Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T20:32:25.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Core Attributes of Pro-Environmental Managers and Dynamics of Environmental Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2020

Asit Bhattacharyya  and
Kumar Biswas Open the ORCID record for Kumar Biswas [Opens in a new window]
Asit Bhattacharyya*
Affiliation:
School of Business and Law, Central Queensland University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Kumar Biswas
Affiliation:
Faculty of Business, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

By simply modifying management decisions towards an environmentally friendly approach, organisations can minimise their negative operational impacts on the environment. A key question is whether a manager’s pro-environmental decision-making behaviour can be determined by their personal characteristics. Our study hypothesised that three core attributes (personal values, attitudes, and subjective norms) of a person can predict their future pro-environmental behavioural intention — the closest proxy of actual pro-environmental behaviour. Using the theoretical lenses of Value-Attitude-Behaviour theory (VAB) and Value-Belief-Norm theory (VBN), we examined the roles of three core attributes of future business leaders (MBA students) on their intention to behave pro-environmentally. The results of structural equation modelling indicate that future managers’ environmental values, attitudes, and subjective norms are positively associated with their intentions related to pro-environmental behaviour. Mediation test of the structural model further indicates that environmental attitudes mediate the link between personal values and intention; however, subjective norms does not. Our results imply that effective recruitment and selection mechanisms may incorporate these attributes to assist organisations in the identification of environmentally responsible business leaders. By hiring environmentally responsible managers, organisations will be able to better fulfil their commitment towards sustainability outcomes.

Keywords

personal valuesattitudespro-environmental behaviour intentionsubjective norms
Type
Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 69 - 84
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I. (1993). Attitude theory and the attitude-behaviour relation. In Krebs, D. & Schmidt, D. (Eds.), New directions in attitude measurement (pp. 41–57). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ajzen, I. (2003). Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Ajzen, I., & Sheikh, S. (2013). Action versus inaction: Anticipated affect in the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andorfer, V.A., & Liebe, U. (2012). Research on fair trade consumption—A review. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 415–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 717–736.Google Scholar
Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batjargal, B., Hitt, M., Tsui, A., Arregle, J.-L., Webb, J., & Miller, T. (2012). Institutional polycentrism, entrepreneur’s social networks and new venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1024–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilsky, W., Janik, M., & Schwartz, S.H. (2011). The structural organization of human values: Evidence from three rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 759–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, Y., & Shannon, R. (2012). Personal values and mall shopping behavior: The mediating role of attitude and intention among Chinese and Thai consumers. Australasian Marketing Journal, 20, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrington, M.J., Neville, B.A., & Whitwell, G.J. (2010) Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, F., Ngniatedema, T., & Li, S. (2018). A cross-country comparison of green initiatives, green performance and financial performance. Management Decision, 56, 1008–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, W.W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., & Wang, H. (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 655–690). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, W.W., Marcolin, B.L., & Newsted, P.R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14, 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark Ehlers, G., Forrester, S.T., Scherr, K.E., Loibner, A.P., & Janik, L.J. (2010). Influence of the nature of soil organic matter on the sorption behaviour of pentadecane as determined by PLS analysis of mid-infrared DRIFT and solid-state < sup>13 C NMR spectra. Environmental Pollution, 158, 285–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cordano, M., & Frieze, I.H. (2000). Pollution reduction preferences of US environmental managers: Applying Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 627–641.Google Scholar
Cordano, M., Welcomer, S., Scherer, R.F., Pradenas, L., & Parada, V. (2011). A cross-cultural assessment of three theories of pro-environmental behavior: A comparison between Business students of Chile and the United States. Environment and Behavior, 43, 634–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cording, M., Christmann, P., & King, D.R. (2008). Reducing causal ambiguity in acquisition integration: Intermediate goals as mediators of integration decisions and acquisition performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 744–767.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R.E., Grieneeks, J.K., & Rokeach, M. (1983). Human values and pro-environmental behavior. In Conn, W.D. (Ed.), Energy and material resources: Attitudes, values, and public policy (pp. 145–168). Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R.E., & Mertig, A.G. (2014). American environmentalism: The US environmental movement, 1970–1990. Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durdyev, S., Ismail, S., Ihtiyar, A., Bakar, N.F.S.A., & Darko, A. (2018). A partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) of barriers to sustainable construction in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 564–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In Gilbert, D.T., Fiske, S.T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 269–322). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Ernst, A., & Wenzel, U. (2014). Bringing environmental psychology into action: Four steps from science to policy. European Psychologist, 19, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Reading.Google Scholar
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukukawa, K., Shafer, W.E., & Lee, G.M. (2007). Values and attitudes toward social and environmental accountability: A study of MBA students. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 381–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gantt, C.J. (2001). The theory of planned behavior and postpartum smoking relapse. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33, 337–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, G.T., & Stern, P.C. (1996). Environmental problems and human behavior. Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Golub, J. (2013). New instruments for environmental policy in the EU. Routledge.Google Scholar
Groth, M., Hennig-Thurau, T., & Walsh, G. (2009). Customer reactions to emotional labor: The roles of employee acting strategies and customer detection accuracy. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 958–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hair, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2012). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harland, P., Staats, H., & Wilke, H.A. (1999). Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by subjective norms and the Theory of Planned Behavior 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2505–2528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, A.F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hassan, L.M., Shiu, E., & Shaw, D. (2016). Who says there is an intention–behaviour gap? Assessing the empirical evidence of an intention–behaviour gap in ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 136, 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, P., Apaolaza, V., & D’Souza, C. (2018). The role of psychological empowerment in climate-protective consumer behaviour: An extension of the value-belief-norm framework. European Journal of Marketing, 52, 392–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, M.H. (2009). Statistical digital signal processing and modeling. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hillhouse, J.J., Adler, C.M., Drinnon, J., & Turrisi, R. (1997). Application of Azjen’s theory of planned behavior to predict sunbathing, tanning salon use, and sunscreen use intentions and behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 20, 365–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Homer, P.M., & Kahle, L.R. (1988). A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 54, 638–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C., Smith, A., & Conner, M. (2001). Applying an extended version of the theory of planned behaviour to physical activity. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21, 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, K., Petersen, L., Hörisch, J., & Battenfeld, D. (2018). Green thinking but thoughtless buying? An empirical extension of the value-attitude-behaviour hierarchy in sustainable clothing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 1155–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, D.G. (1996). Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 28, 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiatkawsin, K., & Han, H. (2017). Young travelers’ intention to behave pro-environmentally: Merging the value-belief-norm theory and the expectancy theory. Tourism Management, 59, 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulin, J., & Svallfors, S. (2013). Class, values, and attitudes towards redistribution: A European comparison. European Sociological Review 29(2): 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwan, B., & Bryan, A. (2010). Affective response to exercise as a component of exercise motivation: Attitudes, norms, self-efficacy, and temporal stability of intentions. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11, 71–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lord, R.G., & Brown, D.J. (2001). Leadership, values, & subordinate self-concepts. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, R. (2009). What constitutes a green business? https://earthmaven.io/planetwatch/energy-economics/what-constitutes-a-green-business--WainJnhrEKKI9VvqZ5-Hw/ Google Scholar
Milfont, T.L., Duckitt, J., & Wagner, C. (2010). A cross-cultural test of the value–attitude–behavior hierarchy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 2791–2813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molina-Azorín, J.F., Tarí, J.J., Pereira-Moliner, J., Lopez-Gamero, M.D., & Pertusa-Ortega, E.M. (2015). The effects of quality and environmental management on competitive advantage: A mixed methods study in the hotel industry. Tourism Management, 50, 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papagiannakis, G., & Lioukas, S. (2012). Values, attitudes and perceptions of managers as predictors of corporate environmental responsiveness. Journal of Environmental Management, 100, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podsakoff, P.M., & Organ, D.W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poortinga, W., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2004). Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior: A study into household energy use. Environment and Behavior, 36, 70–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., & Will, S. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta, Hamburg 2005.Google Scholar
Rise, J., Kovac, V., Kraft, P., & Moan, I.S. (2008). Predicting the intention to quit smoking and quitting behaviour: Extending the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 291–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rise, J., Kovac, V., Kraft, P., & Moan, I. (2008). Predicting the intention to quit smoking and quitting behaviour: Extending the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 291–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, P.W., & Zelezny, L. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S.H. (1968). Words, deeds and the perception of consequences and responsibility in action situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S.H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 221–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S.H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2016). Board attributes, corporate social responsibility strategy, and corporate environmental and social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 569–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shim, S., Warrington, P., & Goldsberry, E. (1999). A personal value-based model of college students’ attitudes and expected choice behavior regarding retailing careers. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 28, 28–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosik, J.J., Kahai, S.S., & Piovoso, M.J. (2009). Silver bullet or voodoo statistics? Group and Organization Management, 34, 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, P.C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G.A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81–98.Google Scholar
Su, J., Watchravesringkan, K.T., Zhou, J., & Gil, M. (2019). Sustainable clothing: perspectives from US and Chinese young millennials. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, S. (1998). Predicting and explaining intentions and behavior: How well are we doing?. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1317–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V.E., Chatelin, Y.M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 48, 159–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, K.L., Dmitrieva, A., & Adriasola, E. (2013). Changing behaviour: Increasing the effectiveness of workplace interventions in creating pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2013). I am what I am, by looking past the present: The influence of biospheric values and past behavior on environmental self-identity. Environment and Behavior, 46, 626–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wan, C., Shen, G.Q., & Yu, A. (2014). The moderating effect of perceived policy effectiveness on recycling intention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, Y., Zhu, X., Li, Y., Yao, T., & Tao, Y. (2019). Influential factors of national and regional CO2 emission in China based on combined model of DPSIR and PLS-SEM. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 698–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, K.M., & Hyde, M.K. (2012). The role of self-perceptions in the prediction of household recycling behavior in Australia. Environment and behavior 44(6): 785–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitley, C.T., Takahashi, B., Zwickle, A., Besley, J.C., & Lertpratchya, A.P. (2018). Sustainability behaviors among college students: An application of the VBN theory. Environmental Education Research, 24, 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, R.J.S., Scott, S.K., Blank, S.C., Mummery, C.J., Murphy, K., & Warburton, E.A. (2001). Separate neural subsystems withinWernicke’s area. Brain, 124, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Economic Forum. (2018), Why India is most at risk from climate change. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/03/india-most-vulnerable-country-to-climate-change Google Scholar
Yusof, N.A., Abidin, N.Z., Zailani, S.H.M., Govindan, K., & Iranmanesh, M. (2016). Linking the environmental practice of construction firms and the environmental behaviour of practitioners in construction projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121, 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar