No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Revisiting the spaces of societies and the cooperation that sustains them
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 April 2025
Abstract
We embrace Moffett's call for more rigorous definitions of social organizations but raise two intersecting critiques: (1) The spaces controlled by societies are not exclusively physical, and (2) cooperation is required to maintain control over spaces, physical or otherwise. We discuss examples of non-physical societal spaces across species and highlight the top-down group cooperation challenge that is maintaining them.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Brooks, J., & Yamamoto, S. (2022). The evolution of group-mindedness: Comparative research on top-down and bottom-up group cooperation in bonobos and chimpanzees. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 47, 101205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooksey, K., Sanz, C., Ebombi, T. F., Massamba, J. M., Teberd, P., Magema, E., … Morgan, D. (2020). Socioecological factors influencing intergroup encounters in western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). International Journal of Primatology, 41(2), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-020-00147-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcina, G., Vallet, D., Le Gouar, P. J., Bernardo-Madrid, R., Illera, G., Molina-Vacas, G., … Vilà, C. (2019). From groups to communities in western lowland gorillas. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 286(1896), 20182019. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.2019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furuichi, T. (2011). Female contributions to the peaceful nature of bonobo society. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 20(4), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.20308Google Scholar
Samuni, L., Langergraber, K. E., & Surbeck, M. H. (2022). Characterization of Pan social systems reveals in-group/out-group distinction and out-group tolerance in bonobos. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(26), e2201122119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2201122119Google ScholarPubMed
Samuni, L., & Surbeck, M. (2023). Cooperation across social borders in bonobos. Science, 382(6672), 805–809. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg0844Google ScholarPubMed
Target article
What is a society? Building an interdisciplinary perspective and why that's important
Related commentaries (24)
A nation by any other name: A failure to focus on function
Belonging to a community of moral values as a key criterion of society
Beyond biology: A sociological stance on what is society
Collective memories and understandings of human societies
Definitions and cultural dynamics in understanding “societies”
Do boundaries matter so much for societies?
Group identity without social interactions?
How an interdisciplinary study of societies can develop a comprehensive understanding of the function of deceptive behavior
Identity groups, perceived group continuity, and schism
Identity is probably too complicated to serve as a useful criterion for defining society
Multi-species societies
Philosophy or science of societies?
Psychological mechanisms for individual recognition- and anonymous-societies in humans and other animals
Revisiting the spaces of societies and the cooperation that sustains them
Societal inferences from the physical world
Societies have functions for individuals and collectives
Societies of the open ocean without territories
Societies, identities, and macrodemes
Society: An anthropological perspective
The family as the primary social group
Understanding the jaggedness in social complexity is more important
Vocalizations are ideal identity signals
What is a society in the case of multilevel societies?
Why societies are important and grow so large: Tribes, nations, and teams
Author response
A society as a clearly membered, enduring, territory-holding group