No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Identity groups, perceived group continuity, and schism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 April 2025
Abstract
Moffett's outstanding paper offers a thought-provoking definition of a human society as an identity group. This commentary reflects on the centrality of shared group identification in societies, and discusses two important phenomena related to group identity, that is (i) the perceived temporal persistence of the group, and (ii) the processes leading to group fragmentation and schism.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Ellemers, N. (2012). The group self. Science, 336(6083), 848–852. doi: 10.1126/science.1220987CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, A. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 223. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.223CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reicher, S., Spears, R., & Haslam, S. A. (2010). The social identity approach in social psychology. In Wetherell, M. & Mohanty, C. T. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of identities (pp. 45–62). Sage Publications. ISBN 978-1-4129-3411-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sani, F. (2005). When subgroups secede: Extending and refining the social psychological model of schism in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(8), 1074–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204274092Google ScholarPubMed
Sani, F., Bowe, M., & Herrera, M. (2008). Perceived collective continuity and social wellbeing: Exploring the connections. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(2), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.461Google Scholar
Sani, F., Bowe, M., Herrera, M., Manna, C., Cossa, T., Miao, X., & Zhou, Y. (2007). Perceived collective continuity: Seeing groups as entities that move through time. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(6), 1118–1134. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sani, F., & Reicher, S. (1999). Identity, argument and schism: Two longitudinal studies of the split in the Church of England over the ordination of women to the priesthood. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2(3), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430299023005Google Scholar
Target article
What is a society? Building an interdisciplinary perspective and why that's important
Related commentaries (24)
A nation by any other name: A failure to focus on function
Belonging to a community of moral values as a key criterion of society
Beyond biology: A sociological stance on what is society
Collective memories and understandings of human societies
Definitions and cultural dynamics in understanding “societies”
Do boundaries matter so much for societies?
Group identity without social interactions?
How an interdisciplinary study of societies can develop a comprehensive understanding of the function of deceptive behavior
Identity groups, perceived group continuity, and schism
Identity is probably too complicated to serve as a useful criterion for defining society
Multi-species societies
Philosophy or science of societies?
Psychological mechanisms for individual recognition- and anonymous-societies in humans and other animals
Revisiting the spaces of societies and the cooperation that sustains them
Societal inferences from the physical world
Societies have functions for individuals and collectives
Societies of the open ocean without territories
Societies, identities, and macrodemes
Society: An anthropological perspective
The family as the primary social group
Understanding the jaggedness in social complexity is more important
Vocalizations are ideal identity signals
What is a society in the case of multilevel societies?
Why societies are important and grow so large: Tribes, nations, and teams
Author response
A society as a clearly membered, enduring, territory-holding group