No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Hierarchy, multidomain modules, and the evolution of intelligence
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 August 2017
Abstract
In this commentary, we support a complex, mosaic, and multimodal approach to the evolution of intelligence. Using the arcuate fasciculus as an example of discontinuity in the evolution of neurobiological architectures, we argue that the strict dichotomy of modules versus G, adopted by Burkart et al. in the target article, is insufficient to interpret the available statistical and experimental evidence.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017
Target article
The evolution of general intelligence
Related commentaries (28)
G and g: Two markers of a general cognitive ability, or none?
G but not g: In search of the evolutionary continuity of intelligence
A pointer's hypothesis of general intelligence evolved from domain-specific demands
An all-positive correlation matrix is not evidence of domain-general intelligence
Coexistence of general intelligence and specialized modules
Contemporary evolutionary psychology and the evolution of intelligence
Disentangling learning from knowing: Does associative learning ability underlie performances on cognitive test batteries?
Domains of generality
Evolution, brain size, and variations in intelligence
General intelligence does not help us understand cognitive evolution
General intelligence is a source of individual differences between species: Solving an anomaly
General intelligence is an emerging property, not an evolutionary puzzle
Genomic data can illuminate the architecture and evolution of cognitive abilities
Habit formation generates secondary modules that emulate the efficiency of evolved behavior
Hierarchy, multidomain modules, and the evolution of intelligence
It's time to move beyond the “Great Chain of Being”
Negative results are needed to show the specific value of a cultural explanation for g
Of mice and men, nature and nurture, and a few red herrings
Taking a multiple intelligences (MI) perspective
The evolution of analytic thought?
The evolution of fluid intelligence meets formative g
The evolution of general intelligence in all animals and machines
The false dichotomy of domain-specific versus domain-general cognition
Theory of mind: A foundational component of human general intelligence
Understanding the relationship between general intelligence and socio-cognitive abilities in humans
When does cultural transmission favour or instead substitute for general intelligence?
Where is the evidence for general intelligence in nonhuman animals?
“Birdbrains” should not be ignored in studying the evolution of g
Author response
Future directions for studying the evolution of general intelligence