Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:44:00.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unconscious influences of, not just on, decision making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2014

Géraldine Coppin*
Affiliation:
The John B. Pierce Laboratory, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06519; Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511. [email protected]://jbpierce.org/neuropsychology-and-physiology-of-flavor-and-feeding/

Abstract

This commentary focuses on the bidirectional links between unconscious influences and decision making. In particular, it examines the extent to which awareness is (not) necessary to the impact of decisions on psychological processes such as preferences. This analysis might help researchers to gain an extended perspective of Newell & Shanks' (N&S's) concerns regarding the role of unconscious influences in theories of decision making.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, V. L. (1965) Effect of extraneous cognitive activity on dissonance reduction. Psychological Reports 16:1145–51. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1965.16.3v.1145.Google Scholar
Brehm, J. W. (1956) Post-decision changes in desirability of choice alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 52:384–89. doi: 10.1037/h0041006.Google Scholar
Chen, K. M. & Risen, J. L. (2010) How choice affects and reflects preferences: Revisiting the free-choice paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99:573–94. doi: 10.1037/a0020217.Google Scholar
Coppin, G., Delplanque, S., Cayeux, I., Porcherot, C. & Sander, D. (2010) I'm no longer torn after choice: How explicit choices can implicitly shape preferences for odors. Psychological Science 21:489–93. doi: 10.1177/0956797610364115.Google Scholar
Egan, L. C., Bloom, P. & Santos, L. R. (2010) Choice-induced preferences in the absence of choice: Evidence from a blind two-choice paradigm with young children and capuchin monkeys. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46: 204207. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.014.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Row Peterson and Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. & Walster, E. (1964) Postdecision regret and decision reversal. In: Conflict, decision, and dissonance, ed. Festinger, L., pp. 100–12. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E. & Mills, J., eds. (1999) Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Lieberman, M. D., Ochsner, K. N., Gilbert, D. T. & Schacter, D. L. (2001) Do amnesiacs exhibit cognitive dissonance reduction? The role of explicit memory and attention in attitude change. Psychological Science 2:135–40. doi: 10.1111/1467–9280.00323.Google Scholar
Lyubomirsky, S. & Ross, L. (1999) Changes in attractiveness of elected, rejected, and precluded alternatives: A comparison of happy and unhappy individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76:9881007. doi: 10.1037/0022 3514.76.6.988.Google Scholar
McGregor, I., Newby-Clark, I. R. & Zanna, M. P. (1999) “Remembering” dissonance: Simultaneous accessibility of inconsistent cognitive elements moderates epistemic discomfort. In: Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology, ed. Harmon-Jones, E. & Mills, J., pp. 2542. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Sharot, T., Velasquez, C. M. & Dolan, R. J. (2010) Do decisions shape preference? Evidence from blind choice. Psychological Science 2:1231–35. doi: 10.1177/0956797610379235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicklund, R. A. & Brehm, J. W. (1976) Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Erlbaum.Google Scholar