Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T21:26:29.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Representation of affect in sensory cortex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2017

Vladimir Miskovic ,
Karl Kuntzelman ,
Junichi Chikazoe  and
Adam K. Anderson
Vladimir Miskovic
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY [email protected]@binghamton.edu
Karl Kuntzelman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY [email protected]@binghamton.edu
Junichi Chikazoe
Affiliation:
Department of Human Development, Human Neuroscience Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY [email protected] Section of Brain Function Information, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, Aichi, 444-8585, [email protected]
Adam K. Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of Human Development, Human Neuroscience Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Contemporary neuroscience suggests that perception is perhaps best understood as a dynamically iterative process that does not honor cleanly segregated “bottom-up” or “top-down” streams. We argue that there is substantial empirical support for the idea that affective influences infiltrate the earliest reaches of sensory processing and even that primitive internal affective dimensions (e.g., goodness-to-badness) are represented alongside physical dimensions of the external world.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e252
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bieszczad, K. M. & Weinberger, N. M. (2010) Representational gain in cortical area underlies increase of memory strength. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107:3793–98.Google Scholar
Briggs, F. & Usrey, W. M. (2005) Temporal properties of feedforward and feedback pathways between the thalamus and visual cortex in the ferret. Thalamus and Related Systems 3:133–39.Google Scholar
Carandini, M., Demb, J. B., Mante, V., Tolhurst, D. J., Dan, Y., Olshausen, B. A., Gallant, J.L. & Rust, N.C. (2005) Do we understand what the early visual system does? The Journal of Neuroscience 25:10577–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chikazoe, J., Lee, D. H., Kriegeskorte, N. & Anderson, A. K. (2014) Population coding of affect across stimuli, modalities and individuals. Nature Neuroscience 17:1114–22.Google Scholar
Douglas, R. J. & Martin, K. A. C. (2007) Mapping the matrix: The ways of neocortex. Neuron 56:226–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fontanini, A. & Katz, D. B. (2008) Behavioral states, network states, and sensory response variability. Journal of Neurophysiology 100:1160–68.Google Scholar
Franconeri, S. L., Alvarez, G. A. & Cavanagh, P. (2013) Flexible cognitive resources: Competitive content maps for attention and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17:134–41.Google Scholar
Kriegeskorte, N. & Kievit, R. A. (2013) Representational geometry: Integrating cognition, computation, and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17:401–12.Google Scholar
Markov, N. T. & Kennedy, H. (2013) The importance of being hierarchical. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 23:187–94.Google Scholar
McGann, J. P. (2015) Associative l earning and sensory neuroplasticity: How does it happen and what is it good for? Learning & Memory 22:567–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miskovic, V. & Keil, A. (2012) Acquired fears reflected in cortical sensory processing: A review of electrophysiological studies of human classical conditioning. Psychophysiology 49:1230–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muckli, L. (2010) What are we missing here? Brain imaging evidence for higher cognitive functions in primary visual cortex V1. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology 20:131–39.Google Scholar
Muckli, L. & Petro, L. S. (2013) Network interactions: Non-geniculate input to V1. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 23:195–201.Google Scholar
Olshausen, B. A. & Field, D. J. (2005) How close are to understanding V1? Neural Computation 17:1665–99.Google Scholar
Rutkowski, R. G. & Weinberger, N. M. (2005) Encoding of learned importance of sound by magnitude of representational area in primary auditory cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102:13664–69.Google Scholar
Weinberger, N. M. (2004) Specific long-term memory traces in primary auditory cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5:279–90.Google Scholar
Wündt, W. (1897) Grundriss der Psychologie, von Wilhelm Wundt. W. Engelmann.Google Scholar