No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The family as the primary social group
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 April 2025
Abstract
Moffett contends that societies should be considered the “primary” group with respect to their social ramifications. Although intriguing, this claim suffers from insufficient clarity and evidence. Rather, if any group is to be crowned supreme it should surely be the family, with its unique capacity to encourage pro-group behavior, shape other groups, and provide meaning.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Buhrmester, M. D., Fraser, W. T., Lanman, J. A., Whitehouse, H., & Swann, W. B. (2015). When terror hits home: Identity fused Americans who saw Boston bombing victims as “family” provided aid. Self and Identity, 14(3), 253–270. http://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2014.992465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez, A., Vázquez, A., Alba, B., Blanco, L., Chinchilla, J., Chiclana, S., & Swann, W. B. Jr. (2024). Feeling understood fosters identity fusion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000464CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, A. L., Crawford, M. T., Sherman, S. J., Rutchick, A. M., Hamilton, D. L., Ferreira, M. B., & Petrocelli, J. V. (2006). A functional perspective on group memberships: Differential need fulfillment in a group typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(6), 707–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.08.002Google Scholar
Klein, J. W., & Bastian, B. (2023). The fusion-secure base hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 27(2), 107–127. https://10.1177/10888683221100883Google ScholarPubMed
Klein, J. W., Greenaway, K. H., & Bastian, B. (2024). Identity fusion is associated with outgroup trust and social exploration: Evidence for the fusion-secure base hypothesis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 63(3), 1184–1206. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12724CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krys, K., Capaldi, C.A., Zelenski, J.M., Park, P., Nader, M., Kocimska-Zych, A., … Uchida, Y. (2021). Family well-being is valued more than personal well-being: A four-country study. Current Psychology, 40, 3332–3343 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00249-2Google Scholar
Leach, C. W., Van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., … Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pew Research Center. (2021). What makes life meaningful? Views from 17 advanced economies [report]. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2021/11/18/what-makes-life-meaningful-views-from-17-advanced-economies/Google Scholar
Sutton, T. E. (2019) Review of attachment theory: Familial predictors, continuity and change, and intrapersonal and relational outcomes. Marriage & Family Review, 55(1), 1–22. 10.1080/01494929.2018.1458001Google Scholar
Swann, W. B., & Buhrmester, M. D. (2015). Identity fusion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(1), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414551363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swann, W. B., Buhrmester, M. D., Gómez, A., Jetten, J., Bastian, B., Vazquez, A., … Zhang, A. (2014). What makes a group worth dying for? Identity fusion fosters perception of familial ties, promoting self-sacrifice. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 106(6), 912–926. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036089CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swann, W. B., Klein, J. W., & Gómez, Á. (2024). Comprehensive Identity Fusion Theory (CIFT): New insights and a revised theory. In Gawronski, B. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 70, pp. 275–332). Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, H., McQuinn, B., Buhrmester, M., & Swann, W. B. Jr. (2014). Brothers in arms: Libyan revolutionaries bond like family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(50), 17783–17785. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416284111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Target article
What is a society? Building an interdisciplinary perspective and why that's important
Related commentaries (24)
A nation by any other name: A failure to focus on function
Belonging to a community of moral values as a key criterion of society
Beyond biology: A sociological stance on what is society
Collective memories and understandings of human societies
Definitions and cultural dynamics in understanding “societies”
Do boundaries matter so much for societies?
Group identity without social interactions?
How an interdisciplinary study of societies can develop a comprehensive understanding of the function of deceptive behavior
Identity groups, perceived group continuity, and schism
Identity is probably too complicated to serve as a useful criterion for defining society
Multi-species societies
Philosophy or science of societies?
Psychological mechanisms for individual recognition- and anonymous-societies in humans and other animals
Revisiting the spaces of societies and the cooperation that sustains them
Societal inferences from the physical world
Societies have functions for individuals and collectives
Societies of the open ocean without territories
Societies, identities, and macrodemes
Society: An anthropological perspective
The family as the primary social group
Understanding the jaggedness in social complexity is more important
Vocalizations are ideal identity signals
What is a society in the case of multilevel societies?
Why societies are important and grow so large: Tribes, nations, and teams
Author response
A society as a clearly membered, enduring, territory-holding group