Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-xq6d9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-10T18:22:55.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Asia Pride, China Fear, Tokyo Anxiety: Japan Looks Back at 2008 Beijing and Forward to 2012 London and 2016 Tokyo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2025

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The logo of Tokyo's bid for the 2016 Olympics is the musubi, a traditional Japanese decorative knot. The design uses the five Olympic colors as the strands that fold over to form a simple and colorful knot. Japanese have long used the musubi to tie up gifts on auspicious and formal occasions and to signify the ties that bind people together. Thus, a Bid Committee press release explains that the musubi logo “represents Tokyo 2016's mission to unite people young and old with sport and healthy living, unite green with 2016, unite the city and the Games, and unite old and new Japan.” This is common rhetorical fare for a Games applicant, although in addition to such public relations sloganeering of domestic benefit, many have noticed the aesthetic resemblance of the musubi to the designs of the candidate city logos for Beijing 2008 and London 2012. Unlike the eventual Games logos (the much-admired “Dancing Beijing” calligraphic figure and London's already-reviled, jagged “2007” logo), Beijing and London used entirely distinct logos when they were candidate cities, both based on flowing ribbon motifs. However unintentional the design similarities, they do remind us just how necessarily attuned an applicant and then candidate city must be to ongoing Games cycles. For Tokyo's 2016 effort, this has required a triangulation between the long and fraught Sino-Japanese relationship and the competition between London and Tokyo as global financial centers.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009

References

Sources

Dyreson, Mark. 2008Epilogue: Athletic Clashes of Civilizations or Bridges over Cultural Divisions? The Olympic Games as Legacies and the Legacies of the Olympic Games.” International Journal of the History of Sport 25(14): 21172129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrer, James. 2008One Bed, Different Dreams: The Beijing Olympics as Seen in TokyoPolicy Innovations. August. Online at http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/comme ntary/data/000079. Accessed November 12, 2008.Google Scholar
International Journal of the History of Sport. 2008 Special Issue on “Olympic Legacies: Intended and Unintended - Political, Cultural, Economic, Educational25(14): 18692129.Google Scholar
Iwabuchi, Koichi. 2008Lost in TransNation: Tokyo and the Urban Imaginary in the Era of Globalization.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 9(4): 543556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, William W. Forthcoming. “Introduction: Beijing 2008: The Limits of Exceptionalism.” In The Olympics in East Asia: The Crucible of Localism, Nationalism, Regionalism, and Globalism, edited by Kelly, William W. and Brownell, Susan. New York: Greekworks.Google Scholar
Leheny, David. 2006 Think Global, Fear Local: Sex, Violence, and Anxiety in Contemporary Japan. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Takashi, Machimura. 2007 “Mega ibento to toshi kūkan: dai-ni raundo no ‘Tōkyō Orinpikku’ no rekishi-teki imi wo kangaeru[Mega-events and Urban Space: Reflections on the Historical Meanings of the Second Round of the ‘Tokyo Olympics‘] Supōtsu shakaigaku kenkyū 15: 316.Google Scholar
Mangan, J. A. 2008Prologue: Guarantees of Global Goodwill: Post-Olympic Legacies –Too Many Limping White Elephants?International Journal of the History of Sport 25(14): 18691883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, John. 2004 Japan Unbound: A Volatile Nation's Quest for Pride and Purpose. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
byline, No. 2009Early in, Early Out: An Economy Not Hit Directly by the Financial Storm Is Shrinking Much Faster than Any Other Developed One.” The Economist, January 22.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 1991 The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sherif, Ann 2009 “The Aesthetics of Speed and the Illogicality of Politics: Ishihara Shintarō as a Cold War Youth” In her Japan's Cold War: Media, Literature, and the Law. Pages 173202. New York: Columbia Press Press.Google Scholar
The Editors, A. T. Kearney Inc. and Chicago Council on Global Affairs, eds. 2008The 2008 Global Cities Index.” Foreign Policy 168: 6876.Google Scholar
Tomiko, Yoda and Harootunian, H. D., eds. Japan after Japan: Social and Cultural Life from the Recessionary 1990s to the Present. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2006.Google Scholar