Review process
This journal uses a double-anonymised model of peer review. Neither author nor reviewers know the identity of each other.
Exceptions to the stated review process for this journal apply to some article types:
- Reflections and Insights articles are reviewed single-anonymously.
To appeal an editorial decision, contact the Editorial Office and specify the reason for your appeal. Your appeal will be reviewed by the Co-Editors-in-Chief. The final decision regarding your appeal will rest with the Co-Editors-in-Chief.