Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-54txb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-05T00:26:58.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individual differences in political ideology are effects of adaptive error management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2014

Michael Bang Petersen  and
Lene Aarøe
Michael Bang Petersen
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science and Government, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. [email protected]://pure.au.dk/portal/en/persons/michael-bang-petersen(7998cc16-75d5-4065-8b6e-395d73e22151)[email protected]://pure.au.dk/portal/en/persons/id(d3f852cb-fd5d-46d7-b58d-0a6813a0db3c).html
Lene Aarøe
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science and Government, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. [email protected]://pure.au.dk/portal/en/persons/michael-bang-petersen(7998cc16-75d5-4065-8b6e-395d73e22151)[email protected]://pure.au.dk/portal/en/persons/id(d3f852cb-fd5d-46d7-b58d-0a6813a0db3c).html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We apply error management theory to the analysis of individual differences in the negativity bias and political ideology. Using principles from evolutionary psychology, we propose a coherent theoretical framework for understanding (1) why individuals differ in their political ideology and (2) the conditions under which these individual differences influence and fail to influence the political choices people make.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , June 2014 , pp. 324 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buss, D. M. (2009) How can evolutionary psychology successfully explain personality and individual differences? Perspectives on Psychological Science 4(4):359–66.Google Scholar
Fincher, C. L., Thornhill, R., Murray, D. R. & Schaller, M. (2008) Pathogen prevalence predicts human cross-cultural variability in individualism/collectivism. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275(1640):1279–85.Google Scholar
Haselton, M. G. & Nettle, D. (2006) The paranoid optimist: An integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review 10(1):47–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henningham, J. P. (1996) A 12-item scale of social conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences 20(4):517–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. D. P., Blumstein, D. T., Fowler, J. H. & Haselton, M. G. (2013) The evolution of error: Error management, cognitive constraints, and adaptive decision-making biases. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28(8):474–81.Google Scholar
Lukaszewski, A. W. & Roney, J. R. (2011) The origins of extraversion: Joint effects of facultative calibration and genetic polymorphism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37(3):409–21.Google Scholar
McDermott, R., Fowler, J. H. & Smirnov, O. (2008) On the evolutionary origin of prospect theory preferences. Journal of Politics 70(2):335–50.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. B. (2013) Moralization as protection against exploitation: Do individuals without allies moralize more? Evolution and Human Behavior 34(2):78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, M. B. & Aarøe, L. (2013) Politics in the mind's eye: Imagination as a link between social and political cognition. American Political Science Review 107(2):275–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, M. B., Slothuus, R., Stubager, R. & Togeby, L. (2011) Deservingness versus values in public opinion on welfare: The automaticity of the deservingness heuristic, European Journal of Political Research 50(1):24–52.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. B., Sznycer, D., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (2012) Who deserves help? Evolutionary psychology, social emotions, and public opinion on welfare. Political Psychology 33(3):395–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sell, A., Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (2009) Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(35):15073–78.Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E., Vieider, F. M., Patil, S. V. & Grant, A. M. (2013) Accountability and ideology: When left looks right and right looks left. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 122(1):22–35.Google Scholar
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (1990) The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and sociobiology 11(4):375–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (1996) Friendship and the banker's paradox: Other pathways to the evolution of adaptations for altruism. In: Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 88, pp. 119–43. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar