Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:46:56.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Maui's Dolphin Challenge: Lessons From a School-Based Litter Reduction Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2016

Carly S. Townrow ,
Nick Laurence ,
Charlotte Blythe ,
Jenny Long  and
Niki Harré
Carly S. Townrow
Affiliation:
The University of Auckland, New Zealand
Nick Laurence
Affiliation:
The University of Auckland, New Zealand
Charlotte Blythe
Affiliation:
The University of Auckland, New Zealand
Jenny Long
Affiliation:
The University of Auckland, New Zealand
Niki Harré*
Affiliation:
The University of Auckland, New Zealand
*
Address for correspondence: Niki Harré, School of Psychology, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Maui's Dolphin Challenge was a litter reduction project that was run twice at a secondary school in Aotearoa New Zealand. The project drew on a theoretical framework encompassing four psycho-social principles: values, embodied learning, efficacy, and perceived social norms. It challenged students to reduce the litter at the school by offering to donate $200 a week for 3 weeks to help protect the endangered Maui's dolphin. However, for every piece of litter found, $1 would come off this total. The challenge was accompanied by feedback on progress, posters, assemblies, and videos. Both times it was run, litter dropped by approximately half. After the first iteration, a survey found that students (n = 275 surveys) appeared motivated not to litter primarily due to a desire to care for the Maui's dolphin. Interviews and a focus group with staff and students (n = 14) after the second iteration also found the dolphins were important, but there was a cultural norm against picking up litter. The limitations of the project, its impact on the school's sustainability culture, and implications for other whole-school environmental projects, especially those with a waste focus, are discussed.

Keywords

environmental educationcase studyyouthschoollittervalues
Type
Feature Articles
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , November 2016 , pp. 288 - 308
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blake, J. (1999). Overcoming the ‘value–action gap’ in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environment, 4, 257–278.Google Scholar
Blythe, C, Harré, N., Sharma, S., Dillon, V., Douglas, B., & Didsbury, A. (2013). Guiding principles for community engagement: Reflections on a school-based sustainability project. Journal of Social Action in Counseling and Psychology, 5, 44–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, V., & Clark, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. (2004). System failure: Why governments must learn to think differently (2nd ed.). London: Demos.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R.B., Reno, R.R., & Kallgren, C.A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026.Google Scholar
De Vreede, C., Warner, A., & Pitter, R. (2014). Facilitating youth to take sustainability actions: The potential of peer education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 45, 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eames, C., & Barker, M. (2011). Understanding student learning in environmental education in Aotearoa New Zealand. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 27, 186–191.Google Scholar
Eames, C., Cowie, B., & Bolstad, R. (2008). An evaluation of characteristics of environmental education practice in New Zealand schools. Environmental Education Research, 14, 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2012). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24, 56–62.Google Scholar
Gayford, C. (1996). Environmental education in schools: An alternative framework. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 1, 104–120.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998–1002.Google Scholar
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133, 55–66.Google Scholar
Harré, N. (2011). Psychology for a better world: Strategies to inspire sustainability. Auckland, New Zealand: Department of Psychology, University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Henderson, K., & Tilbury, D. (2004). Whole school approaches to sustainability: An international review of sustainable school programs. Sydney, Australia: Australian Research Institute in Education for Sustainability (ARIES) for the Department of the Environment and Heritage, Australian Government.Google Scholar
Higgs, A.L., & McMillan, V.M. (2006). Teaching through modeling: Four schools’ experiences in sustainability education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38, 39–53.Google Scholar
Hill, S.B., Wilson, S., & Watson, K. (2004). Learning ecology — A new approach to learning and transforming ecological consciousness: Experiences from social ecology in Australia. In O'Sullivan, E. & Taylor, M. (Eds.), Learning toward ecological consciousness: Selected transforming practices (pp. 47–64). New York: Palgrave Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, J.R., & Nielsen, J.M. (1991). Recycling as altruistic behavior: Normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program. Environment and Behavior, 23, 195–220.Google Scholar
Houghton, S. (1993). Using verbal and visual prompts to control littering in high schools. Educational Studies, 19, 247–254.Google Scholar
Hurrelmann, K., & Raithel, J. (2005). Risk behavior in adolescence: The relationship between developmental and health problems. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 12, 281–299.Google Scholar
Jordan, C. (Director). (2011). Midway [Motion picture]. New York: Possibility Entertainment.Google Scholar
Kahn, P.H. (2003). The development of environmental moral identity. In Clayton, S. & Opotow, S. (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment (pp. 113–134).Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kallgren, C.A., Reno, R.R., & Cialdini, R.B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behaviour. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1002–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, M. (2012). Eco-republic: What the ancients can teach us about ethics, virtue and sustainable living. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Monroe, M.C. (1991). Converting ‘It's no use’ into ‘Hey, there's a lot I can do’: A matrix for environmental action taking. Clearing, 67, 32–33.Google Scholar
Moreno, L., Henauw, S.D., Gonzalez-Gross, M., Kersting, M., Molnar, D., Gottrand, F., & Marcos, A. (2008). Design and implementation of the healthy lifestyle in Europe by nutrition in adolescence cross-sectional study. International Journal of Obesity, 32, 4–11.Google Scholar
Mullen, E., & Skitka, L.J. (2006). Exploring the psychological underpinnings of the moral mandate effect: Motivated reasoning, group differentiation, or anger? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 629–643.Google Scholar
Myers, O.G. (2007). The significance of children and animals: Social development and our connection to other species. West Lafatette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Nucci, L. (2001). Education in the moral domain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nucci, L. (2009). Nice is not enough: Facilitating moral development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of action research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Reno, R.R., Cialdini, R.B., & Kallgren, C.A. (1993). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 104–112.Google Scholar
Schelly, C., Cross, J.E., Franzen, W., Hall, P., & Reeve, S. (2012). How to go green: Creating a conservation culture in a public high school through education, modeling and communication. The Journal of Environmental Education, 43, 143–161.Google Scholar
Schultz, P.W., Bator, R.J., Large, L.B., Bruni, C.M., & Tabanico, J.J. (2013). Littering in context: Personal and environmental predictors of littering behavior. Environment and Behavior, 45, 35–59.Google Scholar
Shallcross, T., & Robinson, J. (2008). Sustainability education, whole school approaches, and communities of action. In Reid, A., Jensen, B.B., Nikel, J., & Simovska, V. (Eds.), Participation and learning: Perspectives on education and the environment, health and sustainability (pp. 299–320). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G.A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmental concern. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81–97.Google Scholar
Stevenson, R.B. (2004). Constructing knowledge of educational practices from case studies. Environmental Education Research, 10, 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolz, S.A. (2015). Embodied learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47, 474–487.Google Scholar
Story, M., Lytle, L.A., Birnbaum, A.S., & Perry, C.L. (2002). Peer led, school based nutrition education for young adolescents: Feasibility and process evaluation of the TEENS study. Journal of School Health, 72, 121–127.Google Scholar
Turiel, E. (2002). The culture of morality: Social development, context and conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Valente, T.W., & Davis, R.L. (1999). Accelerating the diffusion of innovations using opinion leaders. Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 566, 55–67.Google Scholar
Wals, A.E. (1996). Backalley sustainability and the role of environmental education. Local Environment, 1, 299–316.Google Scholar
Waste Not Consulting. (2013). NAME OF SCHOOL Waste Minimisation Project. Auckland, New Zealand: Author.Google Scholar
WWF New Zealand. (2013). Milena and the Maui's. Living Planet, (8), 3.Google Scholar