Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:18:59.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Red Dirt Thinking on Child Wellbeing in Indigenous, Rural and Remote Australian Communities: The SpICE Model “I just don't want my kid to struggle like I did at school”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2013

Kendall Clarke  and
Marijke Denton
Kendall Clarke*
Affiliation:
Indigenous Affairs Group, Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Marijke Denton
Affiliation:
Albury Community Health Centre, Murrumbidgee Local Health District, Albury, New South Wales, Australia
*
address for correspondence: Kendall Clarke, 1245 Table Top Road, Table Top NSW 2640, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Supporting children in their early development and learning has long-term benefits for both them and the broader community. Yet in Australia we still have significant examples of inequality of opportunity (Allan, 2010) and other structural barriers to family wellbeing, particularly in Indigenous and rural and remote communities (Bourke, Humphreys, Wakerman, & Taylor, 2012). One of the structural barriers is the frequently siloed approach to addressing issues around child wellbeing and learning, when a collaborative effort results in more effective and sustainable outcomes. Red Dirt (Indigenous, rural and remote) communities are fertile ground for the emergence of partnership models that provide solutions to perennial, complex community issues and siloed service provision that impact on learning outcomes. The aim of this article is to provide a background and commentary to contribute to the discussion about what works to promote child wellbeing in Australia and put forward the SpICE Model as part of the solution. Drawing on a body of literature and experiences in the field, this article will introduce a model for collaboration that should contribute to child wellbeing: the Specialist Integrated Community Engagement (SpICE) Model. First, we give an overview of the context of adversity as it specifically relates to educational outcomes for children. The principles underpinning the SpICE Model, on how to harness opportunity from adversity, are also described as they provide insight into how to achieve sustainable change in this context. In conclusion, some of the potential challenges of embedding SpICE into practice are discussed. The argument developed throughout this article is that the SpICE Model has currency for a wide range of education, health, disability and welfare collaborations and how they impact on child, family and community wellbeing.

Keywords

Indigenousspecialistchild wellbeingengagementrural and remotecollaboration
Type
Research Article
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 42 , Special Issue 2: Red dirt thinking on remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander education , December 2013 , pp. 136 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allan, J.P.M. (2010). What is health anyway?: Perceptions and experiences of health and health care from socio-economically disadvantaged rural residents. Rural Society, 20 (1), 85–97. doi:10.5172/rsj.20.1.85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, M., & Kent, J. (2004). Social impacts of drought: A report to NSW Agriculture. Wagga Wagga, Australia: Centre for Rural Social Research, Charles Sturt University.Google Scholar
Armstrong, K., & Kendall, E. (2010). Translating knowledge into practice and policy: The role of knowledge networks in primary health care. Health Information Management Journal, 39 (2), 9–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). (2012). Austalia's health 2012 (Cat. no. AUS 156). Canberra, Australia: Author. Retrieved from http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=10737422169.Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) & Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS). (2011). What works to overcome Indigenous disadvantage: key learnings and gaps in the evidence. Canberra, Australia: Author. Retrieved from http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=10737422169Google Scholar
Austalian National Audit Office (ANAO). (2007). Whole of Government Indigenous service delivery arrangements. Audit report No. 10 2007–08. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from http://www.anao.gov.au/~/media/Uploads/Documents/2007%2008_audit_report_101.pdfGoogle Scholar
Australian Public Service Commission (APSC). (2007). Tackling wicked problems: A public policy perspective. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government.Google Scholar
Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth (ARACY). (2010). Background reading, national action plan for young Australians inaugural workshop. Canberra, Australia: Author.Google Scholar
Baum, F. (2007). Cracking the nut of health equity: Top down and bottom up pressure for action on the social determinants of health. Promotion and Education, 14 (2), 90–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourke, L., Humphreys, J. S., Wakerman, J., & Taylor, J. (2012). Understanding rural and remote health: A framework for analysis in Australia. Health & Place, 18 (3), 496–503. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.02.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, E. (1995). A truly civil society. Sydney, Australia: ABC Books.Google Scholar
Dale, A., & Newman, L. (2010). Social capital: a necessary and sufficient condition for sustainable community development? Community Development Journal, 45 (1), 5–21. Retrieved from Oxford Journals website: doi:10.1093/cdj/bsn028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denhardt, R.B., & Denhardt, J.V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60 (6), 549–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2013). A snapshot of early childhood development in Australia 2012 — Australian Early Development Index (AEDI) National report. Canberra, Australia: Author. Retrieved from http://www.rch.org.au/aedi/Google Scholar
Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA). (2012). Closing the gap: Prime Minister's report 2012. Canberra, Australia: Author. Retrieved from http://www.fahcsia.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/05_2012/closing_the_gap_2012.pdfGoogle Scholar
Department of Health (DoH). (2007). Directions for health in NSW — Towards 2025. Sydney, Australia: Author. Retrieved from http://www0.health.nsw.gov.au/pubs/2007/pdf/future_directions.pdf.Google Scholar
Dew, K., Howden-Chapman, P., & Matheson, A. (2005). Engaging communities to reduce health inequalities: why partnership? Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 26, 1–16.Google Scholar
Gleeson, B. (2012). Coordinator General for remote Indigenous services — Six monthly report: April 2012 to September 2012. Canberra, Australia: Office of the Coordinator General for Remote Indigenous Services (CGRIS). Retrieved from http://www.cgris.gov.au/site/sep-2012.aspGoogle Scholar
Hislop, D. (2004). The paradox of communities of practice: Knowledge sharing between communities. In Hildreth, P. & Kimble, C. (Eds.), Knowledge networks: Innovation through communities of practice (pp. 36–46). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, S. (2010). Early childhood service development and intersectoral collaboration in rural Australia. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 16 (1), 40–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lasker, R.D., & Weiss, E.S. (2003). Broadening participation in community problem solving: a multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 80 (1), 14–47; discussion 48–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matheson, A.K.J. (2009). Complexity, evaluation and the effectiveness of community-based interventions to reduce health inequalities. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 20 (3), 221–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maxwell, J. (2012). Teachers, time, staff and money: Committing to community consultation in high schools. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 41 (02), 120–130. doi:10.1017/jie.2012.31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormack, J., Harrison, L.J., McLeod, S., & McAllister, L. (2011). A nationally representative study of the association between Impairment at 4–5 years and children's life activities at 7–9 years. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 54 (5), 1328–1348. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0155)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLeod, S., & McKinnon, D.H. (2007). Prevalence of communication disorders compared with other learning needs in 14 500 primary and secondary school students. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 42, 37–59. doi:10.1080/13682820601173262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. (2011). Rural and remote health workforce innovation and reform strategy draft background paper. Health Workforce Australia. Retrieved from https://www.hwa.gov.au/sites/uploads/hwa-rural-and-remote-consultation-draft-background-paper-20110829c.pdfGoogle Scholar
Mulford, B. (2011). Teacher and school leader quality. Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Retrieved from http://www.aihw.gov.au/closingthegap/documents/resource_sheets/ctgc-rs05.pdfGoogle Scholar
O'Callaghan, A.M., McAllister, L., & Wilson, L. (2005). Barriers to accessing rural paediatric speech pathology services: Health care consumers’ perspectives. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 13 (3), 162–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okubo, D., & Weidman, K. (2000). Engaging the community in core public health functions. National Civic Review, 89 (4), 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, R. (2010). The provision of education to students with a disability or special needs. Sydney, Australia: Parliament of New South Wales. Retrieved from http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/Prod/parlment/committee.nsf/0/bd30607cceed0133ca25776200264698/$FILE/100716%20The%20provision%20of%20education%20to%20students%20with%20a%20disability.pdfGoogle Scholar
Penman, J.B. (2010). Adopting a proactive approach to good health: A way forward for rural Australians. Rural Society, 20 (1), 98–109. doi: 10.5172/rsj.20.1.98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shergold, P. (2004). Connecting government: Whole of government responses to Australia's priority challenges. Canberra Bulletin of Public Administration, 112, 11–14.Google Scholar
Tenbensel, T., Cumming, J., Ashton, T., & Barnett, P. (2008). Where there's a will, is there a way?: Is New Zealand's publicly funded health sector able to steer towards population health? Social Science & Medicine, 67 (7), 1143–1152. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trickett, E.J., Beehler, S., Deutsch, C., Green, L.W., Hawe, P., McLeroy, K., . . . Trimble, J.E. (2011). Advancing the Science of Community-Level Interventions. American Journal of Public Health, 101 (8), 1410–1419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed