being the absence of a downside theory of risk and the absence of a realistic model of human behaviour under conditions of risk and uncertainty.

Keywords

Financial EconomicsInvestmentRiskUncertaintyRational BehaviourModern Portfolio TheoryEfficient Market HypothesisUtility TheoryStochastic Models
Type
Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions
Information
British Actuarial Journal , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , 01 October 1996 , pp. 809 - 972
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bawva, V. & Lindenberg, E. (1977). Capital market equilibrium in a mean-lower partial moment framework. Journal of Financial Economics, 5, No 2, 189–200.Google Scholar
Black, F. (1972). Capital market equilibrium with restricted borrowing. Journal of Business, 45, No 3, 444–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, M.J. (1970). Taxes, market valuation and corporate financial policy. National Tax Journal, 23, No 4, 417–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, M.J. (1971). Capital market equilibrium with divergent borrowing and lending rates. Journal of Financial and Qualitative Analysis, 6, No 5, 1197–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyl, E. (1975). Negative betas: the attractions of selling short. Journal of Portfolio Management, 1, No 3, 1174–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, S. & Stiglitz, J. (1976). Information and competitive price systems. American Economic Review, 66, No 2, 246–253.Google Scholar
Kraus, A. & Lintzenberger, R. (1976). Skewness preference and the valuation of risk assets. Journal of Finance, 31, No 4, 1085–1100.Google Scholar