Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T00:59:17.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A building as a contextual machine: the Printworks in Dublin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Raymund Ryan
Raymund Ryan
Affiliation:
School of Architecture, University College Dublin, Richview, Clonskeagh, Dublin 14, Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As disciplines, urban design and architecture often seem to be at cross purposes. Urban design tends to concern itself with the collective, architecture with isolated buildings. The Group 91 framework plan for Dublin's Temple Bar is an integrated proposal by architects for the creation of public urban spaces and for the insertion of new buildings into the historic fabric. In particular, the Printworks by Derek Tynan is a didactic model: it suggests how people can beneficially live and work in a quickly evolving city and offers an urbanism of collage and potent reciprocity.

Type
Design
Information
arq: Architectural Research Quarterly , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 1999 , pp. 29 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Browne, K. (1974). ‘Cuairt an AR ar Bhaile Átha Cliath’ in The Architectural Review, 11 1974.Google Scholar
Oxford Companion to Art (1970), Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Poggi, C. (1992). In Defiance of Painting, Cubism, Futurism and the Invention of Collage. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
Rowe, C. and Koetter, F. (1978). Collage City, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. (1981). ‘The Present Urban Predicament’ in The Cornell Journal of Architecture #1.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. (1983). ‘Dublin: The Park and the City’ in The Cornell journal of Architecture #2.Google Scholar