Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:58:29.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The stimulus-response crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2022

Robyn Wilford ,
Juan Ardila-Cifuentes ,
Edward Baggs  and
Michael L. Anderson Open the ORCID record for Michael L. Anderson [Opens in a new window]
Robyn Wilford
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, ONN6A 3K7, [email protected]
Juan Ardila-Cifuentes
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Western Ontario, London, ONN6A 3K7, [email protected]
Edward Baggs
Affiliation:
The Rotman Institute of Philosophy, University of Western Ontario, London, ONN6A 3K7, [email protected]
Michael L. Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Western Ontario, London, ONN6A 3K7, [email protected] The Rotman Institute of Philosophy, University of Western Ontario, London, ONN6A 3K7, [email protected] The Brain and Mind Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London, ONN6A 3K7, Canada. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Yarkoni correctly recognizes that one reason for psychology's generalizability crisis is the failure to account for variance within experiments. We argue that this problem, and the generalizability crisis broadly, is a necessary consequence of the stimulus-response paradigm widely used in psychology research. We point to another methodology, perturbation experiments, as a remedy that is not vulnerable to the same problems.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e39
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adolph, K. E., Eppler, M. A., & Gibson, E. J. (1993). Crawling versus walking infants’ perception of affordances for locomotion over sloping surfaces. Child Development, 64(4), 1158–1174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baggs, E., Raja, V., & Anderson, M. L. (2020). Extended skill learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1956. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damasio, H., Grabowski, T., Frank, R., Galaburda, A. M., & Damasio, A. R. (1994). The return of Phineas Gage: Clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient. Science, 264(5162), 1102–1105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danziger, K. (1994). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3(4), 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E. J., & Walk, R. D. (1960). The “visual cliff.” Scientific American, 202(4), 64–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Reed, E. S. (1996). Encountering the world: Toward an ecological psychology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar