Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:26:04.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acquisition of article semantics by child and adult L2-English learners*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

TANIA IONIN ,
MARÍA LUISA ZUBIZARRETA  and
VADIM PHILIPPOV
TANIA IONIN*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
MARÍA LUISA ZUBIZARRETA
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
VADIM PHILIPPOV
Affiliation:
Orel State University (Russia)
*
Address for correspondence: Tania Ionin, Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 4080 Foreign Languages Building, 707 South Mathews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801, USA[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines article use in the L2-English of adult and child speakers of Russian, an article-less language. In earlier work on articles in adult L2-English, Ionin, Ko and Wexler (2004) proposed that speakers of article-less L1s fluctuate between dividing English articles on the basis of definiteness vs. specificity, as a result of direct access to semantic universals. The present paper examines whether similar fluctuation is present for child L2-English learners. Results of an elicitation study with L1-Russian child and adult learners of English show that both groups of learners exhibit sensitivity to definiteness as well as specificity. At the same time, it is found that the behavior of child L2-learners is more consistent with natural language data than that of adult L2-learners. It is proposed that both children and adults have domain-specific knowledge of semantic universals, but that adults, unlike children, also use explicit strategies. This proposal is considered in light of the literature on explicit vs. implicit knowledge.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , July 2009 , pp. 337 - 361
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We would like to thank our undergraduate research assistants, Jomeline Balatayo, Erin Bardales, Anna Bokarius, Erin Kunkle and Matthew Wallace for their help with the data collection and analysis in the U.S., and students at Orel State University for their help with the data collection in Russia. We are grateful to William Rutherford for allowing us the use of his cloze test for measuring L2-learners' proficiency. The research reported here is supported by NSF grant # BCS-0444088 (Principal Investigator: María Luisa Zubizarreta) and by a University of Southern California undergraduate research grant. We are grateful to Silvina Montrul and to three anonymous reviewers for comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References

Aissen, J. (2003). Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 21 (3), 435–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. (1981). Roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1989). Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (ed.) (1999). Second language acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blass, R. (1990). Relevance relations in discourse: A study with special reference to Sissala. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). The logical problem of second language learning. In Gass & Schachter (eds.), pp. 41–68.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis, 20, 3–49.Google Scholar
Blom, E. & Polišenská, D. (2006). Verbal inflection and verb placement in first and second language acquisition. In Vliegen, M. (ed.), Variation in Sprachtheorie und Spracherwerb: Akten des 39. Linguistischen Kolloquiums in Amsterdam 2004 (Linguistik International 16), pp. 1–10. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bošković, Ž. (2005). On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica, 59, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Y. G. (2002). Second language learners’ theories on the use of English articles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 451–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corver, N. (1992). Left branch extraction. In Broderick, K. (ed.), Proceedings of NELS 22, pp. 67–84. Amherst. MA: GSLA.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (eds.), Focus on form in second language acquisition, pp. 42–63. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533.Google Scholar
Diesing, M. (1992). Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dirdal, H. (2005). Second language acquisition of articles and plural marking by Bengali learners of English. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Donnellan, K. S. (1966). Reference and definite descriptions. The Philosophical Review, 75, 281–304. [Reprinted in Steinberg, D. & Jakobovits, L. (eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics, and psychology, pp. 100–114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971.]Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enç, M. (1991). The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 1–25.Google Scholar
Ferrari-Bridgers, F. (2004). The semantics–syntax interface of Luganda initial vowel. Presented at the 35th Annual Conference on African Linguistics (ACAL), Harvard University, April 2004.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. D. & Sag, I. A. (1982). Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy, 5, 355–398.Google Scholar
Fuli, L. T. (2007). Definiteness vs. specificity: An investigation into the terms used to describe articles in Gagana Samoa. Master's thesis, the University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Gass, S. & Schachter, J. (eds.) (1989). Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1981). On the development of the numeral “one” as an indefinite marker. Folia Linguistica Historica, 2 (1), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (2001). Syntax (vol. 1). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goad, H. & White, L. (2004). Ultimate attainment of L2 inflections: Effects of L1 prosodic structure. In Foster-Cohen, S., Sharwood Smith, M., Sorace, A. & Ota, M. (eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 4, pp. 119–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gregg, K. (1989). Second language acquisition theory: The case for a generative perspective. In Gass & Schachter (eds.), pp. 15–40.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., Al-Eid, S., Almahboob, I., Athanasopoulos, P., Chaengchenkit, R., Hu, J., Rezai, M., Jaensch, C., Jeon, Y., Jiang, A., Leung, Y.-K., Matsunaga, K., Ortega, M., Sarko, G., Snape, N. & Velasco-Zárate, K. (2006). Accounting for English article interpretation by L2 speakers. In Foster-Cohen, S. H., Medved Krajnovic, M. & Mihaljević Djigunović, J. (eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook, pp. 7–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Heim, I. (1991). Artikel und Definitheit [Articles and definiteness]. In von Stechow, A. & Wunderlich, D. (eds.), Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung/Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, pp. 487–535. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herschensohn, J. (2007). Language development and age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huebner, T. (1983). A longitudinal analysis of the acquisition of English. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Huebner, T. (1985). System and variability in interlanguage syntax. Language Learning, 35, 141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T. (2003). Article semantics in second language acquisition. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. [Distributed by MITWPL.]Google Scholar
Ionin, T. (2006). This is definitely specific: Specificity and definiteness in article systems. Natural Language Semantics, 14, 175–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., Ko, H. & Wexler, K. (2003). Specificity as a grammatical notion: Evidence from L2-English article use. In Garding, G. & Tsujimura, M. (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 22, pp. 245–258. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Ionin, T., Ko, H. & Wexler, K. (2004). Article semantics in L2-acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition, 12, 3–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., Ko, H. & Wexler, K. (2007). The role of semantic features in the acquisition of English articles by Russian and Korean speakers. In Liceras, J. M., Zobl, H. & Goodluck, H. (eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition, pp. 226–268. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ionin, T. & Montrul, S. (2009). Article use and generic reference: Parallels between L1 and L2 acquisition. In Mayo, M. d. P. García & Hawkins, R. (eds.), Second language acquisition of articles: Empirical findings and theoretical implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [In press in July 2009.]Google Scholar
Ionin, T., Zubizarreta, M. L. & Bautista Maldonado, S. (2008). Sources of linguistic knowledge in the second language acquisition of English articles. Lingua, 118, 554–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. & Newport, E. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, J. & Newport, E. (1991). Critical period effects on universal properties of languages: The status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language. Cognition, 39, 215–258.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). A functional approach to child language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelepir, M. (2001). Topics in Turkish syntax: Clausal structure and scope. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. [Distributed by MITWPL.]Google Scholar
Ko, H., Ionin, T. & Wexler, K. (2006). Adult L2-learners lack the maximality presupposition, too! In K. U. Deen, J. Nomura, B. Schulz & B. D. Schwartz (eds), Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition–North America (GALANA 1; University of Connecticut Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4), pp. 171–182. Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar
Krifka, M., Pelletier, F. J., Carlson, G., ter Meulen, A., Chierchia, G. & Link, G. (1995). Genericity: An introduction. In Carlson, G. & Pelletier, J. (eds.), The generic book, pp. 1–124. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T. (2006). The acquisition of determiners in bilingual German–Italian and German–French children. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T. & Koops, C. (2006). The definite article in non-specific noun phrases: Comparing French and Italian. In Stark, E., Leiss, E. & Abraham, W. (eds.), Nominal determination typology: Context constraints and historical emergence, pp. 187–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lazarova-Nikovska, A. (2005). Age and transfer effects in the initial stages of second language acquisition of English. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lee, D. & Schachter, J. (1998). Sensitive period effects in binding theory. Language Acquisition, 6, 333–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonetti, M. (2004). Specificity and differential object marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 3, 75–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, Y.-K. (2001). The initial state of L3A: Full transfer and failed features? In Bonch-Bruevich, X., Crawford, W. J., Hellermann, J., Higgins, C. & Nguyen, H. (eds.), The past, present and future of second language research: Selected proceedings of the 2000 Second Language Research Forum, pp. 55–75. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, C. (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maclaran, R. (1982). The semantics and pragmatics of the English demonstratives. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. (1976). The use of definite and indefinite reference in young children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthewson, L., Bryant, T. & Roeper, T. (2001). A Salish stage in the acquisition of English determiners: Unfamiliar “definites”. Proceedings of SULA: The semantics of under-represented languages in the Americas (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 25), pp. 63–71. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., Foote, R. & Perpiñán, S. (2008). Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning 58, 503–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosel, U. & Hovdhaugen, E. (1992). Samoan reference grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, S. (1997). Knowledge and production of English articles by advanced second language learners. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Parrish, B. (1987). A new look at methodologies in the study of article acquisition for learners of ESL. Language Learning, 37, 361–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereltsvaig, A. (2007). The universality of DP: A view from Russian. Studia Linguistica, 61, 59–94.Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A., Munn, A., Schmitt, C. & DeIrish, M. (2004). Learning definite determiners: Genericity and definiteness in English and Spanish. BUCLD 28 Proceedings Supplement. http://www.bu.edu/linguistics/APPLIED/BUCLD/supp.html (retrieved 21 May 2008), 12 pp.Google Scholar
Prince, E. (1981). On the inferencing of indefinite-this NPs. In Joshi, A. K., Webber, B. L. & Sag, I. A. (eds.), Elements of discourse understanding, pp. 231–250. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. (2000). Variability in the use of the English article system by Chinese learners of English. Second Language Research, 16, 135–172.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, J. & Matthewson, L. (2005). Grammar and pragmatics in the acquisition of article systems. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 23, 53–101.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. (1992). Testing between UG-based and problem-solving models of L2A: Developmental sequence data. Language Acquisition, 2, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. (2003). Child L2 acquisition: Paving the way. In Beachley, B., Brown, A. & Conlin, F. (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 26–50. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. (2004). Why child L2-acquisition? In Kampen, J. van & Bauuw, S. (eds.), Proceedings of GALA 2003, pp. 47–66. Utrecht: LOT, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Serratrice, L. (2000). The emergence of functional categories in bilingual language acquisition. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1981). Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics, 2, 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singleton, D. & Lengyel, Z. (eds.) (1995). The age factor in second language acquisition: A critical look at the critical period hypothesis. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2006). Learnability in the second language acquisition of a semantic parameter. Second Language Research, 22, 498–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, H.-S. & Schwartz, B. D. (2009). Testing the Fundamental Difference Hypothesis: L2 adult, L2 child, and L1 child comparisons in the acquisition of Korean wh-constructions with negative polarity items. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 323–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (2000). Syntactic optionality in non-native grammars. Second Language Research, 16, 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. (1989). The acquisition of English articles by first- and second-language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrego, E. (1998). The dependency of objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenkic, D. (2000). The acquisition of English articles by Serbian speakers. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Trenkic, D. (2004). Definiteness in Serbian/Croatian/Bosnian and some implications for the general structure of the nominal phrase. Lingua, 114, 1401–1427.Google Scholar
Trenkic, D. (2007). Variability in L2 article production: Beyond the representational deficits vs. processing constraints debate. Second Language Research, 23, 289–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenkic, D. (2008). The representation of English articles in second language grammars: Determiners or adjectives? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tryzna, M. (2009). Questioning the validity of the Article Choice Parameter and the Fluctuation Hypothesis: Evidence from L2 English article use by L1 Polish and L1 Mandarin Chinese speakers. In Mayo, M. d. P. García & Hawkins, R. (eds.), Second language acquisition of articles: Empirical findings and theoretical implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [In press in July 2009.]Google Scholar
Unsworth, S. (2005). Child L2, Adult L2, child L1: Differences and similarities. A study on the acquisition of direct object scrambling in Dutch. Ph.D. thesis, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Warden, D. (1976). The influence of contexts on children's use of identifying expressions and references. British Journal of Psychology, 67, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K. (2003). Maximal trouble. Presented at the CUNY Human Sentence Processing Conference, MIT.Google Scholar
Yang, M. & Ionin, T. (2009). Specificity and speaker knowledge in the second language acquisition of English articles. Ms., Guangdong University of Foreign Studies & University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.Google Scholar
Young, R. (1996). Form–function relations in articles in English interlanguage. In Bayley, R. & Preston, D. R.. (eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation, pp. 135–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zdorenko, T. & Paradis, J. (2008). The acquisition of articles in child second language English: Fluctuation, transfer or both? Second Language Research, 24, 227–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zlatić, L. (1997). The structure of the Serbian noun phrase. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar