Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:14:13.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relative density and habitat use of four pheasant species in Xiaoshennongjia Mountains, Hubei Province, China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2004

WANG NAN
Affiliation:
College of Life science Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China. E-mail: [email protected]
ZHANG ZHENGWANG
Affiliation:
College of Life science Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China. E-mail: [email protected]
ZHENG GUANGMEI
Affiliation:
College of Life science Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China. E-mail: [email protected]
PHILIP J.K. MCGOWAN
Affiliation:
World Pheasant Association, 7–9 Shaftesbury Street, Fordingbridge, Hampshire SP6 1RJ, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many species of China's Galliformes live in forests and it is often difficult to assess populations of species in these habitats. Such assessments are becoming increasingly important because much of China's forest has been altered through logging and other forms of human activity. After describing and mapping habitat types, we assessed two commonly used methods for counting pheasants (transects and point counts at dawn) in the Xianshennongjia Mountains in the Three Gorges area of Hubei Province in east-central China. Four pheasant species were recorded: Golden Pheasant Chrysolophus pictus, Temminck's Tragopan Tragopan temmincki, Koklass Pucrasia macrolopha and Common (or Ring-necked) Pheasant Phasianus colchicus. Golden Pheasants were detected most often by calls heard during transects and Koklass were recorded mostly during point counts at dawn. Temminck's Tragopan was detected during transects (by sightings) and also by calls at dawn. The relatively few Common Pheasants that were detected were registered mainly during transects. Golden Pheasants were found at the lowest altitudes, closest to human habitation and both Temminck's Tragopan and Koklass lived in various forest types above this. Common Pheasant was found in meadows at higher altitudes. We conclude that the methods used can determine general habitat use, but that no one method is likely to prove sufficient to unravel the detailed pattern of habitat use across all four species. In particular, further study is required to assess the relative importance of different forest types to Golden Pheasant, Temminck's Tragopan and Koklass. It would appear that human impact on the forest has affected the distribution of the pheasant species. For example, Common Pheasant is now absent from low-lying areas and occurs at what appears to be an unusually high altitude in the study area.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
BirdLife International 2004