Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T22:39:22.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linear Stochastic Reserving Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2013

René Dahms
René Dahms*
Affiliation:
Nationale Suisse, Steinengraben 41, CH-4003 Basel, E-Mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article we want to motivate and analyse a wide family of reserving models, called linear stochastic reserving methods (LSRMs). The main idea behind them is the assumption that the (conditionally) expected changes of claim properties during a development period are proportional to exposures which depend linearly on the past. This means the discussion about the choice of reserving methods can be based on heuristic reasons about exposures driving the claims development, which in our opinion is much better than a pure philosophic approach. Moreover, the assumptions of LSRMs do not include the independence of accident periods.

We will see that many common reserving methods, like the Chain-Ladder-Method, the Bornhuetter-Ferguson-Method and the Complementary-Loss-Ratio-Method, can be interpreted in this way. But using the LSRM framework you can do more. For instance you can couple different triangles via exposures. This leads to reserving methods which look at a whole bundle of triangles at once and use the information of all triangles in order to estimate the future development of each of them.

We will present unbiased estimators for the expected ultimate and estimators for the mean squared error of prediction, which may become an integral part of IFRS 4. Moreover, we will look at the one period solvency reserving risk, which already is an important part of Solvency II, and present a corresponding estimator.

Finally we will present two examples that illustrate some features of LSRMs.

Keywords

Stochastic ReservingMean Squared Error of PredictionSolvency Reserving RiskClaims Development Result
Type
Research Article
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , May 2012 , pp. 1 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Braun, C. (2004) The prediction error of the chain ladder method applied to correlated run-off triangles. ASTIN Bulletin, 35, 399–423.Google Scholar
Buchwalder, M., Bühlmann, H., Merz, M. and Wüthrich, M.V. (2006) The mean square error of prediction in the chain ladder reserving method (Mack and Murphy revisited). ASTIN Bulletin, 36, 521–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahms, R. (2008) A loss reserving method for incomplete data. SAV Bulletin, 1–2, 127–148.Google Scholar
Dahms, R., Merz, M. and Wüthrich, M.V. (2009) Claims development result for combined claims incurred and claims paid data. Bulletin Français d'Actuariat 9, 18, 5–39.Google Scholar
Halliwell, L.J. (1997) Conjoint prediction of paid and incurred losses. CAS Forum (Summer), 1, 241–379.Google Scholar
Mack, T. (1993) Distribution-free calculation of the standard error of chain ladder reserve estimates. ASTIN Bulletin, 23(2), 213–225.Google Scholar
Mack, T. (1997) Schadenversicherungsmathematik. Karlsruhe, Verlag Versicherungswirtschaft.Google Scholar
Mack, T. (2008) The prediction error for Bornhuetter-Ferguson. ASTIN Bulletin, 38, 87–103.Google Scholar
Merz, M. and Wüthrich, M.V. (2006) A credibility approach to the Munich Chain-Ladder Method. Blätter DGVFM XXVII, 619–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merz, M. and Wüthrich, M.V. (2008) Stochastic Claims Reserving Methods in Insurance. New York – Chichester, Wiley.Google Scholar
Merz, M. and Wüthrich, M.V. (2010) Paid-incurred chain claims reserving method. Insurance: Math. & Econom., 46(3), 568–579.Google Scholar
Quarg, G. and Mack, T. (2004) Munich chain ladder. Blätter DGVFM XXVI, 597–630.Google Scholar