Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:58:05.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Continuity and Religious Practices in Roman Britain: The Case of the Rural Religious Complex at Marcham/Frilford, Oxfordshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2010

Zena Kamash
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University of Oxford, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Chris Gosden
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University of Oxford, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Gary Lock
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University of Oxford, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Abstract

This paper presents the interim results of Oxford University's on-going excavations at the Roman religious complex at Marcham/Frilford, Oxfordshire. This site has been the focus of debates about continuity from the Iron Age into the Roman period since the original excavations at the temple by Bradford and Goodchild in the 1930s. New findings from the current excavations are brought to bear on this question, in particular how the Iron Age activity influenced the design and layout of the Roman complex. In addition, the paper uses preliminary analysis of the finds from the excavations to discuss the nature of religious practices and activities at the site.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2010. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Akerman, J.Y. 1865: ‘Report on excavations in an ancient cemetery at Frilford’, Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of London 3, 136–41Google Scholar
Aldhouse-Green, M. 2004: An Archaeology of Images: Iconology and Cosmology in Iron Age and Roman Europe, London and New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, N. 1994: ‘The London amphitheatre’, Current Archaeology 137, 164–71Google Scholar
Booth, P. 2001: ‘Late Roman cemeteries in Oxfordshire: a review’, Oxoniensia 66, 1342Google Scholar
Boyer, G.K. 2006: Roman Villas in the Landscape, unpub. MSc dissertation, Kellogg College, Oxford UniversityGoogle Scholar
Boyle, A. 2004: ‘Riding into history’, British Archaeology 76 (May), 22–7Google Scholar
Bradford, J.S.P., and Goodchild, R.G. 1939: ‘Excavations at Frilford, Berks, 1937–8’, Oxoniensia 4, 180Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 1976: ‘Maumbury Rings, Dorchester: the excavations of 1908–1913’, Archaeologia 105, 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 1990: The Passage of Arms, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Calkins, R.G. 1978: ‘Grave goods from the Frilford cemetery at Cornell University’ in Farrell, R.T. (ed.), Bede and Anglo-Saxon England, Oxford, 148–72Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. 1988: The Temple of Sulis Minerva at Bath. Vol. 2, The Finds from the Sacred Spring, Oxford University Committee for Archaeology Monograph 16, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Davies, J.A. 1985: The Roman Coins from Lowbury Hill, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Deniger, V. 1997: Amphitheatres of Roman Britain: a Study of their Classes, Architectures and Uses, unpub. MA thesis, Dept of Classics, Queen's University, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Drury, P.J. 1980: ‘Non-Classical religious buildings in Iron Age and Roman Britain: a review’ in Rodwell, W. (ed.), Temples, Churches and Religion in Roman Britain, BAR British Series 77, Oxford, 4578Google Scholar
Dudley-Buxton, L. 1920: ‘Excavations at Frilford’, Antiquaries Journal 1, 8797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C., and Hodder, I. 2006: A Woodland Archaeology: Neolithic Sites at Haddenham, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Fulford, M. 1989: The Silchester Amphitheatre: Excavations of 1979–85, Britannia Monograph 10, LondonGoogle Scholar
Fulford, M. 2001: ‘Links with the past: pervasive “ritual” behaviour in Roman Britain’, Britannia 32, 199218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Futrell, A. 1997: Blood in the Arena: The Spectacle of Roman Power, Austin, TexasGoogle Scholar
Garner, D., and Wilmott, T. 2007: ‘Let the games begin: the Chester Amphitheatre project’, British Archaeology 93 (March/April), 1015Google Scholar
Golvin, A.L. 1988: L'Amphithéâtre romain: essai sur la théorisation de sa forme et de ses fonctions, ParisGoogle Scholar
Goodchild, R., and Kirk, J.R. 1954: ‘The Romano-Celtic temple at Woodeaton’, Oxoniensia 19, 1537Google Scholar
Gosden, C., and Lock, G. 2003: ‘Frilford: a Romano-British ritual pool in Oxfordshire?’, Current Archaeology 184, 156–9Google Scholar
Gosden, C., and Lock, G. (with Bailey, R., Bukach, D., Fluck, H., Harrison, J., Kamash, Z., Langford, M., Levick, P., Lewis, H., Majewski, J., Raven, S., Smallridge, J., Warry, P., Wheeler, C. and Yates, S.) 2005: ‘The Vale and Ridgeway Project: excavations at Marcham/Frilford 2004’, South Midlands Archaeology 35, 94105Google Scholar
Harding, D.W. 1972: The Iron Age in the Upper Thames Basin, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Harding, D.W. 1987: Excavations in Oxfordshire 1964–66, University of Edinburgh Department of Archaeology Occasional Paper 15, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
Harker, S. 1980: ‘Springhead – a brief reappraisal’ in Rodwell, W. (ed.), Temples, Churches and Religion in Roman Britain, BAR British Series 77, Oxford, 285–8Google Scholar
Haverfield, F. 1897: ‘A Roman villa at Frilford’, Archaeological Journal 54, 340–54Google Scholar
Henig, M. 1984: Religion in Roman Britain, LondonGoogle Scholar
Henig, M., and Booth, P., with Allen, T. 2000: Roman Oxfordshire, StroudGoogle Scholar
Hingley, R. 1982: ‘Recent discoveries of the Roman period at the Noah's Ark Inn, Frilford, South Oxfordshire’, Britannia 13, 305–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hingley, R. 1985: ‘Location, function and status: a Romano-British “religious complex” at the Noah's Ark Inn, Frilford (Oxfordshire)’, Oxford Journal of Archaeology 4 (2), 201–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hingley, R. 2006: ‘The deposition of iron objects in Britain during the later prehistoric and Roman periods: contextual analysis and the significance of iron’, Britannia 37, 213–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, N. 1998: Cirencester: the Roman Town Defences, Public Buildings and Shops, Cirencester Excavations 5, CirencesterGoogle Scholar
Hull, M.R. 1958: Roman Colchester, Research Report Society of Antiquaries of London 20, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamash, Z. 2008: ‘What lies beneath? Perceptions of the ontological paradox of water’, World Archaeology 40.2, 224–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamash, Z., Gosden, C., and Lock, G. (with contributions by Daly, P., Harrison, J., Levick, P., Lewis, H., Majewski, J. and Raven, S.) 2007: ‘The Vale and Ridgeway Project: excavation at Marcham/Frilford 2006: interim report’, South Midlands Archaeology 37, 61–4Google Scholar
Kamash, Z., Gosden, C., and Lock, G. (with contributions by Harrison, J., Levick, P., Smallridge, J. and Raven, S.) 2008: ‘The Vale and Ridgeway Project: excavations at Marcham/Frilford 2007: interim report’, South Midlands Archaeology 38, 6876Google Scholar
Lock, G., Gosden, C., Griffiths, D., Daly, P., Trifkovic, V., and Marston, T. 2002: ‘Hillforts of the Ridgeway Project: excavations at Marcham/Frilford 2001’, South Midlands Archaeology 32, 6983Google Scholar
Lock, G., Gosden, C., Griffiths, D., and Daly, P. 2003: ‘Hillforts of the Ridgeway Project: excavations at Marcham/Frilford 2002’, South Midlands Archaeology 33, 8491Google Scholar
Lock, G., and Gosden, C. (with Bukach, D., Daly, P., Griffiths, D., Levick, P., Majewski, J., Raven, S., Warry, P., Wheeler, C. and Yates, S.) 2004: ‘The Ridgeway and Vale Project: excavations at Marcham/Frilford 2003 – interim report’, South Midlands Archaeology 34, 8494Google Scholar
Lock, G., and Gosden, C. (with contributions by Daly, P., Bukach, D., Kamash, Z., Levick, P., Majewski, J., Raven, S., Bendall, L., Harrison, J., Lewis, H., Otiende, E., Iminjili, V. and Yeates, S.) 2006: ‘The Vale and Ridgeway Project: excavations at Marcham/Frilford 2005: interim report’, South Midlands Archaeology 36, 5571Google Scholar
Mattingly, D.J. 2006: An Imperial Possession: Britain in the Roman Empire, LondonGoogle Scholar
Mawer, C.F. 1995: Evidence for Christianity in Roman Britain: The Small Finds, BAR British Series 243, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Merrifield, R. 1987: The Archaeology of Ritual and Magic, LondonGoogle Scholar
Nibblett, R. 1999: The Excavation of a Ceremonial Site at Folly Lane, Verulamium, Britannia Monograph 14, LondonGoogle Scholar
Penn, W.S. 1958: ‘The Romano-British settlement at Springhead: excavation of the Watling St, shop and pedestal, site B’, Archaeologia Cantiana 72, 77110Google Scholar
Penn, W.S. 1959: ‘The Romano-British settlement at Springhead: temple 1, site C 1’, Archaeologia Cantiana 73, 161Google Scholar
Penn, W.S. 1961: ‘Springhead: temples III and IV’, Archaeologia Cantiana 74, 113–40Google Scholar
Penn, W.S. 1962: ‘Springhead: temples II and V’, Archaeologia Cantiana 77, 110–32Google Scholar
Penn, W.S. 1964: ‘Springhead: the temple ditch site’, Archaeologia Cantiana 79, 170–89Google Scholar
Penn, W.S. 1965: ‘Springhead – map of discoveries’, Archaeologia Cantiana 80, 107–17Google Scholar
Penn, W.S. 1968: ‘Springhead: temples VI/gateway’, Archaeologia Cantiana 83, 105–23Google Scholar
Petts, D. 2003: Christianity in Roman Britain, StroudGoogle Scholar
Rolleston, G. 1869: ‘Researches and excavations at an ancient cemetery at Frilford’, Archaeologia 42, 417–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolleston, G. 1880: ‘Further researches in an Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Frilford’, Archaeologia 45, 405–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. 2001: The Differential Use of Constructed Space in Southern Britain from the Late Iron Age to the 4th Century AD, BAR British Series 318, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. 2006: ‘Differing interpretations of the Romano-British site at Marcham/Frilford, Oxfordshire’ in Henig, M. (ed.), Roman Art, Religion and Society, BAR International Series 1577, Oxford, 91115Google Scholar
Thompson, F.H. 1976: ‘The excavation of the Roman amphitheatre at Chester’, Archaeologia 105, 127239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, R.S.O. 1988: ‘The curse tablets’ in Cunliffe 1988, 59277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacher, J.S. 1963: ‘Cirencester 1962: third interim report’, Antiquaries Journal 43, 1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacher, J.S. 1964: ‘Cirencester 1963: fourth interim report’, Antiquaries Journal 44, 918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedlake, W.J. 1982: The Excavation of the Shrine of Apollo at Nettleton, Wiltshire, 1956–1971, Research Report Society of Antiquaries of London 40, LondonGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, R.E.M., and Wheeler, T.V. 1928: ‘The Roman amphitheatre at Caerleon, Monmouthshire’, Archaeologia 28, 111218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, R.E.M., and Wheeler, T.V. 1936: Verulamium: A Belgic and Two Roman Cities, Research Report Society of Antiquaries of London 11, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, G.M. 1936: ‘The Chichester amphitheatre: preliminary excavations’, Antiquaries Journal 16, 149–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, H. 1994: The Artefact Assemblage at Lowbury Hill: a Comparison with other Rural Temple Sites, unpub. dissertation, University of SheffieldGoogle Scholar
Williams, H., and Bradley, R. 1998: The Past in the Past: The Re-use of Ancient Monuments, LondonGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D.R. 1973: ‘Temples in Britain: a topographical survey’, Caesarodunum 8 (Pour Une Géographie Sacrée de l'Occident Romain), 2244Google Scholar
Woodward, A., and Leach, P. 1993: The Uley Shrines: Excavations of a Ritual Complex on West Hill, Uley, Gloucestershire: 1977–9, English Heritage Archaeological Report 17, LondonGoogle Scholar