Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Zefferman, Matthew R.
2014.
Direct reciprocity under uncertainty does not explain one-shot cooperation, but demonstrates the benefits of a norm psychology.
Evolution and Human Behavior,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 5,
p.
358.
J. Smith, Heather
Goode, Chris
Balzarini, Rhonda
Ryan, Desiree
and
Georges, Marissa
2014.
The cost of forgiveness: Observers prefer victims who leave unfaithful romantic partners.
European Journal of Social Psychology,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 7,
p.
758.
VAN MONSJOU, ELIZABETH
STRUTHERS, C. WARD
KHOURY, CAREEN
GUILFOYLE, JOSHUA R.
YOUNG, REBECCA
HODARA, OSHRAT
and
MULLER, ROBERT T.
2015.
The effects of adult attachment style on post‐transgression response.
Personal Relationships,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 4,
p.
762.
Goode, Chris
and
Smith, Heather J
2016.
Retribution or restoration: symbolic justice concerns shape how victim group members react to intergroup transgressions.
Current Opinion in Psychology,
Vol. 11,
Issue. ,
p.
105.
Smith, Heather J.
Jaurique, Alexandria
and
Ryan, Desiree
2016.
The Mistreatment of Others: Discrimination Can Undermine University Identification, Student Health, and Engagement.
Social Justice Research,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 4,
p.
355.
Malle, Bertram F.
2016.
Integrating robot ethics and machine morality: the study and design of moral competence in robots.
Ethics and Information Technology,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
243.
Walczack, Martin
2016.
Psychologie der Werte.
p.
247.
Donovan, Leigh Anne Novak
and
Priester, Joseph R.
2017.
Exploring the psychological processes underlying interpersonal forgiveness: The superiority of motivated reasoning over empathy.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
Vol. 71,
Issue. ,
p.
16.
Chester, David S
Lynam, Donald R
Milich, Richard
and
DeWall, C Nathan
2018.
Neural mechanisms of the rejection–aggression link.
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 5,
p.
501.
Cataldo, Quésia F.
and
de Almeida Segundo, Damião S.
2018.
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.
p.
1.
Hill, Krista M.
and
Blanch-Hartigan, Danielle
2018.
Physician gender and apologies in clinical interactions.
Patient Education and Counseling,
Vol. 101,
Issue. 5,
p.
836.
Cullen, Simon
2018.
When do circumstances excuse? Moral prejudices and beliefs about the true self drive preferences for agency-minimizing explanations.
Cognition,
Vol. 180,
Issue. ,
p.
165.
Hofmann, Wilhelm
Brandt, Mark J.
Wisneski, Daniel C.
Rockenbach, Bettina
and
Skitka, Linda J.
2018.
Moral Punishment in Everyday Life.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 12,
p.
1697.
Chernyak, Nadia
Leimgruber, Kristin L.
Dunham, Yarrow C.
Hu, Jingshi
and
Blake, Peter R.
2019.
Paying Back People Who Harmed Us but Not People Who Helped Us: Direct Negative Reciprocity Precedes Direct Positive Reciprocity in Early Development.
Psychological Science,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 9,
p.
1273.
Goldner, Limor
Lev-Wiesel, Rachel
and
Simon, Guy
2019.
Revenge Fantasies After Experiencing Traumatic Events: Sex Differences.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Vol. 10,
Issue. ,
Radu, Alexandru Gabriel
Arli, Denni
Surachartkumtonkun, Jiraporn
Weaven, Scott
and
Wright, Owen
2019.
Empathy and apology: the effectiveness of recovery strategies.
Marketing Intelligence & Planning,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 4,
p.
358.
Grégoire, Yany
Legoux, Renaud
Tripp, Thomas M.
Radanielina-Hita, Marie-Louise
Joireman, Jeffrey
and
Rotman, Jeffrey D.
2019.
What Do Online Complainers Want? An Examination of the Justice Motivations and the Moral Implications of Vigilante and Reparation Schemas.
Journal of Business Ethics,
Vol. 160,
Issue. 1,
p.
167.
Pronk, Tila M.
Buyukcan-Tetik, Asuman
Iliás, Marina M.A.H.
and
Finkenauer, Catrin
2019.
Marriage as a training ground: Examining change in self-control and forgiveness over the first 4 years of marriage.
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 1,
p.
109.
Zwarg, Clarissa
2019.
Psychologie des Guten und Bösen.
p.
67.
Nkomo, Thobeka S.
2019.
Exploring Congolese refugees and asylum seekers’ survival strategies in South Africa: Implication for social work practice.
Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 4,
p.
499.
Target article
Cognitive systems for revenge and forgiveness
Related commentaries (27)
A systems view on revenge and forgiveness systems
Adaptationism and intuitions about modern criminal justice
Affective antecedents of revenge
An eye for an eye: Reciprocity and the calibration of redress
An implausible model and evolutionary explanation of the revenge motive
Applying the revenge system to the criminal justice system and jury decision-making
Forgiveness is institutionally mediated, not an isolable modular output
It takes more to forgive: The role of executive control
No such thing as genuine forgiveness?
On the differential mediating role of emotions in revenge and reconciliation
On the evolutionary origins of revenge and forgiveness: A converging systems hypothesis
Pathways to abnormal revenge and forgiveness
Personality, self-control, and welfare-tradeoff ratios in revenge and forgiveness
Revenge and forgiveness in the New South Africa
Revenge and forgiveness or betrayal blindness?
Revenge can be more fully understood by making distinctions between anger and hatred
Revenge without redundancy: Functional outcomes do not require discrete adaptations for vengeance or forgiveness
Revenge, even though it is not your fault
Revenge: An adaptive system for maximizing fitness, or a proximate calculation arising from personality and social-psychological processes?
Revenge: Behavioral and emotional consequences
The cultural shaping of revenge
The elementary dynamics of intergroup conflict and revenge
The fuzzy reality of perceived harms
The logic of moral outrage
Third parties belief in a just world and secondary victimization
Towards a multifaceted understanding of revenge and forgiveness
Why so complex? Emotional mediation of revenge, forgiveness, and reconciliation
Author response
Putting revenge and forgiveness in an evolutionary context