Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-wjqwx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-16T01:06:36.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do boundaries matter so much for societies?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2025

Colin A. Chapman Open the ORCID record for Colin A. Chapman [Opens in a new window]
Colin A. Chapman*
Affiliation:
Biology Department, Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, BC, Canada [email protected] ChapmanColin.com School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa Shaanxi Key Laboratory for Animal Conservation, Northwest University, Xi'an, China
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Moffett's definition of society is broadly applicable to all group-living animals from insects to nation states. Presenting examples from primates, I illustrate difficulties in defining boundaries between societies and even what societies defend to demonstrate the complexity of using an understanding of the processes effecting primate societies to understand those effecting human societies. However, finding similarities and differences in processes shaping societies is intriguing and Moffett's definition provides an excellent starting point.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e60
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abd Hair Awang, J. S., Bakar, N. R. A., Abdullah, M. Y., & Liu, O. P. (2013). Informal cross-border trade Sarawak (Malaysia)-Kalimantan (Indonesia): A catalyst for border community's development. Asian Social Science, 9(4), 167–173.Google Scholar
Brown, J. L., & Orians, G. H. (1970). Spacing patterns in mobile animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1(1), 239–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golub, S. (2015). Informal cross-border trade and smuggling in Africa Handbook on trade and development (pp. 179–209). Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Green, E. (2012). On the size and shape of African states. International Studies Quarterly, 56(2), 229–244.Google Scholar
Harris, T. R., & Chapman, C. A. (2007). Variation in diet and ranging of black and white colobus monkeys in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Primates, 48, 208–221.Google ScholarPubMed
Kalbitzer, U., Golooba, M., & Chapman, C. A. (2023). Site fidelity and home range shifts in a leaf-eating primate. In Reyna-Hurtado, R., Melletti, M. & Chapman, C. A. (Eds.), Movement ecology of Afrotropical forest mammals (pp. 99–113). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, R. E., Dunn, J. C., Illera, G., Walsh, P. D., & Bermejo, M. (2020a). Western gorilla space use suggests territoriality. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 3692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, R. E., Hirwa, J. P., Mucyo, J. P. S., Stoinski, T. S., Vecellio, V., & Eckardt, W. (2020b). Inter-group relationships influence territorial defence in mountain gorillas. Journal of Animal Ecology, 89(12), 2852–2862.Google ScholarPubMed
Seiler, N., & Robbins, M. M. (2020). Using long-term ranging patterns to assess within-group and between-group competition in wild mountain gorillas. BMC Ecology, 20, 1–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Titeca, K. (2020). Informal cross-border trade along the Uganda-DRC Border. Borderland Policy Series 2 (pp. 1–21). University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
WorldEconomicForum. (2021). How has the European map evolved over time? Retrieved May 26, 2024, 2024, from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/11/european-map-has-changed-over-2-400-years-history/Google Scholar