Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:48:46.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The dual systems in temporal cognition: A spatial analogy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2019

Andrea Roselli*
Affiliation:
Philosophy Department, Durham University, DurhamDH1 3LE, United Kingdom. [email protected]

Abstract

The model presented by the authors can explain an inherent contradiction in people's naïve theory of time. In this commentary I suggest a way in which another paradox of our phenomenal temporality may be addressed along these lines. In the final section, I also discuss some concerns that may arise about the clear-cut distinction between humans and non-human animals.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Camos, V. & Tillmann, B. (2008) Discontinuity in the enumeration of sequentially presented auditory and visual stimuli. Cognition 107:1135–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, T. W. & Volkmann, J. (1949) The discrimination of visual number. The American Journal of Psychology 62(4):498525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roselli, A. (2018) Temporal subitizing and temporal counting: a proposal between vision and action. RIFAJ, Rivista Italiana di Filosofia Analitica Junior 9(2). https://doi.org/10.13130/2037-4445/11096.Google Scholar
Savage-Rumbaugh, S. & Lewin, R. (1996) Kanzi: The ape at the brink of the human mind. Turner.Google Scholar
Trick, L. M. & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994) Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review 101(1):80102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed