Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:42:43.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teaching Interpersonal Problem-Solving Strategies to the Mildly Handicapped

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Sharon R. Wilson
Sharon R. Wilson*
Affiliation:
Department of Special Education, College of Education, University of Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An interpersonal problem is having a goal or desired interaction involving another person that is not being met. Interpersonal problems are an ongoing part of life. Whether it be deciding where to have lunch with a friend or your neighbour continually parking his car in front of your home, we are involved in interpersonal problems everyday. We are gregarious, and inherent within interaction with others in conflict. As educators we are continually aware of the number of interpersonal difficulties which occur within the classroom everyday.

Type
Research and Review
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , May 1982 , pp. 23 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachara, G. ‘Empathy in learning disabled children.’ Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1976, 43, 541–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruininks, V. L. ‘Actual and perceived peer status of learning disabled students in mainstream programs.’ The Journal of Special Education, 1978, 12, 51–58. (a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruininks, V. L. ‘Peer status and personality characterisics of learning disabled and nondisabled students.’ Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1978, 77, 484–489. (b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, T., Wheeler, R., Felcan, J., & Aenek, T. ‘Come on, dummy: An observational study of children’s communications.’ Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1976, 9, 661–669.Google Scholar
Bryan, T. ‘An observational analysis of classroom behaviours of children with learning disabilities.’ Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1974, 1, 26–43.Google Scholar
Bryan, T. ‘Peer popularity of learning disabled children: A replication.’ Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1976, 9, 307–311.Google Scholar
Bryan, T. ‘Learning disabled children’s comprehension of nonverbal communication.’ Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1977, 10, 36–41.Google Scholar
Bryan, T., & Bryan, J. Understanding Learning Disabilities (2nd. Ed.) Sherman Oaks, California: Alfred Publishing, 1978.Google Scholar
Intagliata, J. ‘Increasing the interpersonal problem-solving effectiveness of an alcoholic population.’ Unpublished doctoral dissertation. State University of New York at Buffalo, 1976.Google Scholar
Jacobson, N. A. ‘A review of the research on the effectiveness of marital therapy.’ In Paolino, T. J. and McGrady, B. S. (Eds.) Marriage and marital therapy: Psychoanalytic, behavioral and systems theory perspectives. New York: Brunner, Mazel, 1978.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. O. & Kirk, S. A. ‘Are mentally Handicapped children segregated in the regular grades?’ Exceptional Children, 1950, 17, 65–68.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. O. ‘A study of the social position of mentally handicapped children in the regular grades.’ American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1950, 55, 60–89.Google Scholar
McDaniel, J. ‘Group action in the rehabilitation of the mentally retarded,’ Group Psychotherapy, 1960, 13, 5–11.Google Scholar
Minskoff, E. H. ‘Teaching approach for developing nonverbal communication skills in students with social perception deficit-Part 1.’ Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980, 13, 118–124. (a).Google Scholar
Minskoff, E. H. ‘Teaching approach for developing nonverbal communication skills in students with social perception deficits – Part 2.’ Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980, 13, 203–208. (b).Google Scholar
Ridley, C. A., Avery, A. W., Harrell, I. E., Leslie, L. A., & Dent, J. ‘Conflict management: A premarital training program in mutual problem solving.’ American Journal of Family Therapy, in press.Google Scholar
Ridley, C. R., & Vaughn, S. R. Evaluating the efficacy of the cognitive interpersonal problem solving approach to preschool education. Paper presented at the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association, Tuscon, Arizona, 1980.Google Scholar
Spivack, G., & Levine, M. ‘Self-regulation in acting-out and normal adolescents.’ Report M-4531, National Institute of Health, Washington D.C., 1963.Google Scholar
Spivack, J., Platt, J., & Shure, M. The problem solving approach to adjustment: A guide to research and intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bas, 1974.Google Scholar
Vaughn, S. R. ‘A behavioral evaluation of a preschool interpersonal problem solving program.’ Unpublished dissertation, University of Arizona, 1981.Google Scholar
Wallace, G. & Kauffman, J. M. Teaching children with learning problems (2nd. Ed.) Columbus: Charles E. Merrill, 1978.Google Scholar