Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:43:20.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease: Is It a Unified Phenomenon?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Anja Lowit*
Affiliation:
Division of Speech and Language Therapy, Department of Educational and Professional Studies, Strathclyde University, Scotland.
Peter Howell
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University College, London, England.
Bettina Brendel
Affiliation:
Division of Speech and Language Therapy, Department of Educational and Professional Studies, Strathclyde University, Scotland.
*
Address for correspondence: Anja Lowit, Division of Speech and Language Therapy, Department of Educational and Professional Studies, Strathclyde University, 76 Southbrae Drive, Glasgow G13 1PP, Scotland. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) has long been associated with dementia. This has been found to correlate with participant age, age at onset of PD and severity of PD. In addition, a large corpus of research points to the fact that participants with, as well as without, dementia can be impaired in a variety of cognitive tasks. Among these, set-shifting and dual-tasking skills have received particular focus. Most studies report that a reduction in attentional resources can lead to problems with these tasks. However, none have been able to determine exactly which systems are involved in these skills and which neurological impairments underlie the observed cognitive deficits. The current study set out to investigate how performance on tasks requiring set-shifting and dual tasking related to each other, as well as overall measures of cognition gained across a variety of tasks. Fifteen participants with PD and 12 control participants underwent screening tests for dementia, as well as specific tests to assess attention, set-shifting and dual tasking. The results indicate that set-shifting ability correlated well with other measures of cognitive performance, whereas dualtasking skills did not. This could suggest that set-shifting and dual tasking are not necessarily controlled by the same process, or that a particular process is involved to different degrees. In addition, many participants showed individual performance variations and dissociations between tasks that were not necessarily evident from the statistical analysis. This indicates that it can be difficult to make assumptions on overall cognitive performance from specific tasks and vice versa. This observation has implications for clinical practice as well as research methodology.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)