Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:34:27.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The primacy of scaffolding within groups for the evolution of group-level traits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2014

Linnda R. Caporael  and
Colin K. Garvey
Linnda R. Caporael
Affiliation:
Department of Science and Technology Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180. [email protected]@rpi.eduhttp://www.rpi.edu/~caporl
Colin K. Garvey
Affiliation:
Department of Science and Technology Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180. [email protected]@rpi.eduhttp://www.rpi.edu/~caporl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although both a “simple dyad or a population of thousands” are groups, these are, respectively, face-to-face embodied groups and collective symbolic groups. We applaud Smaldino for recognizing and describing the concept of the group-level trait. As an expansion, we propose an evolutionary-developmental model of face-to-face groups that scaffolds theorizing the evolution of cultural group-level traits.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , June 2014 , pp. 255 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brewer, M. B. & Caporael, L. R. (2006) Social identity motives in evolutionary perspective. In: Social identities: motivational, emotional, cultural influences, ed. Brown, R. & Capozza, D., pp. 135–52. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Caporael, L. R. (1997) The evolution of truly social cognition: The core configurations model. Personality and Social Psychology Review 1:276–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caporael, L. R. (2014) Evolution, groups, and scaffolded minds. In: Developing scaffolds in evolution, culture, and cognition, ed. Caporael, L. R., Griesemer, J. R., & Wimsatt, W. C., pp. 57–76. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Caporael, L. R., Dawes, R. M., Orbell, J. M. & Van de Kragt, A. J. C. (1989) Selfishness examined: Cooperation in the absence of egoistic incentives. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:683–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caporael, L. R., Griesiemer, J. R. & Wimsatt, W. C. (2014) Developing scaffolds in evolution, culture, and cognition. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993) Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16(4):681–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. (1988) Science as a process. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layton, R. & O'Hara, S. (2010) A comparison of hunter-gatherer and chimpanzee social organization. In: Social brain, distributed mind, ed. Dunbar, R., Gamble, C., & Gowlett, J., pp. 85–115. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar