No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The missing chapter: The interaction between behavioral and symbolic inheritance
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 December 2007
Abstract
A strength of Jablonka & Lamb's (J&L's) book lies in its accessible as well as thorough treatment of genetic and epigenetic inheritance. The authors also provide a stimulating framework integrating evolutionary research across disciplines. A weakness is its unsystematic treatment of the interaction between behavioral and symbolic inheritance, particularly in their discussion of language.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007
References
Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L. & Volterra, V. (1979) The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2006) From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition. Language 82:711–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Boysson-Bardies, B. & Vihman, M. M. (1991) Adaptation to language: Evidence from babbling and first words in four languages. Language 67:297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCasper, A. J. & Fifer, W. P. (1980) Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers' voices. Science 208:1174–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeCasper, A. J. & Prescott, P. A. (1984) Human newborns' perception of male voices: Preference, discrimination, and reinforcing value. Developmental Psychobiology 17:481–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, M. H., King, A. P. & West, M. J. (2003) Social interaction shapes babbling: Testing parallels between birdsong and speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100:8030–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, M. H. & West, M. J. (1999) Consistent responses of human mothers to prelinguistic infants: The effect of prelinguistic repertoire size. Journal of Comparative Psychology 113:52–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jablonka, E. & Lamb, M. J. (2005) Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kisilevsky, B. S., Hains, S. M. J., Lee, K., Xie, X., Huang, H., Zhang, K. & Wang, Z. (2003) Effects of experience on fetal voice recognition. Psychological Science 14:220–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meltzoff, A. N. (1988) Imitation, objects, tools, and the rudiments of language in human ontogeny. Human Evolution 3:45–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meltzoff, A. N. & Moore, M. K. (1977) Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science 198:75–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, R., Werker, J. F. & Morgan, J. L. (1999) Newborn infants' sensitivity to perceptual cues to lexical and grammatical words. Cognition 72:11–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Barton, M. (1994) Learning words in nonostensive contexts. Developmental Psychology 30:639–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. S. (1966) The development and generalization of contingency awareness in early infancy: Some hypotheses. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 12:123–35.Google Scholar
Watson, J. S. (1985) Contingency perception in early social development. In: Social perception in infants, ed. Field, T. M. & Fox, N. A., pp. 157–76. Ablex.Google Scholar