Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:55:43.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

KULTUR: showcasing art through institutional repositories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Wendy White  and
Clare Hemmings
Wendy White*
Affiliation:
Arts and Social Sciences, Hartley Library, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Clare Hemmings*
Affiliation:
Winchester School of Art Library, Park Avenue, Winchester SO23 8DL, UK
*
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Showcasing work has always been at the heart of the arts community, whether it be through an exhibition, site-specific installation or performance. Representation of the original work has also been important and use of print-based options like exhibition catalogues is now complemented by websites and multimedia friendly services like Flickr and YouTube and Vimeo. These services also provide options for sharing born-digital material. For those working in higher education there is a need to profile both the personal and the institutional aspects of creative outputs. The KULTUR project created a model for arts-based institutional repositories and it is hoped that this approach will be useful for other arts institutions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , 2010 , pp. 30 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. The Research Assessment Exercise 2008 was the latest in a series of peer review evaluations of the quality of research in UK higher education institutions.Google Scholar
2. Sheppard, Victoria, ‘KULTUR Project: user survey report’ (KULTUR Project, 2008), http://kultur.eprints.org/docs/Survey%20report%20final%20Aug%2008.pdf.Google Scholar
3. Sheppard, Victoria, ‘Metadata report’ (KULTUR Project, 2009), 3, http://kultur.eprints.org/Metadata%20report%20Final.pdf.Google Scholar
4. Gollifer, Sue, ‘Overview of seminar findings for the e-science scoping study in the visual arts’ (2006), http://ahds.ac.uk/e-science/documents/Gollifer-report.pdf.Google Scholar
5. Sheppard, Victoria, ‘KULTUR Project: user survey report’ (KULTUR Project, 2008), 23, http://kultur.eprints.org/docs/Survey%20report%20final%20Aug%2008.pdf.Google Scholar
6. Gray, Andrew, ‘Institutional repositories for creative and applied arts research: the KULTUR project,’ Ariadne no. 60 (July 2009), http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue60/gray/.Google Scholar
7. Sheppard, Victoria, ‘KULTUR Project: user survey report’ (KULTUR Project, 2008), 15, http://kultur.eprints.org/docs/Survey%20report%20final%20Aug%2008.pdf.Google Scholar
8. Eadie, Mick, ‘Scenario A: artist’s video with copyright material in the soundtrack’ (University of Southampton, 2009), http://kultur.eprints.org/docs/IPR%20scenario%20A.pdf.Google Scholar
9. Eadie, Mick, ‘Fair dealing in an institutional repository: a report for KULTUR’ (2008), 6–7, http://kultur.eprints.org/docs/IP%20paper%202%20final.pdf.Google Scholar
10. The Research Excellence Framework (REF) is the new system for assessing the quality of research in UK higher education institutions, http://www.hefce.ac.uk/research/ref/.Google Scholar