No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Catholics into Politics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 October 2024
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
The discussion between Father Aelred Graham and Mr Douglas Woodruff—with Father John Fitzsimons intervening—seems to me to be typical of the sort of controversy that arises in almost any Catholic gathering of today when the subject of politics is introduced, though to be sure it is on a much higher dialectical plane than most. There is a great temptation to join in and develop the many fascinating but well-worn themes that have been raised in ever-widening circles round the original splash; but it would be unprofitable, if only because it has been done so often and much better before. What I am going to attempt is something much more presumptuous, that is to break out of the circle, which however wide is still a constriction of both Catholic thought and action.
First, may I offer a definition of politics? It is, I suggest, the art of the organisation of society for the common good. And the problem that does, or should, face the politician is how to preserve the liberty of the individual while securing the common good of all.
It is surely clear that the successful organisation of society for the common good must depend on the members of this or that society having a fairly unanimous idea of what is the common good for which they strive, and on their living and carrying out this organisation within a common structure or framework as to the essentials of which they are all more or less agreed. As Christopher Hollis has said, quoting and supporting Cecil Chesterton, ‘party government is only tolerable when the two parties agree in their political opinions’. Furthermore, as Fr Graham rightly enjoins, they must ‘see things steadily and see them whole’.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1949 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers
References
1 History of the United States, pp. 227, 228.
2 The Two Nations, p. 113.
3 Blackfriars, March, 1949, p. 108.
4 The Two Nations, p. 113.
5 Sybil, Book ii, Ch. 5.
6 An Introduction to the History of England, p. 11.
7 Blackfriars, March, 1949, p. 108.
8 Ibid., May, 1949, p. 210.
9 Ibid., p. 220.
10 Ibid., March, 1949, p. 109.
11 Pius XII. Allocution of February 20th. 1946. ‘The Vital Principle of Human Society’—Tablet, March 2nd, 1946, p. 108.
12 Father John J. Hugo. In the Vineyard (U.S.A., 1912). p. 2.
13 Blackfriars, May, 1949, p. 217.
14 Growth or Decline (Fides Publishers, Montreal, 1949). p. 56.
15 Ibid., p. 62.
16 Rinascita Christiana, January 22nd, 1947.
17 Discourse at the Grand Retour, 1946. Quoted by Cardinal Suhard in op. cit. p. 64.
18 Pius XII. Allocution of February 20th, 1946.
19 Blackfriars, May, 1949, p. 210.
20 Ibid., p. 205.
21 Bowman v. Secular Society, 1917. Appeal Cases, 452, 464. ‘My Lords, in all respect for the great names of the lawyers who have used it, the phrase “Chris. tianity is part of the law of England” is really not law: it is rhetoric’. Lord Sumner giving leading judgment for the majority.
22 The Two Nations, pp. 42–52.
23 Catholic Encyclopaedia, New York, 1910. ‘Gilds’.
24 The Tablet, November 2nd, 1946. Leading article: ‘Diffused Ownership’, p. 223.
25 Blackfriars, May, 1949, p. 205.
26 Ibid., July, 1948, p. 307.
27 Matthew, v., 2.
28 Cardinal Suhard, op. cit., p. 83.
You have
Access