Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:27:50.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Barriers to the Use of the Mental Health Treatment Requirement as Part of a Community-Based Criminal Sentence for Mentally Disordered Offenders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2022

Fatima Saleem
Affiliation:
St George's University, London, United Kingdom
Hector Blott*
Affiliation:
South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Due to the high rates of mental disorder in prison there have been a number of initiatives to divert mentally disordered offenders out of custody. One of these is the Mental Health Treatment Requirement (MHTR): a criminal sentence available as part of a Community Order, offered as an alternative to short-term custodial sentences in an attempt to address recidivism and encourage concordance with community psychiatric treatment. In spite of the prevalence of mental disorder amongst offenders, MHTRs represent less than 1% of all community sentences. Here we aim to identify obstacles to the use of the MHTR at sentencing and to suggest ways of overcoming them.

Methods

A literature review and brief case series will be used to identify and illustrate what may be obstructing or limiting the use of the MHTR. The terms ‘MHTR’ and ‘Mental Health Treatment Requirement’ were searched on Google, Google Scholar, Athens, and PubMed, and results analysed for recurrent themes. The issues encountered clinically by one of the authors who referred three defendants for MHTRs in psychiatric sentencing reports in 2021 were reviewed with the same purpose.

Results

The main barriers to the use of the MHTR which were identified were issues related to a lack of clinician awareness and experience, homelessness and housing, and service structure and provision. There may be a reluctance for Community Mental Health Teams (CMHTs) to accept offenders onto their caseloads, and there are challenges in obtaining assessments and recommendations for MHTRs. There are difficulties in securing an MHTR for homeless defendants on remand for whom identifying housing prior to sentencing, and thus a CMHT to supervise the MHTR, can be challenging. The MHTR assessment and referral process is more lengthy and cumbersome than that for most other disposals, leaving the defendant awaiting sentencing (potentially in custody) while the referral is processed.

Conclusion

Suggested solutions to improve access to the MHTR include increasing clinician awareness and confidence by providing teaching and training, and multi-agency meetings to enhance communication and create an understanding amongst professionals of duties, roles, and responsibilities. Initiatives to identify housing for homeless remand prisoners before their release, as well as ensuring the availability of community services to supervise treatment, would overcome some of the obstacles identified and increase availability of the MHTR. Funding for additional staff to conduct the assessment and referrals process would also be likely to improve uptake.

Type
Education and Training
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.