Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-j4qg9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T23:02:40.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The New versus the Old in Austrian Economic History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2009

Richard L. Rudolph
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In their discussion of my modest contribution on the character of Austrian industrialization, my esteemed colleagues Eduard März and Herbert Matis have raised a number of questions regarding the “new economic history,” the nature of historical inquiry, epistemology, and the value of my conclusions. In addition, they have both, and Prof. März in particular, raised a number of suggestive hypotheses—if I may be forgiven the use of the word—in regard to the character of Austrian economic development. Needless to say, in this brief reply I cannot discuss all the points touched upon in their discussion. However, I would like to deal with those which strike me as the most significant.

Type
Economic and Social History
Information
Austrian History Yearbook , Volume 11 , January 1975 , pp. 37 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Center for Austrian Studies, University of Minnesota 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Magister Ludi (The Glass Bead Game) (New York: Bantam Books, 1970), p. 398.

2 See, for example, Matis, Herbert, Österreichs Winschaft 1848–1913 (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1972).Google Scholar

3 “Beyond the New Economic History,” Journal of Economic History, Vol. XXXIV, No. I (March, 1974), p. 2Google Scholar.

4 März, Eduard, Österreichische Industrie- und Bankpolitik in der Zeit Franz Joseph I., am Beispiel der k. k. priv. Ösierreichischen Creditansiall für Handel und Gewerbe (Vienna: Europa Verlag, 1968), p. 16Google Scholar.

5 Krantz, Frederick and Hohenberg, Paul M. (eds.), Failed Transitions to Modern Industrial Society: Renaissance Italy and Seventeenth Century Holland (Montreal: Interuniversity Centre for European Studies, First International Colloquium, Proceedings, April 18–20, 1974)Google Scholar.

6 Eddie, Scott M., “The Terms of Trade as a Tax on Agriculture: Hungary's Trade with Austria, 1883–1913,” Journal of Economic History, Vol. XXXII, No. I (March, 1972), pp. 298–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Katus, L., “Economic Growth in Hungary during the Age of Dualism (1867–1913). A Quantitative Analysis,” in Pamlényi, Ervin (ed.), Social- Economic Researches on the History of East-Central Europe (Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1970)Google Scholar; and Iván T. Berend and György Ránki, “Nationaleinkommen und Kapitalakkumulation in Ungarn,1867–1914,” ibid.