Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T18:21:37.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Negativity bias and political preferences: A response to commentators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2014

John R. Hibbing ,
Kevin B. Smith  and
John R. Alford
John R. Hibbing
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588. [email protected]@unl.eduwww.unl.edu/polphyslab
Kevin B. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588. [email protected]@unl.eduwww.unl.edu/polphyslab
John R. Alford
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Rice University, Houston, TX 77251. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A broad, multidisciplinary empirical literature reports that individual-level differences in psychology and biology map onto variation in political orientation. In our target article we argued that negativity bias can explain a surprisingly large share of these findings. The commentators generally support the negativity bias hypothesis but suggest theoretical and empirical revisions and refinements. In this response, we organize these proposals, suggestions, and criticisms into four thematic categories and assess their potential for furthering theories and empirical investigations of the bases for individual-variation in political ideology.

Type
Authors' Response
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , June 2014 , pp. 333 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aron, E. N. & Aron, A. (1997) Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73(2):345–68.Google Scholar
Boehnke, K., Schwartz, S. H., Stromberg, C. & Sagiv, L. (1998) The structure and dynamics of worry: Theory, measurement and cross-national replications. Journal of Personality 66:745–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouchard, T. J. Jr. (2009) Authoritarianism, religiousness and conservatism: Is “obedience to authority” the explanation for their clustering, universality and evolution? In: The biological evolution of religious mind and behaviour, ed. Voland, E. & Schiefenhövel, W., pp. 165–80. Springer.Google Scholar
Carmines, E. G. & Stimson, J. A. (1980) The two faces of issue voting. American Political Science Review 74:78–91.Google Scholar
Dodd, M. D., Balzer, A., Jacobs, C. M., Gruszczynski, M. W., Smith, K. B. & Hibbing, J. R. (2012) The political left rolls with the good; the political right confronts the bad. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences 367(1589):640–49.Google Scholar
Frank, T. (2004) What's the matter with Kansas. Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Hirsh, J. B., DeYoung, C. G., Xu, X. & Peterson, J. B. (2010) Compassionate liberals and polite conservatives: Associations of agreeableness with political ideology and moral values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36(5):655–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Graham, J., Ditto, P. H. & Haidt, J. (2012) Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological roots of an individualist ideology. PLos ONE 7(8):e42366.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M. & Napier, J. L. (2009) Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology 60:307–37.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129(3):339–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, B. J. & Bartels, B. L. (2011) Politics at the checkout line: Explaining political consumerism in the United States. Political Research Quarterly 64(4):803–17.Google Scholar
Norris, C. J., Larsen, J. T., Crawford, L. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (2011) Better (or worse) for some than others: Individual differences in the positivity offset and negativity bias. Journal of Research in Personality 45:100–11.Google Scholar
Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, M. V., Miller, J. L., Scalora, M., Hatemi, P. K. & Hibbing, J. R. (2008) Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science 321(5896):1667–70.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. B. (2012) Social welfare as small-scale help: Evolutionary psychology and the deservingness heuristic. American Journal of Political Science 56(1):1–16.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2011) The better angels of our nature. Penguin.Google Scholar
Poole, K. & Rosenthal, H. (1997) Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, K. B., Oxley, D. R., Hibbing, M. V., Alford, J. R. & Hibbing, J. R. (2011) Disgust sensitivity and the neurophysiology of left-right political orientations. PloS ONE 6(10):1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed