Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:25:15.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Re-examination of the Distribution of Oxfordshire and New Forest Wares

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

David Dungworth
David Dungworth
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Durham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
Britannia , Volume 24 , November 1993 , pp. 255 - 257
Copyright
Copyright © David Dungworth 1993. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

77 I am grateful to M. Millett, S. Esmonde Cleary, and M. Fulford who read and commented on earlier drafts of this note. However, the views expressed here are those of the author.

78 Fulford, M.G. and Hodder, I.R., ‘A regression analysis of some late Romano-British pottery: a case study’, Oxoniensia xxxix (1975). 28–35.Google Scholar

79 Hodder, I. R., ‘Regression analysis of some trade and marketing patterns’, World Archaeology vi (1974), 172–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

80 op. cit. (note 78), 31.

81 Compare distribution maps showing the extent of the potteries, e.g. Fulford, M.G., New Forest Roman Pottery, BAR 17 (1975), fig. 1Google Scholar, and Young, C.J., The Roman Pottery Industry of the Oxfordshire Region, BAR 43 (1977), fig. 2.Google Scholar

82 Nicholson, P. and Patterson, H., ‘Pottery making in Upper Egypt: an ethnoarchaeological study’, World Archaeology xvii (1987), 222–39.Google Scholar

83 D.P.S. Peacock, Pottery in the Roman World: an Ethnoarchaeological Approach (1982), 42–3.

84 P.M. Rice, Pottery Analysis: A Sourcebook (1987), 184.

85 Fulford, op. cit. (note 81), 12.

86 A.H.M. Jones, The Later Roman Empire (1964), 860.

87 Young, op. cit. (note 81), Appendix 1.

88 Fulford, op. cit. (note 81), Appendix 1.

89 The result has been calculated in miles for comparison with the original data. In metric units the distance would be 24.3 km.