Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:36:42.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards a multifaceted understanding of revenge and forgiveness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

Ramzi Fatfouta
Affiliation:
Dahlem Institute for Neuroimaging of Emotion (D.I.N.E.), Cluster of Excellence “Languages of Emotion”, Freie Universität, Berlin, D-14195 Berlin, Germany. [email protected]://www.languages-of-emotion.de/en/[email protected]://www.languages-of-emotion.de/en/dine/
Arthur Jacobs
Affiliation:
Dahlem Institute for Neuroimaging of Emotion (D.I.N.E.), Cluster of Excellence “Languages of Emotion”, Freie Universität, Berlin, D-14195 Berlin, Germany. [email protected]://www.languages-of-emotion.de/en/[email protected]://www.languages-of-emotion.de/en/dine/ Department of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Freie Universität, Berlin, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
Angela Merkl
Affiliation:
Dahlem Institute for Neuroimaging of Emotion (D.I.N.E.), Cluster of Excellence “Languages of Emotion”, Freie Universität, Berlin, D-14195 Berlin, Germany. [email protected]://www.languages-of-emotion.de/en/[email protected]://www.languages-of-emotion.de/en/dine/ Department of Psychiatry, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, D-14050 Berlin, Germany. [email protected]://psychiatrie.charite.de/en/

Abstract

We focus on two aspects: First, we argue that it is necessary to include implicit forgiveness as an additional adaptive behavioral option to the perception of interpersonal transgressions. Second, we present one possible way to investigate the cognitive-affective underpinnings of revenge and forgiveness: a functional MRI (fMRI) approach aiming at integrating forgiveness and revenge mechanisms into a single paradigm.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asendorpf, J. B., Banse, R. & Mücke, D. (2002) Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83(2):380–93.Google Scholar
Buchanan, T. W. (2007) Retrieval of emotional memories. Psychological Bulletin 133(5):761–79. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.761Google Scholar
Eid, M. & Diener, E. (2006) Introduction: The need for multimethod measurement in psychology. In: Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology, ed. Eid, M. & Diener, E., pp. 38. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Exline, J. J. & Baumeister, R. F. (2000) Expressing forgiveness and repentance: Benefits and barriers. In: Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice, ed. McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I. & Thoresen, C. E., pp. 133–55. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Farrow, T. F., Hunter, M. D., Wilkinson, I. D., Gouneea, C., Fawbert, D., Smith, R., Lee, K. H., Mason, S., Spence, S. A. & Woodruff, P. W. (2005) Quantifiable change in functional brain response to empathic and forgivability judgments with resolution of posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychiatry Research 140(1):4553.Google Scholar
Farrow, T. F., Zheng, Y., Wilkinson, I. D., Spence, S. A., Deakin, J. F., Tarrier, N., Griffiths, P. D. & Woodruff, P. W. (2001) Investigating the functional anatomy of empathy and forgiveness. NeuroReport 12(11):2433–38.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G. & Banaji, M. R. (1995) Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review 102(1):427.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A. & Mellott, D. S. (2002) A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review 109(1):325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E. & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(6):1464–480.Google Scholar
Hayashi, A., Abe, N., Ueno, A., Shigemune, Y., Mori, E., Tashiro, M. & Fujii, T. (2010) Neural correlates of forgiveness for moral transgressions involving deception. Brain Research 1332:9099. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.03.045Google Scholar
Maguire, E. A. (2001) Neuroimaging studies of autobiographical event memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 356(1413):1441–51.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E. & Wilson, T. D. (1977) Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 84(3):231–59.Google Scholar
Pronk, T. M., Karremans, J. C., Overbeek, G., Vermuist, A. A. & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2010) What it takes to forgive: When and why executive functioning facilitates forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98(1):119–31.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. C. (2005) A basic-systems approach to autobiographical memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science 14(2):7983.Google Scholar
Sanfey, A. G. (2007) Social decision-making: Insights from game theory and neuroscience. Science 318(5850):598602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svoboda, E., McKinnon, M. C. & Levine, B. (2006) The functional neuroanatomy of autobiographical memory: A meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia 44(12):2189–208.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., Sell, A., Lieberman, D. & Sznycer, D. (2008) Internal regulatory variables and the design of human motivation: A computational and evolutionary approach. In: Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation, ed. Elliott, A., pp. 251–72. Erlbaum/Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, U., N'Diaye, K., Ethofer, T. & Vuilleumier, P. (2011) Guilt-specific processing in the prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 21(11):2461–70.Google Scholar
Wilkowski, B. M., Robinson, M. D. & Troop-Gordon, W. (2010) How does cognitive control reduce anger and aggression? The role of conflict monitoring and forgiveness processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98(5):830–40. doi: 10.1037/a0018962Google Scholar
Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S. & Schooler, T. Y. (2000) A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review 107(1):101126.Google Scholar