Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:41:35.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of rearing experience on subsequent behavioural traits in Hawaiian Geese Branta sandvicensis: implications for the recovery programme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

Ann P. Marshall  and
Jeffrey M. Black
Ann P. Marshall
Affiliation:
The Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust, Slimbridge, Gloucester, GL2 7BT, U.K.
Jeffrey M. Black
Affiliation:
The Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust, Slimbridge, Gloucester, GL2 7BT, U.K.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The risk of the Nene Branta sandvicensis becoming extinct has been minimized by the release of over 2,000 captive-reared geese, but the population (now at 500) is yet to achieve a self-sustaining status. The majority of birds released have been reared in gosling-only groups, thus missing out on the opportunity to learn social and feeding skills from adults. In this paper we test the hypothesis that rearing experience affects the subsequent behavioural traits of Nene goslings. We raised 42 goslings under four conditions: a gosling group not exposed to adults, a gosling group exposed to adults from 16 days onward, three groups in view of “foster” adults for 14 days, and four groups reared continuously by parents. All birds were eventually released into an 8 ha pen where a flock of adult Nene roamed. The method by which Nene goslings were raised had a significant effect on dominance, flock integration, and vigilance. Parent-reared birds were dominant to and more vigilant than goslings raised without parents or goslings reared in sight of adults. Parent-reared birds also integrated into the adult flock sooner than other goslings. Growth rate and final body size were not affected by rearing regime (with or without parents or foster parents). In future, managers should provide goslings with as much “parental” experience as possible in order to equip them with appropriate skills to cope once released in the wild.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bird Conservation International , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 131 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © Birdlife International 1992

References

Baldwin, P. H. (1945) The Hawaiian Goose, its distribution and reduction in numbers. Condor 47: 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banko, P. C. (1988) Breeding biology and conservation of the Nene, Hawaiian goose (Nesochen sandvicensis). Ph.D. diss., University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Banko, W. E. and Elder, W. H. (1989) Population histories: species accounts, subgrass-land birds: Hawaiian Goose, Nene. University of Hawaii and Manoa. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Beck, B. B., Castro, I., Kleiman, D. G., Dietz, J. M., and Rettberg-Beck, B. (1988) Preparing captive-born primates for reintroduction. lnternatn. J. Primatol. 8: 426.Google Scholar
Berger, A. J. (1978) Reintroduction of Hawaiian geese. Pp. 339–344 in Temple, S. A., ed. Endangered birds: management techniques for preserving threatened species. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, and London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Black, J. M. (1988) Preflight signalling in swans: a mechanism for group cohesion and flock formation. Ethology 79: 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. M. (1990) The Nene recovery initiative. The Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust and the Hawaiian Department of Forestry and Wildlife, unpublished.Google Scholar
Black, J. M. (1991) Reintroduction and restocking: guidelines for bird recovery program-mes. Bird Conserv. lnternatn. 1: 329–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. M. and Barrow, J. H. Jr, (1985) Visual signalling in Canada geese for the coordination of family units. Wildfowl 36: 35–41.Google Scholar
Black, J. M. and Owen, M. (1984) Importance of family unit to Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis offspring — a progress report. Nor. Polarinst. Skr. 181: 79–85.Google Scholar
Black, J. M. and Owen, M. (1987) Determinants of social rank in goose flocks: acquisition of social rank in young geese. Behaviour 102: 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. M. and Owen, M. (1989a) Parent-offspring relationships in wintering barnacle geese. Anim. Behav. 37: 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. M. and Owen, M. (1989b) Agonistic behaviour in barnacle goose flocks: assessment, investment and reproductive success. Anim. Behav. 37: 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. M., Duvall, F., Hoshide, H., Mederios, J., Natividad Hodges, C.Santos, N. and Telfer, T. (1991) The current status of the Hawaiian Goose Branta sandvicensis and its recovery programme. Wildfowl 42: 149–154.Google Scholar
Boag, P. T. (1987) Effects of nestling diet on growth and adult size of Zebra Finches (Poephila guttata). Auk 104: 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cade, T. J. (1986) Reintroduction as a method of conservation. Raptor Res. Rep. 5: 72–84.Google Scholar
Collias, N. E. and Jahn, L. R. (1959) Social behavior and breeding success in Canada geese Branta canadensis confined under semi-natural conditions. Auk 76: 478–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooch, E. G., Lank, D. B., Rockwell, R. F. and Cooke, F. (1989) Long-term decline in fecundity in a Snow Goose population: evidence for density-dependence? J. Anim. Ecol. 58: 711–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooch, E. G., Lank, D. B., Dzubin, A., Rockwell, R. F. and Cooke, F. (in press) Body size variation in lesser snow geese: environmental plasticity in gosling growth rates. Ecology.Google Scholar
Dahlgren, J. (1990) Females choose vigilant males: an experiment with the monogamous grey partridge, Perdix perdix. Anim. Behav. 39: 646–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devick, W. S. (1981a) Status of the Nene population of the Island of Hawaii between 1975 and 1980. Unpublished report to DOFAW-DLNR, Hawaii.Google Scholar
Devick, W. S. (1981b) Status of the Nene population on Maui between 1975 and 1980. Unpublished report to DOFAW-DLNR, Hawaii.Google Scholar
Dowell, S. (1988) Some effects of the method of rearing on the behaviour and ecology of grey partridges. The Game Conservancy 1987 Annual Review. 125–132.Google Scholar
Dowell, S. (1989) Rearing partridges that will avoid predation. The Game Conservancy Review. 98.Google Scholar
Elder, W. H. and Woodside, D. H. (1958) Biology and management of the Hawaiian goose. Trans. North Amer. Wildl. Conf. 23: 198–215.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. H., Dobrott, S. J. and Goodwin, J. G. Jr, (1978) Reintroduction techniques for masked bobwhites. Pp. 345–354 in Temple, S. A., ed. Endangered birds: management techniques for preserving threatened species. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, and London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Fyfe, R. W. (1978) Reintroducing endangered birds to the wild: a review. Pp. 323–329 in Temple, S. A., ed. Endangered birds: management techniques for preserving threatened species. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, and London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Gassmann-Duvall, R. (1987) An acute Cyathostoma bronchialis outbreak in the Hawaiian goose and other parasite findings. Pp. 61–68 in Proceedings of Conference of Avian Veterinarians and American Association of Zoo Veterinarians. Oaha, Hawaii.Google Scholar
Kear, J. and Berger, A. J. (1980) The Hawaiian goose: an experiment in conservation. Vermil-lion S.D.: Buteo Books.Google Scholar
Kenward, R. (1978) Hawks and doves: attack success and selection in goshawk flights at wood pigeons. J. Anim. Ecol. 47: 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiman, D. (1989) Reintroduction of captive mammals for conservation: guidelines for reintroducing species into the wild. BioScience 39: 152–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamprecht, J. (1989) Mate guarding in geese: awaiting female receptivity, protection of paternity or support of female feeding? Pp. 48–66 in Rasa, A. E.Vogel, C. and Voland, E., eds. The sociobiology of sexual and reproductive strategies. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Larsson, K. and Forslund, P. (1991) Environmentally induced morphological variation in the barnacle goose, Branta leucopsis. J. Evol. Biol. 4: 619–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, J. and Inglis, I. R. (1978) The breeding behaviour of the Pink-footed goose: parental care and vigilant behaviour during the fledgling period. Behaviour 65: 62–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, J., Bregnballe, T. and Mehlum, F. (1989) Study of the breeding ecology and behavior of the Svalbard population of light-bellied brent goose (Branta bernida hrota). Polar Research 7: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P. and Bateson, P. (1986) Measuring behaviour: an introductory guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morin, M. and Walker, R. (1986) The Nene restoration plan. DLNR-Division of Forestry and Wildlife. Unpublished report.Google Scholar
Owen, M. and Wells, R. (1979) Territorial behaviour in breeding geese — a reexamination of Ryder's hypothesis. Wildfowl 30: 20–26.Google Scholar
Pulliam, H. R. and Caraco, T. (1984) Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? Pp. 122–147 in Krebs, J. R. and Davies, N. B., eds. Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Second edition. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Radesater, T. (1974) Form and sequential associations between the triumph ceremony and other behaviour patterns in the Canada Goose Branta canadensis L. Ornis Scand. 5: 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E. (1984) Components of variance in measurements of nestling European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in southeastern Pennsylvania. Auk 101: 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E., Bruning, D. F. and Archibald, G. W. (1986) Growth rates of cranes reared in captivity. Auk 103: 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. D. (1952) The Hawaiian Goose (Nene) restoration program. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 16: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahlberg, B. M. (1974) The development of rank order and aggressiveness in a group of juvenile greylag geese. Wildfowl 25: 67–73.Google Scholar
Stone, C. P., Walker, R. L., Scott, J. M. and Banko, P. C. (1983) Hawaiian goose research and management — where do we go from here? Elepaio 44: 11–15.Google Scholar
Temple, S. A. (1978) Reintroducing birds of prey to the wild. Pp. 355–363 in Temple, S. A., ed. Endangered birds: management techniques for preserving threatened species. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, and London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Teunissen, W., Spaans, B. and Drent, R. (1985) Breeding success in brent in relation to individual feeding opportunities during spring in the Wadden Sea. Ardea 73: 109–119.Google Scholar
Witteman, G. J. and Pimm, S. L. (1991) The risk of extinction: lessons to be learned from introduced species. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Zwank, P. J., Geaghan, J. P. and Dewhurst, D. A. (1988) Foraging differences between native and released Mississippi sandhill cranes: implications for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2: 387–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar