Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:02:00.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The event that got away and how to catch it (researching ephemeral art)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Jayne Wark*
Affiliation:
Art History Department, Nova Scotia College of Art & Design, 5163 Duke Street, Halifax, NS B3J 3J6, Canada
Get access

Abstract

As the underpinnings of High Modernism were everywhere being called into question in the 1950s and 1960s, the art world endeavoured to reinvent itself in new ways. For example, the view that meaning in art need not be embodied in static, timeless objects of supposedly universal significance was challenged by the idea of art as time-based, context-specific, or ephemeral. For artists, these changes offered a way to reformulate the art world system in accordance with their vision of what mattered, and thus to diminish the authority of big museums, commercial galleries, and glossy trade magazines, whose main function seemed to be the promotion of art not as a mode of critical inquiry, but as a luxury product for ‘Establishment’ elites.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Baker, Nicholson. Double fold: libraries and the assault on paper. New York: Random House, 2001. ISBN 0375504443Google Scholar