Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:50:51.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Updating and reasoning: Different processes, different models, different functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2019

Laura Kelly ,
Janani Prabhakar  and
Sangeet Khemlani Open the ORCID record for Sangeet Khemlani [Opens in a new window]
Laura Kelly
Affiliation:
Navy Center of Applied Research in Artificial Intelligence, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC20375. [email protected]@nrl.navy.milwww.laurajanekelly.comwww.khemlani.net
Janani Prabhakar
Affiliation:
Center for Mind and Brain, University of California Davis, Davis, CA95616. [email protected]
Sangeet Khemlani
Affiliation:
Navy Center of Applied Research in Artificial Intelligence, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC20375. [email protected]@nrl.navy.milwww.laurajanekelly.comwww.khemlani.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two issues should be addressed to refine and extend the distinction between temporal updating and reasoning advocated by Hoerl & McCormack. First, do the mental representations constructed during updating differ from those used for reasoning? Second, are updating and reasoning the only two processes relevant to temporal thinking? If not, is a dual-systems framework sensible? We address both issues below.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019 , e258
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chua, H., Boland, J. & Nisbett, R. (2005) Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102:12629–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Churchland, P., Ramachandran, V. & Sejnowski, T. (1994) A critique of pure vision. In: Large-scale neuronal theories of the brain, ed. Koch, C. & Davis, J. L., pp. 23–60. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, L. (2018) Giving responses dimension: Representational shifts in color space and event segmentation decisions in physical space over time. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California Merced.Google Scholar
Khemlani, S., Harrison, A. & Trafton, J. (2015) Episodes, events, and models. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9:590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khemlani, S., Mackiewicz, R., Bucciarelli, M. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2013) Kinematic mental simulations in abduction and deduction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110:16766–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prabhakar, J. & Ghetti, S. (2019) Connecting the dots between the past and future: Constraints in episodic future thinking in early childhood. Child Development. doi:10.1111/cdev.13212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanovich, K. & West, R. (2000) Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23:645–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y. & Gennari, S. (2019) How language and event recall can shape memory for time. Cognitive Psychology 108:1–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, L. & Khemlani, S. (2019) The consistency of durative relations. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. Goel, A., Seifert, C., & Freksa, C.. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar