No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Adultery Law and State Power in Early Empires: China and Rome Compared
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 June 2024
Abstract
As ancient China and Rome transformed into empires, both states showed an increasing interest in regulating family ethics and individuals’ sexuality. Using excavated documents and transmitted texts, this article compares legal statutes and practices against illicit consensual sex in early imperial China (221 BCE–220 CE) with those in the Roman empire. On the one hand, both legal systems aimed at consolidating social hierarchies based on gender, status, and generation. On the other, the Roman and Chinese statutes had different emphases due to their respective political, social, and cultural contexts, and the actual penalties for adultery and incest differed significantly from those prescribed in the statutes. In both empires, control over individuals’ sexuality facilitated state power’s penetration into the family during empire-building, giving rise to laws in areas that had been largely left to customs and individual will.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Asian Journal of Law and Society
References
Agūi et al. (2015). Daqing lüli [The Qing Code]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju (original work published in 1790 CE).Google Scholar
Ban, G. (1962). Han shu [Book of Han]. Punctuated and collated by the Zhonghua shuju editorial team. Beijing: Zhong hua shu ju (original work published circa 54–80 CE).Google Scholar
Barbieri-Low, A. J. & Yates, R.. (2015). Law, State, and Society in Early Imperial China: A Study with Critical Edition and Translation of the Legal Texts from Zhangjiashan Tomb No. 247. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Beck, H. & Vankeerberghen, G., eds. (2021). Rulers and Ruled in Ancient Greece, Rome, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, S. (2017). “The Augustan Principate and the Emergence of Biopolitics: A Comparative Historical Perspective.” Foucault Studies, 22: 72–93.Google Scholar
Boatwright, M. T. (2021). Imperial Women of Rome: Power, Gender, Context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boatwright, M. T., Gargola, D. J., Lenski, N. & Talbert, R. J. A.. (2012). The Romans: From Village to Empire, 2nd edn. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ch’ü, T’-t. (1947). Zhongguo falü yu zhongguo shehui [Chinese Law and Chinese Society]. Shanghai: Shangwu yinshu guan.Google Scholar
Ch’ü, T’-t. (1948). “Zhongguo falü zhi rujia hua [The Confucianization of Chinese Law].” In Guoli Beijing daxue wushi zhounian jinian lunwen ji (Wenxue yuan di si zhong) [Collected Essays Commemorating the Fiftieth Anniversary of National Beijing University (Department of Literature, No.4)]. Beijing daxue chuban bu.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. (2001). Suitang zhidu yuanyuan lüelun gao [Draft of a Brief Discussion of the Origins of the Sui and Tang Institutions]. Beijing: Sanlian shudian.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. T. (2008). “Augustus, Julia and the Development of Exile ‘Ad Insulam’.” The Classical Quarterly, New Series, 58(1): 206–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Ligt, L. (2002). “Restraining the Rich, Protecting the Poor: Symbolic Aspects of Roman Legislation.” In Jongman, W. & Kleijwegt, M., eds., After the Past: Essays in Ancient History in Honour of H.W. Pleket, 1–45. Leiden, Netherlands & Boston, MA: Brill.Google Scholar
Cassius, Dio. (1924). Roman History, Vol. VII (Books 56–60). Translated by E. Cary & H. B. Foster. Loeb Classical Library No. 175. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2011). “Stuprum: Public Attitudes and Penalties for Sexual Offences in Republican Rome.” In Roman Readings: Roman Response to Greek Literature from Plautus to Statius and Quintilian, 115–43. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality, Vol. I: An Introduction. Translated by Hurley, R.. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Sheridan, A.. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2009). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collѐge de France 1977–1978. Edited by Davidson, A. I., translated by Burchell, G.. New York: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Frier, B. W., ed. (2016). The Codex of Justinian: A New Annotated Translation with Parallel Latin and Greek Text. Translated by Blume, F. H.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. F. (1986). Women in Roman Law and Society. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. (1967). “Adultery Trials and the Survival of the Quaestiones in the Severan Age.” Journal of Roman Studies, 57(1–2): 56–60.Google Scholar
Goldin, P. R. (2011). “Persistent Misconceptions about Chinese ‘Legalism’.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 38(1): 88–104.Google Scholar
Goldin, P. R. (2012). “Han Law and the Regulation of Interpersonal Relations: ‘The Confucianization of the Law’ Revisited.” Asian Major, 25(1), third series: 1–31.Google Scholar
Grubbs, J. E. (2015). “Making the Private Public: Illegitimacy and Incest in Roman law.” In Ando, C. & Rüpke, J., eds., Public and Private in Ancient Mediterranean Law and Religion, 115–41. Berlin, Munich & Boston: De Gruyter, EBSCO Digitized Edition.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, L. & Liu, J. (2009). “Qin Han shiqi de hejian zui-yi jiandu ziliao wei zhongxin de kaocha [The Hejian Crime in the Qin and Han Periods—an Investigation Centered on Materials from Bamboo and Wooden Slips].” Gudai Wenming [The Journal of Ancient Civilizations], 3(2): 78–83, 113–4.Google Scholar
He, J. (1990). Zhan guo ce zhu shi [Annotation of the Strategies of the Warring States]. Beijing: Zhong hua shu ju.Google Scholar
He, W. (1990). “Zhongguo gudai sifa panjue de fengge yu jingshen—Yi Songdai panjue wei jiben yiju jian yu yingguo bijiao [The Style and Spirit of the Judicial Decisions in Pre-Modern China— Taking Song Dynasty Judicial Decisions as the Basis and Comparing them with England’s].” Zhongguo Shehui Kexue [Social Sciences in China], 6: 203–19.Google Scholar
Hsing, I-t. (2008). “Qin huo Xi Han chu hejian an zhong suojian de qinshu lunli guanxi—Jiangling Zhangjiashan ersiqihao mu Zouyan shu jian 180–196 kaolun [Ethical Relationships as Seen in the Case of Adultery Recorded in the Judicial Case Anthology Unearthed from the Han Tomb No. 247 at Zhangjiashan, in Jiangling, Hubei Province].” In Liu, L., ed., Chuantong Zhongguo falü de linian yu shijian [The Ideas and Practices of Traditional Chinese Law], 101–59. Zhongyang Yanjiuyuan Lishi Yuyan Yanjiusuo huiyi lunwenji 8.Google Scholar
Hu, P. & Zhang, D.. (2001). Dunhuang xuanquan hanjian shicui [Interpretation of Valuable Selections from the Han Slips at the Dunhuang Xuanquan Postal Station]. Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe.Google Scholar
Jia, L. (2006). “Qin Han shiqi jian zui lun kao [Discussion and Examination of the ‘Jian’ Crime in the Qin and Han].” Hebei Faxue [Hebei Law Science], 4: 91–8.Google Scholar
Jingzhou bowu guan [The Jingzhou Museum], eds., Peng, H. (chief ed.). (2022). Zhangjiashan hanmu zhujian [sansanliu hao mu] (shang xia) [Bamboo Slips from the Zhangjiashan Han Tombs (No. 336)]. Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Kinney, A. B. (2022). “Husbands and Wives in Qin and Han-Dynasty Bamboo Legal Texts.” Journal of Chinese History 6(2): 225–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legge, J., trans. “Qu li shang” [Summary of the Rules of Propriety Part I], The Classic of Rites, https://ctext.org/liji/qu-li-i/zh?en=on (accessed 30 January 2024).Google Scholar
Liang, Z. (1989). “Explicating ‘Law’: A Comparative Perspective of Chinese and Western Legal Culture.” Columbia Journal of Asian Law, 3(1): 55–91.Google Scholar
Liu, H-n. (2019). “Qin Han lüling zhong de hunyin yu jian [Marriage and Jian in Qin and Han Legal Statutes].” Zhongyang yanjiu yuan lishi yuyan yanjiusuo jikan, 90(2): 199–251.Google Scholar
Liu, Y. (1998). Origins of Chinese Law: Penal and Administrative Law in Its Early Development. Hong Kong & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meloni, M. (2021). “Porous Bodies: Environmental Biopower and the Politics of Life in Ancient Rome.” Theory, Culture and Society, 38(3): 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, K. (2007). “Shin kan keibatsu taikei keiseishi eno ichi shiron—fukei to shutsuhenkei [A Hypothesis Concerning the History of the Development of the Penal System during the Qin and Han Dynasties: Castration and Punitive Military Service].” Tōyōshi kenkyū, 66(3): 367–99.Google Scholar
Mizuma, D. (2007). “Shinritsu kanritsu ni okeru joshi no hanzai ni taisuru shobatsu—Kazokuteki chitsujo to no kankei o chūshin ni [The Punishments of Women’s Crimes in Qin and Han Statutes—Centering on the Relationship with Family Hierarchy].” In Kodai Higashi Ajia no shakai to bunka: Fukui Shigemasa sensei koki taishoku kinen ronshū [Society and Culture of Ancient East Asia: Collected Essays in Honor of Professor Fukui Shigemasa’s Seventieth Birthday and Retirement], 99–119. Tōkyō: Kyūko Shoin.Google Scholar
Mutschler, F. H. & Mittag, A., eds. (2008). Conceiving the Empire: China and Rome Compared. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nylan, M. (2005–06). “Notes on a Case of Illicit Sex from Zhangjiashan: A Translation and Commentary.” Early China 30: 25–45.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (1981). “Approaches to the Sources on Adultery at Rome.” Women’s Studies, 8: 225–50.Google Scholar
Robinson, O. F. (1995). The Criminal Law of Ancient Rome. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, O. F. (1997). The Sources of Roman Law: Problems and Methods for Ancient Historians. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sanft, C. (2014). Communication and Cooperation in Early Imperial China. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W., ed. (2009). Rome and China: Comparative Perspectives on Ancient World Empires. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidel, W., ed. (2015). State Power in Ancient China and Rome. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shimokura, W. (2005). “Shinkankaninzai zakkō [On the Penal Code Concerning Immoral Intercourse in the Qin and Han Dynasties].” The Tohoku Gakuin University Review, History and Geography, 39: 105–74.Google Scholar
Shuihudi qinmu zhujian zhengli xiaozu [Working Team of the Bamboo Slips from Shuihudi Qin Tombs]. (1990). Shuihudi qinmu zhujian [Bamboo Slips from Shuihudi Qin Tombs]. Beijing: wenwu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Sima, Q. (1982). Shi ji. Punctuated and collated by the Zhong hua shu ju Editorial Team. Beijing: Zhong hua shu ju (original work published circa 91 BCE).Google Scholar
Sommer, M. H. (2002). Sex, Law, and Society in Late Imperial China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, X. (1989). Li ji ji jie [Collected Commentaries of the Book of Rituals]. Punctuated and collated by Shen, X. & Wang, X.. Beijing: Zhong hua shu ju (original work published 1860 CE).Google Scholar
Tomiya, I. (1998). Shin Kan keibatsu seido no kenkyū [Penal Systems of the Qin and Han Dynasties]. Tōyō shi kenkyū sōkan 55. Kyōto: Dōhōsha.Google Scholar
Tomiya, I. (2014). “The Conception of Fornication: From the Han Code to the Tang Code.” In Zhongguo zhengfa daxue falü guji zhengli yanjiu suo, ed., Zhongguo gudai falü wenxian yanjiu [Study of Pre-Modern Chinese Legal Texts], Vol. 8, 130–40. Beijing: Zhongguo zhengfa daxue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Tomiya, I. (2016). “Danjo-kan no seiteki hanzai—kanzai ni tsuite [Sexual Crimes between Men and Women—about the ‘Jian’ Crime],” in Tomiya, I., ed., Kan Tō hōseishi kenkyū [A Study of Legal History from the Han to the Tang], 439–70. Tōkyō: Sōbunsha.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. (1996). “Social Status and Social Legislation.” The Cambridge Ancient History, 10: 873–904.Google Scholar
Turner, K. (1993). “War, Punishment, and the Law of Nature in Early Chinese Concepts of the State.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 53(2): 285–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, K. (2009). “Law and Punishment in the Formation of Empire.” in Scheidel, W., ed., Rome and China: Comparative Perspectives on Ancient World Empires, pp. 52–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H. (2007). “Qin Han jian zui kao [Investigation of the ‘Jian’ Crime in the Qin and Han].” Gansu lilun xuekan [Gansu Theory Research], 3: 105–8.Google Scholar
Watson, A., ed. (1985). The Digest of Justinian, Vol. 4. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. ProQuest Ebook.Google Scholar
Watson, B. (1993). Records of the Grand Historian: Qin Dynasty. Hong Kong
: Research Centre for Translation, Chinese University of Hong Kong; New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, B. (1981). Chun qiu zuo zhuan zhu [Annotation of the Zuo Tradition of the Spring and Autumn Annals]. Beijing: Zhong hua shu ju.Google Scholar
Yates, R. D. S. (2009). “Law and the Military in Early China.” In Di Cosmo, ., ed., Military Culture in Imperial China, 23–44, 341–3. Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Yates, R. D. S. (2021). “Female Commoners and the Law in Early Imperial China.” In Beck, H. & Vankeerberghen, G., eds., Rulers and Ruled in Ancient Greece, Rome, and China, 156–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, J. (2004). “Zhangjiashan hanjian suojian de jiating fanzui ji xingfa ziliao [Materials Regarding Crimes within the Family and the Punishments as Seen in the Zhangjiashan Han Manuscripts].” in Zhongguo zhengfa daxue falü guji zhengli yanjiu suo, ed., Zhongguo gudai falü wenxian yanjiu [Study of Pre-Modern Chinese Legal Texts], Vol. 2, 43–65. Beijing: Zhongguo zhengfa daxue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Zeng, C. (2021). “‘Confucianization of Law’ Revisited.” Asian Philosophy, 31(1): 88–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X. (2004). “Shi zhangjiashan hanjian zhong de ‘yubi’ [Interpretation of the ‘Yubi’ in Zhangjiashan Han Slips].” In Zhongguo wenwu yanjiu suo, ed., Chutu wenxian yanjiu [Studies of Excavated Texts], 6, 125–9. Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. (2022). A History of Civil Law in Early China: Cases, Statutes, Concepts and Beyond. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Zhangjiashan ersiqi hao hanmu zhujian zhengli xiaozu [Working Team of the Bamboo Slips from Zhangjiashan Han Tomb No. 247]. (2006). Zhangjiashan hanmu zhujian (shiwen xiuding ben) [Bamboo Slips from Zhangjiashan Han Tombs (Interpreted and Revised Edition)]. Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Zhangsun, W. et al. (1983). Tanglü shuyi [Commentary and Discussion of the Tang Code]. Punctuated and collated by Liu, J.. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju (original work published circa. 627–49 CE).Google Scholar
Zhu, H. & Chen, S., eds. (2013). Yuelu shuyuan cang qin jian [Qin Slips at the Yuelu Academy], 3. Shanghai: Shanghai cishu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Zhu, Z. (1985). “Lüe lun Jin lü zhi ‘ru jia hua’ [A Brief Discussion of the ‘Confucianization’ of Jin Law].” Zhongguo shi yanjiu [Journal of Chinese Historical Studies], 2: 109–24.Google Scholar