Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:03:22.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognitive universals and cultural variation in teaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2015

Sidney Strauss ,
Margalit Ziv  and
Douglas Frye
Sidney Strauss
Affiliation:
School of Psychology and School of Education, Center for Academic Studies, Or Yehuda, Israel. [email protected] School of Education, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Margalit Ziv
Affiliation:
Al-Qasemi Academic College of Education, Baqa-El-Gharbia, 3010000, Israel. [email protected]
Douglas Frye
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We address three issues: (1) There is a need for a comprehensive multidisciplinary understanding of teaching; (2) teaching is a natural cognitive ability for humans; and (3) there is a need to incorporate the mentalistic and cultural approaches to teaching. We suggest certain research studies that can help deepen our understanding of the cognition of teaching.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 38 , 2015 , e67
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartsch, K., Wright, J. C. & Estes, D. (2010) Young children's persuasion in everyday conversations: Tactics and attunement to others' minds. Social Development 19(2):394–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00537.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R., Richerson, P. J. & Henrich, J. (2011) The cultural niche: Why social learning is essential for human adaptation. [Colloquium Paper]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 108(Suppl. 2):10918–25. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100290108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dessus, P., Mandin, S. & Zampa, V. (2008) What is teaching? Cognitive-based tutoring principles for the design of a leaning environment. In: Common innovation in e-learning, machine learning and humanoid (ICHLS6), ed. Tazi, S. & Zreik, K., pp. 49–55. Europia/IREEE.Google Scholar
Frye, D. & Ziv, M. (2005) Teaching and learning as intentional activities. In: The development of social cognition and communication, ed. Homer, B. D. & Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., pp. 231–58. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hasson, U., Ghazanfar, A. A., Galantucci, B., Garrod, S. & Keysers, C. (2012) Brain-to-brain coupling: A mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Science 16(2):114–21. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hewlett, B. S., Fouts, H. N., Boyette, A. H. & Hewlett, B. L. (2011) Social learning among Congo Basin hunter-gatherers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366:1168–78. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holper, L., Goldin, A. P., Shalom, D. E., Battro, A. M., Wolf, M. & Sigman, M. (2013) The teaching and the learning brain. A cortical hemodynamic marker of teacher-student interactions in the Socratic dialog. International Journal of Educational Research 59:1–10. Available at: http://neuro.org.ar/sites/neurociencia.df.uba.ar/files/2013_goldin_holper_battro_NIRS_m eno_dialgo_IJER_2013.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, M. A., Boyd, R. & Henrich, J. (2013) Teaching and the life history of cultural transmission in Fijian villages. Human Nature 24(4):351–74. doi: 10.1007/s12110-013-9180-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knudsen, B. & Liszkowski, U. (2012a) Eighteen and 24-month-old infants correct others in anticipation of action mistakes. Developmental Science 15(1):113–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01098.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knudsen, B. & Liszkowski, U. (2012b) 18-month-olds predict specific action mistakes through attribution of false belief, not ignorance, and intervene accordingly. Infancy 17:672–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2011.00105.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopp, K. J., Britt, M. A., Millis, K. & Graesser, A. C. (2012) Improving the efficiency of dialogue in tutoring. Learning and Instruction 22:320–30. doi: 10.1016/jlearninstruc.s011.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancy, D. F. (2010) Learning “from nobody”: The limited role of teaching in folk models of children's development. Childhood in the Past 3(1):79–106. Available at: http://www.maneyonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/cip.2010.3.1.79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, T. J. H., Uomini, N. T., Rendell, L. E., Chouinard-Thuly, L., Street, S. E., Lewis, H. M., Cross, C. P., Evans, C., Kearney, R., de la Torre, I., Whiten, A., & Laland, K. N. (2015) Experimental evidence for the co-evolution of hominin tool-making teaching and language. Nature Communications 6(6029):1–8. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paradise, R. & Rogoff, B. (2009) Side by side: Learning through observing and pitching in. Ethos 37(1):102–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1352.2009.01033.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (2010) The cognitive niche: Coevolution of intelligence, sociality, and language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 107(Suppl. 2):8993–99. Available at: http://www.pnas.org/content/107/suppl.2/8993.long.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheffler, I. (1965) Philosophical models of teaching. Harvard Educational Review 35(2):131–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, S. (2005) Teaching as a natural cognitive ability: Implications for classroom practice and teacher education. In: Developmental psychology and social change, ed. Pillemer, D. & White, S., pp. 368–88. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, S. (2013) A call for a multidisciplinary approach to the scientific study of teaching: Inspirations from Howard Gardner. In: Mind, work, and life: A Festschrift on the occasion of Howard Gardner's 70th birthday, with an introduction and comments by Howard Gardner (Vol. 2), ed. Kornhaber, M. & Winner, E., pp. 474–94. The Offices of Howard Gardner.Google Scholar
Strauss, S., Calero, C. I. & Sigman, M. (2014) Teaching, naturally. Trends in Neuroscience and Education 3:38–43. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2014.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, S. & Ziv, M. (2012) Teaching is a natural cognitive ability among humans. Mind, Brain and Education 6(4):186–96. doi: 10.1111/j1751-228X.2012.01156.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, S., Ziv, M. & Stein, A. (2002) Teaching as a natural cognition and its relations to preschoolers' developing theory of mind. Cognitive Development 17:1473–87. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2014(02)00128-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vollmer, A.-L., Muhlig, M., Steil, J. J., Pitsch, K., Fritsch, J., Rohlfing, K. J. & Wrede, B. (2014) Robots show us how to teach them: Feedback from robots shapes tutoring behavior during action learning. PLOS ONE 9(3):e19349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed