No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Real systemic solutions to humanity's problems require a radical reshaping of the global political system
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 August 2023
Abstract
Society's problems cannot be alleviated via mere policy interventions, whether individual- or system-level, when the system is the problem. To bring about true and lasting change to the better, we must replace the present global political-economic system – oligarchic capitalism backed by the power of the state – with one that would let the people take charge of their lives.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Anderson, J. K., & Springer, N. J. (2018). Zapatismo as a resonant public pedagogy. Latin American Perspectives, 45(3), 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong McKay, D. I., Staal, A., Abrams, J. F., Winkelmann, R., Sakschewski, B., Loriani, S., … Lenton, T. M. (2022). Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points. Science (New York, N.Y.), 377, eabn7950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brighouse, H. (2021). If you're a socialist you need the Real Utopias Project, whether you like it or not. Paper presented at the conference “Engaging Erik Wright: Between class analysis and real Utopias,” October 9, 2021.Google Scholar
Dirik, D. (2022). Stateless citizenship: “Radical democracy as consciousness-raising” in the Rojava revolution. Identities, 29(1), 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
du Bois, W. D. (1983). Love, synergy, and the magical – The foundations of humanistic sociology. PhD thesis, William Penn College, Oskaloosa, Iowa.Google Scholar
Edelman, S. (2023). The consciousness revolutions: From amoeba awareness to human emancipation. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, M., & Page, B. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12, 564–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graeber, D. (2004). Fragments of an anarchist anthropology. Prickly Paradigm Press. Available online at https://www.prickly-paradigm.com/titles/fragments-anarchist-anthropology.htmlGoogle Scholar
Graeber, D. (2006). Turning modes of production inside out or, why capitalism is a transformation of slavery. Critique of Anthropology, 26(1), 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graeber, D., & Wengrow, D. (2021). The dawn of everything: A new history of humanity. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Harman, C. (2010). Zombie capitalism: Global crisis and the relevance of Marx. Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
Herman, E., & Chomsky, N. (2002). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Pantheon.Google Scholar
Hirschfield, P. J., & Simon, D. (2010). Legitimating police violence: Newspaper narratives of deadly force. Theoretical Criminology, 14(2), 155–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, J., & Rich, M. D. (2018). Truth decay: An initial exploration of the diminishing role of facts and analysis in American public life. Rand.Google Scholar
MacLeod, A., & Chomsky, N. (2019). Still manufacturing consent: An interview with Noam Chomsky. In MacLeod, A. (Ed.), Propaganda in the information age (pp. 12–22). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maldonado-Villalpando, E., Paneque-Gálvez, J., Demaria, F., & Napoletano, B. M. (2022). Grassroots innovation for the pluriverse: Evidence from Zapatismo and autonomous Zapatista education. Sustainability Science, 17, 1301–1316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martín-Baró, I. (1996). Writings for a liberation psychology (A. Aron and S. Corne, Trans.). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mulgan, T. (2019). Corporate agency and possible futures. Journal of Business Ethics, 154, 901–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piccardi, E. G., & Barca, S. (2022). Jin-jiyan-azadi. Matristic culture and Democratic Confederalism in Rojava. Sustainability Science, 17, 1273–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suissa, J. (2019). Anarchist education. In Levy, C. & Adams, M. S. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of anarchism (Ch. 29), (pp. 511–529). Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, D., & Hickel, J. (2023). Capitalism and extreme poverty: A global analysis of real wages, human height, and mortality since the long 16th century. World Development, 161, 106026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
The i-frame and the s-frame: How focusing on individual-level solutions has led behavioral public policy astray
Related commentaries (33)
An inconvenient truth: Difficult problems rarely have easy solutions
Behavioral market design
Behavioral mechanism design
Behavioral public policy in practice: Misconceptions and opportunities
Behavioral winter: Disillusionment with applied behavioral science and a path to spring forward
Community-engaged research is best positioned to catalyze systemic change
Conspiracy theory
Don't throw the individual perspective out while waiting for systemic change
Expectations, opportunities, and awareness: A case for combining i- and s-frame interventions
i-Frame interventions enhance s-frame interventions
Individual-level solutions may support system-level change â if they are internalized as part of one's social identity
It's always both: Changing individuals requires changing systems and changing systems requires changing individuals
Misdiagnosing the problem of why behavioural change interventions fail
Moral psychology biases toward individual, not systemic, representations
Moving from i-frame to s-frame focus in equity, diversity, and inclusion research, practice, and policy
Nudges, regulations, and behavioral public choice
Nudging is being framed
On Skinner's pendulum: A framework for assessing s-frame hope
Optimizing behavior change through integration of individual- and system-level intervention approaches
Real systemic solutions to humanity's problems require a radical reshaping of the global political system
Structural problems require structural solutions
The influence of private interests on research in behavioural public policy: A system-level problem
The psychology and policy of overcoming economic inequality
The real cause of our complicity: The preoccupation with human weakness
The social sciences are increasingly ill-equipped to design system-level reforms
The “hearts-and-minds frame”: Not all i-frame interventions are ineffective, but education-based interventions can be particularly bad
Unpacking the nudge muddle
Use behavioral research to improve the feasibility and effectiveness of system-level policy
Using effective psychological techniques to subvert a US sociopolitical context
When nudges have societal-level impact
Why a group-level analysis is essential for effective public policy: The case for a g-frame
Wise interventions consider the person and the situation together
“More effective” is not necessarily “better”: Some ethical considerations when influencing individual behaviour
Author response
Where next for behavioral public policy?