Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:45:24.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Viewpoint: Exiles and émigrés, libraries and image collections: the intellectual legacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Jaś Elsner  and
Clare Hills-Nova
Jaś Elsner*
Affiliation:
Corpus Christi College, Merton Street, Oxford, OX1 4JF, UK
Clare Hills-Nova*
Affiliation:
Bodleian Libraries, Sackler Library, 1 St John Street, Oxford, OX1 2LG, UK
*
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , 2013 , pp. 3 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. A seminal contribution is Eisler, C., “ Kunstgeschichte American style,” in Fleming, Donald and Bailyn, Bernard, eds., The intellectual migration: Europe and America, 1930-1960 (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1969), 544–629.Google Scholar
More recent Kunstgeschichte studies include: Dilly, Heinrich, Deutsche Kunsthistoriker 1933-1945, (Munich: Deutscher Kunstverlag, 1988);Google Scholar
Böhne, Edith & Motzkau-Valeton, Wolfgang, eds. Die Künste und die Wissenschaften im Exil 1933-1945 (Gerlingen: L. Schneider, 1992);Google Scholar
Wendland, Ulrike, ed., Biographisches Handbuch deutschsprachiger Kunsthistoriker im Exil (Munich: K.G. Saur, 1999);Google Scholar
Michels, Karen, Transphntierte Kunstwüsenschaft: deutschsprachige Kunstgeschichte im amerikanischen Exil (Berlin: Akademie, 1999);Google Scholar
Soussloff, Catherine M., ed., Jewish identity in modern art history (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1999);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behr, Shulamith and Malet, Marian, eds., Arts in exile in Britain 1933-1945 (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2005). The Dictionary of art historians (http://www.dictionaiyofarthistorians.org/), of which Lee Sorensen is the editor, is similarly crucial for gathering together information on individual art historians, including many exiles and émigrés.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. We here use the term ‘librarian’ as shorthand for those individuals who worked not only in libraries but also in image collections.Google Scholar
3. Fleming, and Bailyn, , The intellectual migration, concentrating on American immigration, cover a range of fields from the sciences and social sciences to philosophy, psychology, psychoanalysis and the humanities. We look forward to H.P. Obermayer’s forthcoming Deutsche Altertumswissenschafiler im amerikamschen Exil (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014), which includes an essay on Elisabeth Jastrow, also discussed in these pages.Google Scholar
4. On the development of photographic archives as systematic tools of scholarly research, see Caraffe, C., ed., Fotografie ab Instrument und Medium der Kunstgeschichte (Berlin: Deutscher Kunstverlag, 2009)Google Scholar
and Caraffa, C., ed., Photo archives and the photographic memory of art history (Berlin: Deutscher Kunstverlag, 2011).Google Scholar
5. “[B]y the end of the Third Reich the most sophisticated research library network the world had ever seen could no longer be called a medium of scholarly exchange.” Richards, Pamela Spence, ‘“Aryan librarianship”: academic and research libraries under Hider’, Journal of library history 19, no. 2 (spring 1984): 231–258.Google Scholar
6. Notably in Foucault, M., The order of things: an archaeology of the human sciences (London: Pantheon, 1970) and The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse ofhnguage (London: Roudedge, 1972).Google Scholar
7. See also Kraye, J., ‘Unpacking the Warburg Library,’ Common knowledge 18 (2012): 117-27, esp. 118.Google Scholar
8. Panofsky, Erwin, ‘Zum Problem der Beschreibung und Inhaltsdeutung von Werken der bildenden Kunst’, Logos 21 (1932): 103-19, tr. as ‘On the problem of describing and interpreting works of art’ Critical inquiry 38 (2012): 467-482.Google Scholar
9. See Panofsky, Erwin and Saxl, Fritz, Dürers ‘Melencolia I’: eine quellen- und typengeschichtliche Untersuchungen (Leipzig: B.G. Teubner, 1923),Google Scholar
later revised as Klibansky, R., Panofsky, E. and Saxl, F., Saturn and Mehncholy (London: Nelson, 1964).Google Scholar
On Panofsky in Hamburg, see the papers by Dilly, Heinrich, Wendland, Ulrike, Bredekamp, Horst, Warnke, Martin and Michels, Karen in Reudenbach, Bruno, ed., Erwin Panofsky: Beiträge des Symposions Hamburg, 1992 (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1994).Google Scholar
10. See Panofsky, Erwin, chapter 1, ‘Introductory’ in Studies in iconology: humanistic themes in the art of the Renaissance (Oxford: Oxford UP, 1939), 3–17;Google Scholar
and Panofsky, Erwin, chapter 1, ‘Iconography and iconology: an introduction to the study of Renaissance art’ in Meaning in the visual arts (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1955), 26–41;Google Scholar
with discussion by Elsner, Jaś and Lorenz, Katharina, ‘The genesis of iconology’, Critical inquiry 38 (2012): 483–512.Google Scholar
11. See Kern, Martin, ‘The emigration of German sinologists 1933-1945: notes on the history and historiography of Chinese studies” Journal of the American Oriental Society, 118, n. 4 (Oct-Dec 1998): 507–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar